1. Home
  2. GST Refund
  3. RFD-06 Analysis Services
Trusted by 10,000+ Businesses

GST RFD-06 Rejection Order Analysis (Rule 92 + Section 107 Appeal)

Reviewed by CA & CS Team · Patron Accounting LLP ICAI & ICSI Registered| 15+ Years Experience| Last Updated: 11 May 2026 Verify Credentials →

Documents: RFD-06 PDF, original RFD-01 ARN, RFD-08 SCN if any, RFD-09 reply if any, supporting evidence pack, demand orders if RFD-07A or 07B.

Fees: Section 107 appeal starts at Rs 25,000 plus 18 percent GST plus 10 percent statutory pre-deposit.

Eligibility: Any GST taxpayer aggrieved by RFD-06 sanction or rejection order; appeal within 3 months under Section 107(1); +1 month condonable.

Timeline: Appeal filing 7 to 14 days; APL-04 Order-in-Appeal aspirational 1 year; further GSTAT 3+3 months window.

10,000+ Businesses Served | 4.9 Google Rating | 50,000+ Documents Filed | 15+ Years Experience

15+ YearsIndustry Experience
CA & CSCertified Experts
4.9
Based on 500+ reviews

Get Free Consultation

Talk to a CA/CS expert today

🇮🇳 +91

Our team will get back to you shortly. No spam.

Real Stories from Real People

Hear how teams across industries use Patron to save time, cut costs, & stay in control.

Fetching latest Google reviews…
Our Rs 38 lakh service-export refund was rejected in October 2025 citing service does not qualify as export. Patron filed Section 107 appeal with APL-01A grounds invoking Mavenir Karnataka HC and Gujarat HC December 2025 ruling. APL-04 in March 2026 reversed the rejection completely; Rs 39.4 lakh including Section 56 interest disbursed within 30 days.
MN
Manish Naidu
CFO, Mumbai IT Services Exporter
★★★★★
2 months ago
Department issued RFD-06 rejection without ever sending us RFD-08 SCN or hearing notice. Patron's K Line India Bombay HC writ petition was admitted; HC quashed the order as void ab initio. Department had to issue fresh RFD-08 - we replied with RFD-09 and Patron's defence pack; fresh RFD-06 sanctioned full Rs 22 lakh refund.
RB
Ritu Bhandari
Director, Pune Engineering Exporter
★★★★★
3 months ago
RFD-08 SCN came citing inverted duty formula error. Patron's RFD-09 reply with VKC Footsteps SC framework and Rule 89(5) recomputation flipped the matter - Department sanctioned Rs 28 lakh refund in fresh RFD-06 without appeal. The 70-percent RFD-09 success rate Patron talks about is real.
AK
Aakash Khurana
CFO, Surat Textile Manufacturer
★★★★★
1 month ago
Sanctioned refund was offset against an old demand under RFD-07A - demand we were already disputing in another forum. Patron's Section 107 appeal challenging the adjustment also got the underlying demand stayed. Rs 18 lakh refund finally credited within 90 days of APL-04. Section 79 audit discipline matters.
SP
Sanjay Pillai
Director, Chennai Chemical Exporter
★★★★★
4 months ago

Join 10,000+ Satisfied Businesses

From pharma, IT services, engineering, textile, and chemical exporters to SEZ suppliers and IDS manufacturers - we handle 200+ RFD-06 litigation matters annually with 95+ percent first-time Section 107 appeal admission rate.

Talk to an Expert
10,000+Businesses ServedGST compliance and litigation support across India.
15+Years ExperienceDeep expertise in IP registration, GST & business compliance.
50,000+Documents FiledReturns, appeals, and filings handled accurately.
4.9★Client RatingTrusted by entrepreneurs, startups, and growing businesses.
ISO CertifiedProfessional standards and documented processes.
SSL SecureYour financial and business data is fully protected.

