When the Register Stops Matching the Floor
📌 TL;DR - Fixed Asset Verification Services at a Glance
Fixed asset verification confirms that assets carried in the register physically exist, in the location, condition and custody recorded against them. The output is an exception list splitting items into found, not found, and found but never capitalised, with coverage stated as a share of value. CARO 2020 clause 3(i)(b) requires the auditor to report on management verification at reasonable intervals and on material discrepancies. Frequently scheduled before a statutory audit.
Fixed asset verification is a physical check of what the fixed asset register claims you own: each item found, identified, and matched back to the line carrying its cost and depreciation. It is ordered when the register has stopped describing the floor, which happens quietly. Assets move between sites without a note, replacements are booked as repairs, and machines that were scrapped years ago keep depreciating on a schedule nobody reads.
Why a Fixed Asset Register Drifts From the Floor
Four movements do most of the damage. Transfers between plants recorded in email rather than in the register. Capitalisation out of capital work-in-progress (cwip) at a project total, so twenty assets enter as one line. Part replacements that should have been treated as componentisation and were charged to repairs instead. And disposals where the asset left the gate long before the paperwork left the desk.
What a Physical Check Proves That a Ledger Cannot
A ledger records a decision; the floor records the outcome. Physical verification of fixed assets establishes that a tagged, identifiable item exists, sits where the register says, and is in use rather than idle in a corner. It separates ghost assets still absorbing depreciation from working assets that were never capitalised. Neither is visible in a trial balance, and neither is corrected by a better spreadsheet.
Who Asks for Verification, and When
Statutory auditors ask because CARO 2020 requires them to report on whether the company runs a programme of physical verification of property, plant and equipment at reasonable intervals, and on material discrepancies found. Insurers ask before renewing cover on plant they have never seen. Lenders ask when machinery is charged as security. Acquirers ask during due diligence, when a fixed asset verification report is cheaper than a surprise after completion.







