There is no single number; it tracks trip length, cost and sponsorship
No fixed figure exists, and the applicants who struggle most are the ones who go looking for one. The balance a visa file has to show is derived from the trip rather than looked up in a table. Change the length of the stay and the number changes with it; change who is paying and the question changes too.
Three things do most of the work, and every published requirement is some combination of them.
How long you will be there
The days of stay on the itinerary you file set the multiplier. A fortnight and a semester are different sums before any rate is applied.
add a week to the stay and the figure rises with it, whatever the destination.
How much is already paid
A prepaid hotel, a settled course fee and a confirmed return ticket are costs that no longer have to come out of the balance.
book and pay before you file, and the deduction grows while the stay stays the same.
Who is paying
Self-funded, sponsored by a parent or spouse, or covered by an employer: this decides whose account is being read at all.
move the cost to a sponsor and the test moves to the sponsor's statements, not away.
A figure copied from a forum thread fails on all three. It was somebody else's trip length, somebody else's booking position and often somebody else's year. The question "is a particular sum in lakhs enough" has no answer until the destination, the days and the bookings are known, and once they are known the answer is arithmetic rather than opinion. Where an authority does publish an amount, it publishes the basis alongside it, and the basis is the part that travels between cases.
More money than the figure does not improve the file in proportion. Once sufficiency is shown, the remaining questions are about purpose, ties and the intention to return, and a balance cannot answer them. An unusually large balance with an unclear source can move the reader's attention onto where the money came from, which is a harder question than whether there is enough of it.
How consulates arrive at a daily maintenance figure
The arithmetic is duller than the anxiety around it. A daily maintenance amount is multiplied by the number of days of stay. Whatever is already paid for comes out. What remains has to be shown as money available without a sale, and the cost of getting home is added on top of it.
The deduction is the interesting half. Several authorities publish two daily rates: a higher one for a traveller with no accommodation booked, and a lower one covering the part of the stay a booking accounts for. Others reduce the rate where a resident host has signed an undertaking to accommodate the visitor. The rate is not a measure of how expensive the country is. It is a measure of how much of each day remains unfunded.
Structures differ far more than the numbers do. The same requirement can be written in any of these shapes, and reading the shape first is what stops a study-route figure being applied to a visitor file.
- One flat daily amountThe same sum for every day of the stay, whatever is booked.
- Two daily ratesA higher rate with no accommodation booked; a lower one for the nights a booking covers.
- A fixed sum per entry, plus a daily amountOne amount for crossing the border at all, then the daily rate on top.
- A share of a wage, with a floorExpressed as a percentage of the destination's own minimum wage, with a floor that applies however short the visit.
- A monthly amount, capped at so many monthsThe study-route shape: living costs per month for a maximum number of months, however long the course.
- No mandatory amount at allEach traveller assessed on the whole file, with a fallback figure only for someone who can evidence nothing.
Return travel is handled as a separate condition rather than folded into the maintenance sum. A confirmed ticket answers it outright. Without one, the fare has to sit inside the balance as well.
Money, not holdings. A maintenance figure is about money available now, so property and investments do not count towards it; they support the wider financial picture and the ties assessment, which is a separate limb of the same decision. That is the distinction that catches an applicant with a substantial asset schedule and a thin bank account, and which holdings can stand behind that is a question of its own.
Balance expectations by visa type: tourist, student and business
Visa type changes the question more than destination does. A short visit, a multi-year course and a three-day conference are assessed on different logic, and anyone who reads a student thread before a visitor appointment will over-prepare in the wrong direction.
Tourist or visitor
The purest version- What sets the days
- The itinerary: arrival to departure, as filed.
- What comes off
- Paid accommodation, a host's undertaking, the confirmed return ticket.
- Whose standing carries it
- Yours alone. There is no employer letter and no institution behind the file, so the balance carries more of the weight.
Where the weight sits: on the balance, on personal ties, and on money that is available without a sale more than anywhere else.
Student
Two components- What sets the months
- A published monthly living-cost amount for a capped number of months, not the full length of the course.
- What comes off
- Fees already paid to the institution reduce the fee side, not the maintenance side; the two are shown separately.
- Whose standing carries it
- Yours or a parent's, where the route allows a parent, spouse or guardian to hold the funds.
Where the weight sits: on unpaid fees plus the capped living-cost sum, held for the period the route names.
Business or conference
The payer's file- What sets the days
- The event or meeting dates, with the travel around them.
- What comes off
- Everything the employer or host organisation has committed to in writing.
- Whose standing carries it
- The payer's: their written commitment and their own standing. Your balance is asked to cover incidentals.
Where the weight sits: on the payer's letter. A self-funded business trip reverts to the visitor calculation without any special treatment.