Overview

📌 TL;DR - RFD-06 Analysis Services at a Glance

Form GST RFD-06 is the final Refund Sanction or Rejection Order issued by the proper officer under Rule 92 of the CGST Rules 2017 within 60 days of RFD-02 acknowledgement. Where rejection is proposed, RFD-08 SCN is issued first; the applicant has 15 days to reply in Form RFD-09. If RFD-06 still goes adverse, the remedy is Section 107 first appeal in Form GST APL-01 within 3 months, with mandatory 10 percent pre-deposit via PMT-06.

Quick ReferenceDetails
Governing ProvisionRule 92 of CGST Rules 2017 read with Section 54(7) of CGST Act 2017
Form NumberForm GST RFD-06 - Refund Sanction or Rejection Order
Statutory TimelineWithin 60 days of RFD-02 acknowledgement under Section 54(7)
Pre-Rejection ProcedureRFD-08 SCN issued first; 15-day reply window in Form RFD-09
First Appeal RouteSection 107 in Form GST APL-01 within 3 months of RFD-06 communication
Pre-Deposit10 percent of disputed tax via Form PMT-06 (mandatory)
Procedural Fairness StandardK Line India Bombay HC 2026 - hearing and SCN prerequisites; absence renders order void ab initio

Form GST RFD-06 is the final adjudication on a refund application. It is issued under Rule 92 of the CGST Rules 2017 by the proper officer within the 60-day window prescribed under Section 54(7) of the CGST Act 2017. The order can sanction the refund in full, sanction in part with rejection of the balance, sanction with adjustment against demand under Form RFD-07A, sanction with withholding under Form RFD-07B, or reject in full. Where rejection in part or in full is proposed, the law mandates a prior Show Cause Notice in Form RFD-08; the applicant has 15 days to file reply in Form RFD-09 with documents, arguments, and request for hearing. Patron's settled discipline is to treat the RFD-09 stage as the substantive opportunity to prevent rejection.

Where the RFD-06 nonetheless goes adverse, three remedies are available. First - Section 107 first appeal before the Appellate Authority in Form GST APL-01 within 3 months of RFD-06 communication (condonable by +1 month with sufficient cause); mandatory pre-deposit of 10 percent of disputed tax via Form PMT-06. Second - if the Order-in-Appeal is also adverse, Section 112 second appeal before GSTAT in Form GST APL-05 within 3 months (condonable +3 months); additional 10 percent pre-deposit. Third - where Rule 92 procedural fairness has been violated (no RFD-08 SCN, no hearing opportunity, ex parte order), Article 226 writ route is open even beyond Section 107 limitation per the recent K Line India Pvt Ltd v UOI Bombay HC ruling dated 15 April 2026 (2026-VIL-381-BOM) - the court held such an order to be void ab initio. Patron Accounting LLP handles the full post-RFD-06 pipeline for 200+ refund litigation matters with first-time appeal admission rate above 95 percent.

Content is reviewed quarterly for accuracy.

What Is Form GST RFD-06?

Form GST RFD-06 is the Refund Sanction or Rejection Order prescribed under Rule 92 of the CGST Rules 2017. It is the final adjudication of the refund application by the proper officer at the original-jurisdiction level. The order specifies - amount sanctioned (broken down by tax head IGST, CGST, SGST, Cess, and minor heads tax/interest/penalty/fee), amount rejected (with same break-up), reasons for sanction or rejection citing specific provisions of GST law and factual findings, reference to any prior provisional sanction in RFD-04, and details of any adjustment against pending demand under RFD-07A or withholding under RFD-07B.

Five possible RFD-06 outcomes:

OutcomeForm PathPatron Response Strategy
Full SanctionRFD-05 payment advice; PFMS Stage 2 validation; bank creditSection 56 interest if beyond Day 60 of RFD-02
Partial SanctionRFD-05 for sanctioned portion; rejected portion appealable under Section 107Two-track recovery and appeal cycle
Sanction With Adjustment (RFD-07A)Sanctioned amount fully offset against pending tax demandDemand legitimacy audit; Section 79 recovery framework review
Sanction With Withholding (RFD-07B)Sanctioned amount withheld pending other proceedings under Section 54(10)/(11)Withholding-specific defence; pending proceedings resolution
Full RejectionRFD-06 with detailed reasoning; appealable under Section 107Comprehensive appeal pack with grounds-by-grounds rebuttal

Key Terms for RFD-06 Analysis:

  • Form GST RFD-06: Refund Sanction or Rejection Order under Rule 92 - the final original-jurisdiction adjudication.
  • Form GST RFD-07A: Order for Complete Adjustment of Sanctioned Refund Against Pending Demand under Section 79.
  • Form GST RFD-07B: Order for Withholding of Sanctioned Refund under Section 54(10)/(11) pending other proceedings.
  • Form GST RFD-08: Show Cause Notice issued before adverse RFD-06 - applicant has 15 days to reply.
  • Form GST RFD-09: Reply to RFD-08 SCN - filed within 15 days with documents and arguments.
  • Rule 92 of CGST Rules 2017: Order sanctioning refund framework - includes procedural fairness requirements.
  • Rule 92(3): RFD-08 SCN before adverse RFD-06; applicant gets opportunity of hearing.
  • Section 54(7) of CGST Act 2017: 60-day final sanction timeline from RFD-02 acknowledgement.
  • Section 107 of CGST Act 2017: First appeal before Appellate Authority - 3 months from communication; +1 month condonable.
  • Section 107(6): 10 percent pre-deposit mandatory for appeal admission.
  • Section 112 of CGST Act 2017: Second appeal before GSTAT against APL-04 Order-in-Appeal.
  • Form GST APL-01 + APL-01A: First Appeal Memorandum and detailed grounds annexure.
  • Form GST APL-04: Order-in-Appeal summary issued by Appellate Authority.
  • Form PMT-06: Challan for 10 percent pre-deposit payment from Electronic Cash Ledger.
  • K Line India Bombay HC 2026: 2026-VIL-381-BOM - RFD-06 without deficiency memo or hearing void ab initio.
  • Article 226 of Constitution: Writ jurisdiction of HC - available where statutory remedy is rendered nugatory by procedural violation.
APL-05 RFD-06 Analysis
Final Order Rule 92 + Section 107 Appeal

15-Ground RFD-06 Rejection Taxonomy

From 200+ RFD-06 rejection matters handled by Patron, the following 15 grounds account for over 95 percent of cited rejection bases. Each is paired with the specific defence strategy and citation framework.

GroundStatutory BasisPatron Defence Strategy
1. Wrong Refund Category SelectedRule 89(2) and Statement matrixFresh RFD-01 with correct category; Section 107 if Department refuses
2. Time-Barred Under Section 54(1)Section 54(1) read with ExplanationLimitation analysis; Mafatlal Industries SC framework; relevant date interpretation
3. Service Not Export per Section 2(6)Section 2(6), 2(13), 13 IGST Act 2017Place of Supply, recipient outside India analysis; Mavenir Karnataka HC
4. GSTR-2B vs RFD-01 Net ITC MismatchRule 36(4) and 89(4)Three-way reconciliation; supplier compliance defence; DRC-03 reversal
5. Inverted Duty Formula ErrorRule 89(5) read with VKC Footsteps SC 2021Formula re-computation; VKC Footsteps narrowing of Net ITC to inputs only
6. Documentary Deficiency Despite RFD-09Rule 89(2) sub-clausesDocument remediation; Specified Officer endorsement chase
7. Place of Supply DisputeSection 77 CGST + Section 19 IGST + Rule 89(1A)PoS analysis under Section 12/13 IGST; PMT-09 inter-head transfer; Notif 35/2021-CT
8. Deemed Export Documentation GapSection 147 + Notification 48/2017-CTForm A intimation chase; Form B receipt evidence; undertaking pack
9. SEZ Endorsement MismatchSection 16(1)(b) IGST + Rule 89(2)(d)/(e) + SEZ RulesEndorsement re-issuance from Specified Officer; DSPF module verification
10. CA Certificate Format Issue (Rs 2L+)Section 54(8) + Rule 89(2)(m)Fresh CA Certificate in exact prescribed format; in-house Patron CA issuance
11. Unjust Enrichment Under Section 54(8)Section 54(8) read with sub-clauses (a) to (f)Carve-out analysis; zero-rated supply does not attract unjust enrichment
12. Refund Below Rs 1,000 ThresholdSection 54(14)ECL refund carve-out per Circular 166/22/2021-GST (no Rs 1,000 minimum)
13. Provisional Refund Balance ErrorRule 91 + Rule 92Computation reconciliation; rectification application; if denied Section 107
14. RFD-07A Adjustment Against DemandSection 79 + Rule 92Demand order legitimacy audit; Section 107 appeal; stay application
15. Procedural Defect - No SCN or HearingRule 92(3) read with K Line India Bombay HC 2026K Line India 2026-VIL-381-BOM citation; Article 226 writ for void ab initio order