A visitor file is the purest version of the calculation: the itinerary sets the days, the bookings set the deduction and the residual is the number. A student file has two components and only one of them is maintenance, which is why a three-year course does not call for three years of living costs. A business file shifts the question onto the payer, and the traveller's own statements matter only for what the payer has not covered.
Where published thresholds exist, and where they do not
Evidence handling matters here, because half the honest answer is that there is no answer. Some authorities publish precisely; some publish a basis and leave the arithmetic to the applicant; some state plainly that no mandatory amount has been set and assess each traveller on the whole file. Those are not gaps in the publication. They are the requirement.
Where a figure is published
- Routes that publish tend to publish precisely: a study route will state a monthly amount, a maximum number of months and a holding period, in wording exact enough to apply without interpretation.
- The version date on the page matters as much as the amount printed on it. Summaries reproduce last year's figure long after it has moved; the official page is the only version worth relying on.
Where none is
- Officials assess each traveller individually, against the trip filed and the bookings in it, with a fallback figure only for someone who can evidence nothing about their circumstances.
- A shared visa area does not mean a shared figure: the basis can still be set state by state, and the bases sit far apart.
- "No reference amount" is itself the published position for some destinations, and a file prepared against a borrowed figure answers a question that mission never asked.
- The version date of the page or checklist, and whether the figure changed on it
- The basis: per day, per month, per entry, or none
- The period the money must have been held, and the dates it is measured between
- Whose account may hold it: yours only, or a parent's, spouse's or sponsor's
- What comes off: paid accommodation, a host's undertaking, fees already settled
- The currency the figure is written in, and whether the page names a rate
Everything on that list travels between revisions of the figure. The amount printed on the page is the one thing that does not, which is why this guide does not reproduce any.
How long the money must have been sitting there
The period does more work than the closing figure. A reader given a run of monthly statements sees the shape of an income, the rhythm of spending and any point at which the account ran nearly empty, and none of that is visible on a single closing line.
Average balance and closing balance are different measurements, and the difference is the whole point. Some routes formalise it by requiring the balance never to fall below the stated amount for the whole period they name, which makes the daily balance column the operative record rather than the final line.
A late credit shows itself. A large deposit shortly before filing is visible without any investigation at all. It sits in the same document the applicant supplied, on a date the applicant chose to include, and it is the first thing a reader scanning the credit column stops on.
Where a route wants certainty instead of history, it reaches for a different device altogether. A controlled account released monthly takes the seasoning question off the table: the funds are held at the destination and paid out in instalments, which is why it appears as an option on several study routes.
How long the money must have been held is therefore whatever the route states, and nothing else: a set number of consecutive days or months ending shortly before the application, checked against the statement rather than declared. The rule exists to defeat a balance borrowed for the appointment, so the period is read off the statement's own dates, and a balance that arrived inside it answers the wrong question however large it is.
Sponsored applicants: whose balance gets counted
Sponsorship does not remove the financial test. It moves it. The sponsor's income, the sponsor's balances and the sponsor's existing obligations are assessed on the basis the applicant would have faced, and usually over the same statement period. Some routes also ask the sponsor for an affidavit of support, which is a different document.
self-funded
parent, spouse, guardian
the most common
Income and assets are read differently even when both belong to one sponsor.
Files where both parties are assessed are the most common and the most misread. Understanding the checks behind a submitted file matters more for the sponsor's papers than for the applicant's, because the sponsor is the party the mission has never met.
Whose account the money has to be in is answered by the route, not by convenience: the applicant's, unless the route allows a parent, spouse or guardian to hold it, which several study routes do. Money in a friend's account or an unrelated company's account is the hardest to explain, because neither the relationship nor the consent is easy to evidence. Where the two positions have to be put to a consulate as one figure, as on one date, with the sponsor's share and the applicant's share set out side by side, a statement drawn for a consulate is the document that does it, and it is prepared from the same statements the mission will read.
If a sponsor's balance is part of your file
Send us the mission's checklist page, the date of your appointment and who is paying, and a CA tells you what the statement will rest on before any work starts.
Or call +91 945 945 6700, Monday to Saturday, 9 AM to 6 PM.
Reading a foreign-currency threshold from a rupee balance
A published requirement is expressed in the destination's currency and the account is held in rupees, so a conversion sits between them. The conversion itself is arithmetic. The choices around it are not.
The rupee figure stays primary
The reader on the other side needs all three to check the arithmetic, which is why the converted figure never stands alone.
Movement between filing and decision is the reason for a margin. A balance clearing the threshold by a sliver may not clear it a fortnight later. Converting a dated rupee position with a stated rate makes that assumption visible instead of burying it inside a single number.
Once the position and the rate are settled, both need attesting together. The statement for a consulate described in the previous section can carry the two currencies and the rate used, which is what a reader on the other side needs in order to check the arithmetic rather than take it on trust.