For original RFD-01 mechanics (where the matter starts), see GST RFD-01 filing step-by-step. For pre-processing deficiency memos, see GST RFD-03 deficiency response - different from RFD-06 (Rule 90(3) fresh filing not appeal).

Patron Accounting Services for RFD-06 Defence

ServiceWhat We Do
RFD-08 to RFD-09 Reply (Pre-RFD-06 Defence)Grounds analysis within 15-day window; evidence pack; RFD-09 drafting with point-by-point rebuttal; hearing representation - 70 percent of preventable adverse orders reversed here. Strategic Priority
RFD-06 Grounds Analysis + Appeal Viability AssessmentFree 30-minute review of RFD-06 PDF with 15-ground taxonomy mapping. Procedural fairness audit. Appeal viability score. Free
Section 107 Appeal Filing With Hearing RepresentationAPL-01 + APL-01A + certified copy + supporting documents + online filing + APL-02 acknowledgement + hearing + written submissions + follow-up till APL-04 Order-in-Appeal. Standard
Pre-Deposit Coordination via PMT-0610 percent disputed tax computation under Section 107(6); PMT-06 challan generation; Electronic Cash Ledger payment coordination. Included
Section 112 GSTAT Second AppealAPL-05 + evidence pack + written submissions + hearing representation + additional 10 percent pre-deposit coordination. Escalation
Article 226 Writ (Procedural Defect Cases)K Line India citation pack; writ memorandum drafting in HC counsel coordination; hearing; bypasses limitation for void ab initio orders. Add-on
RFD-07A / 07B Adjustment DefenceDemand order legitimacy audit; Section 79 recovery framework review; stay application; Section 54(10)/(11) withholding analysis. Add-on
End-to-End RFD-06 to APL-04 BundleGrounds analysis + Section 107 filing + hearing + Order-in-Appeal recovery + Section 56 interest claim. Bundle
Our Process

8-Step Section 107 Appeal Pipeline

Patron Accounting's appeal pipeline runs the eight sequential stages below, anchored to Section 107 timelines and the K Line India Bombay HC procedural fairness framework.

Step 1

RFD-06 Receipt and Grounds Analysis

Within 7 days of RFD-06 - document review of RFD-06 PDF, RFD-08 SCN if any, RFD-09 reply if any, RFD-01 ARN file. Grounds analysis mapped to 15-ground taxonomy. Appeal viability assessment - viable / partially viable / non-viable; settlement vs litigation recommendation.

15-ground taxonomy mappingProcedural fairness audit
RFD-06 PDFA
Grounds Mapped 01
Step 2

Pre-Deposit Computation and PMT-06 Generation

Within 14 days of RFD-06 - pre-deposit computation at 10 percent of disputed tax under Section 107(6); PMT-06 challan generation; payment from Electronic Cash Ledger (cannot use Credit Ledger). Maximum cap historically Rs 25 crore.

10% of disputed taxElectronic Cash Ledger only
PMT-0610%Section 107(6)
Pre-Deposit Paid 02
Step 3

APL-01 and APL-01A Drafting

Within 30 days of RFD-06 - Form GST APL-01 drafting with detailed grounds in APL-01A; certified copy of RFD-06 procurement from issuing officer; supporting documents pack including all RFD-01 documents plus rebuttal evidence and judicial precedent brief.

Detailed grounds memorandumCertified copy + evidence pack
APL-01 + 01AGROUNDS
Memorandum Ready 03
Step 4

Online Filing on GST Portal

Within 45 days of RFD-06 - online filing on GST portal under Services > User Services > Appeals. Provisional acknowledgement APL-02 issued immediately. Certified copy of RFD-06 must be submitted within 7 days of online filing for final APL-02.

APL-02 provisional ARNCertified copy 7-day deadline
GST PortalAppealsAPL-02 ARNFILE
Appeal Filed 04
Step 5

Standard 90-Day Filing Discipline

Patron's standard target - file within 90 days (3-month statutory limit per Section 107(1)) with 1-month buffer for procedural slippage. Filing later than Day 90 triggers Section 107(4) condonation cycle; later than Day 120 triggers Article 226 writ route only.

Section 107(1) 3-month limit1-month internal buffer
90DaysSection 107(1)
Within Statute 05
Step 6

Condonation Window (Day 91 to Day 120)

Where filing crossed 3-month limit, Section 107(4) condonation application with sufficient cause; +1 month condonable. Beyond Day 120 - statutory bar; only Article 226 writ for procedural violations per K Line India Bombay HC framework.

Section 107(4) +1 monthSufficient cause demonstrated
+30 DaysCondonableSection 107(4)
Condonation 06
Step 7

Personal Hearing Before Appellate Authority

Hearing scheduled - typically 3 to 8 months from filing. Up to 3 adjournments allowed under Section 107(8). Written submissions filed. Evidence and judicial precedent placed on record. Patron's hearing brief covers key grounds with precedent citations.

Up to 3 adjournmentsSection 107(8) framework
3 Adjournments
Hearing Done 07
Step 8

Order-in-Appeal (Form APL-04)

Order-in-Appeal in Form APL-04 with summary of decision. Section 107(13) aspirational 1-year disposal; actual typically 6 to 18 months. Outcomes - confirmation, modification, or annulment under Section 107(11); remand to original is NOT envisaged.

Section 107(11) powersAspirational 1-year disposal
APL-04Order-in-AppealSection 107(13)~1 Year Aspirational
APL-04 Issued 08

Document Checklist for RFD-06 Defence

Keep the following documents ready before initiating RFD-06 defence or Section 107 appeal. Patron Accounting maintains a digital document vault per matter tracking all stages from RFD-01 through APL-04.

RFD-06 receipt documentation:

  • Form GST RFD-06 PDF downloaded from GST portal.
  • Original RFD-01 ARN reference.
  • RFD-08 SCN PDF (if issued).
  • RFD-09 reply PDF (if filed).
  • Hearing notice and any minutes (if hearing was held).
  • Reasons for sanction or rejection from RFD-06 (verbatim citation list).
  • Tax-head and minor-head break-up of sanctioned and rejected amounts.

For Section 107 appeal filing:

  • Form GST APL-01 with appeal memorandum.
  • Form APL-01A with detailed grounds of appeal (point-by-point rebuttal).
  • Certified copy of RFD-06 (within 7 days of online filing).
  • Supporting documents pack - all RFD-01 documents plus rebuttal evidence.
  • Form PMT-06 challan for 10 percent pre-deposit.
  • Power of Attorney (POA) if represented by counsel or CA firm.
  • Index of documents with chronology.
  • Brief on grounds with judicial precedent citations.

For Article 226 writ (where procedural fairness violated):

  • Writ petition memorandum drafted in consultation with HC counsel.
  • Annexures - RFD-01 documentation, RFD-06 (ex parte), no RFD-08 evidence, no hearing evidence.
  • Citation pack - K Line India Bombay HC 2026, Jian International Delhi HC, Mafatlal Industries SC framework.
  • Affidavit of facts.
  • Court fee per HC Rules.
  • Prayer - quash RFD-06; remand for fresh adjudication; interim relief if needed.

Common Challenges and How We Solve Them

ChallengeImpactHow Patron Accounting Solves It
RFD-06 Cites Vague or Boilerplate ReasonsCommon drafting issue - "documentary deficiency" or "further verification required" without specifying. Patron's defence: written representation under Section 107 challenging the order as unreasoned; cite Order-in-Original speaking-order requirement; K Line India Bombay HC procedural fairness standard.
Pre-Deposit Burden on High-Value Disputed RefundWhere disputed refund is large, 10 percent pre-deposit can tie up significant capital. Patron's approach: cumulative pre-deposit calculation across multiple periods if same issue; partial-acceptance route to reduce disputed amount; Section 107(6) Rs 25 crore historical cap awareness.
Limitation Approaching - 3 Months Lapsed Before EngagementWhere client engages Patron in Day 75+ of RFD-06, Patron's expedited filing - same-day grounds analysis; 7-day APL-01 drafting; pre-deposit within 14 days; filing within Day 90. Where Day 90 already crossed, Section 107(4) condonation; if denied, Article 226 writ.
Adjustment Under RFD-07A Against Demand of Doubtful LegitimacyDepartment offsets sanctioned refund against pending demand that is itself under appeal or has been stayed. Patron's defence: Section 79 recovery framework audit; demand order legitimacy review; stay application before Appellate Authority; if demand under appeal, simultaneous stay of recovery.
Ex Parte RFD-06 Without RFD-08 SCNDepartment issues adverse RFD-06 directly without prior SCN or hearing. Patron's primary track: K Line India Bombay HC Article 226 writ for void ab initio order. Secondary track: Section 107 appeal with procedural fairness as primary ground. Both tracks parallel for efficiency.
RFD-06 Issued Beyond 60-Day Section 54(7) WindowFinal sanction crosses Day 60 of RFD-02. Section 56 6 percent interest accrues automatically per Raghav Ventures Delhi HC ruling. Patron's cure: interest computation worksheet; rectification application if RFD-06 omits interest; Section 107 appeal grounds include interest claim if rectification denied.

Fees for RFD-06 Defence and Appeal Services

Fee ComponentAmount
Government Fee (Section 107 appeal filing)Nil (no statutory portal fee); 10% pre-deposit via PMT-06 separately
Patron Accounting Professional Fees - GST Refund ClusterStarting from INR 4,999 (Exl GST and Govt. Charges)
RFD-08 to RFD-09 Reply (Pre-RFD-06 Defence)Rs 18,000 per case plus GST
RFD-06 Grounds Analysis + Appeal Viability AssessmentRs 8,000 per case plus GST
Section 107 Appeal Filing StandardRs 25,000 per appeal plus GST
Section 107 Appeal With Hearing RepresentationRs 35,000 per appeal plus GST
Section 107 Pre-Deposit Coordination via PMT-06Rs 4,000 standalone plus GST
Section 112 GSTAT Second AppealRs 55,000 per appeal plus GST
Article 226 Writ CoordinationRs 75,000 plus court fees plus GST
RFD-07A Adjustment DefenceRs 22,000 standalone plus GST
RFD-07B Withholding DefenceRs 18,000 per case plus GST
End-to-End RFD-06 to APL-04 BundleRs 50,000 bundle plus GST
Success Fee on Refund Recovery0.5 to 2 percent of refund recovered (contested cases)
All fees and charges listed are indicative only and do not constitute a binding offer. Final amounts may vary depending on the volume of work and the complexity involved. Pre-deposit at 10 percent of disputed tax is statutory and additional - paid by client directly via PMT-06 challan. Government fees are payable separately at actuals.

All fees and charges listed are indicative only and do not constitute a binding offer. Final amounts may vary depending on the volume of work and the complexity involved.

Professional service charges for drafting, filing, and representation are separate from the statutory fees. The exact fee depends on the complexity of the case, disputed amount, and number of hearings required. Contact us for a detailed quote.

Get a free RFD-06 Analysis consultation - Call +91 945 945 6700 or WhatsApp us. No-obligation assessment.

How Long RFD-06 Appeal Takes

StageEstimated Timeline
RFD-06 grounds analysisSame day from data share15-ground taxonomy mapping
RFD-09 reply drafting (to prevent RFD-06)10 to 12 days within 15-day windowSubstantive defence opportunity
Pre-deposit computation + PMT-06 generation1 to 2 working daysSection 107(6) framework
Pre-deposit paymentSame day from PMT-06 generationSubject to bank credit timing
APL-01 + APL-01A drafting5 to 10 working daysDetailed grounds preparation
Online filing on GST portalSame day once draft and pre-deposit readyServices > Appeals workflow
Provisional APL-02 acknowledgementImmediate on filingARN issued
Certified copy submission deadlineWithin 7 days of online filingFinal APL-02 follows
Hearing scheduling3 to 8 months from filingVariable by Appellate Authority workload
APL-04 Order-in-Appeal6 to 18 months typicalAspirational 1 year under Section 107(13)
Section 112 GSTAT filing window3 months from APL-04; +3 months condonableCumulative 20% pre-deposit
Article 226 writ admission1 to 6 monthsDepends on HC roster and urgency
End-to-end (RFD-06 to bank credit on success)8 to 18 months typicalSection 107 path
RFD-09 reply window is the highest-leverage stage: The 15-day RFD-09 reply window before adverse RFD-06 is the single most cost-effective opportunity in the entire refund litigation cycle. Patron's 70 percent success rate at the RFD-09 stage means most preventable adverse orders are reversed here without entering the 8-to-18-month Section 107 appeal cycle, without paying 10 percent pre-deposit, and without absorbing the working capital impact of a contested refund.
Key Benefits

Why CA-Led RFD-06 Defence Beats DIY

RFD-09 Reply Discipline Preventing RFD-06

DIY responses often miss the substantive opportunity at RFD-09 stage and proceed straight to appeal after adverse RFD-06. Patron's RFD-09 with documentary defence pack and hearing representation prevents 70 percent of preventable adverse orders - eliminating the entire downstream appeal cost.

15-Ground Rejection Taxonomy

DIY appellants rebut RFD-06 grounds generically. Patron's mapping of cited ground to specific defence strategy and judicial precedent (VKC Footsteps, Mavenir, K Line India, Jian International) gives Appellate Authority concrete legal basis to reverse.

K Line India Bombay HC Procedural Defence

DIY appellants accept ex parte RFD-06 and pursue normal Section 107 path. Patron identifies procedural defects upfront and deploys parallel Article 226 writ which can bypass limitation entirely and result in faster disposal for clean defect cases under the 2026 precedent.

Section 107 Pre-Deposit + Appeal-Pack Discipline

DIY filings frequently miss the certified copy 7-day window or pre-deposit nuances, causing rejection on procedural grounds. Patron's appeal pipeline ensures all 9 procedural compliance gates pass on first filing - 95+ percent first-time admission rate.

Graduated Appellate Hierarchy Coordination

Where Section 107 is unsuccessful, Patron coordinates Section 112 GSTAT escalation, Section 117 High Court appeal, and Section 118 Supreme Court if warranted. Tier-appropriate filing strategy and counsel engagement.

Section 56 Mandatory Interest Capture

DIY filers miss the Section 56 interest entitlement when RFD-06 was beyond 60-day Section 54(7) window. Patron tracks the 60-day cut-off and claims interest at 6 percent (9 percent for appellate orders) per Raghav Ventures Delhi HC framework - automatic.

Trusted by Indian Businesses With RFD-06 Litigation

10,000+ Businesses | 4.9 Google Rating | 50,000+ Documents Filed | 15+ Years of GST Compliance

Outcome proof: A Mumbai IT services exporter recovered Rs 38 lakh refund plus Rs 1.4 lakh Section 56 interest through Section 107 appeal in March 2026. Original RFD-06 from October 2025 had rejected the entire claim citing service does not qualify as export. Patron's APL-01 with detailed grounds invoked Mavenir Karnataka HC 2025 and Gujarat HC December 2025 intermediary services ruling; Order-in-Appeal in March 2026 reversed the original rejection; Rs 39.4 lakh disbursed within 30 days of APL-04.

Trusted by Hyundai, Asian Paints, Bridgestone, and 200+ Indian businesses including pharma, IT services, engineering, textile, electronics, and chemical exporters with active RFD-06 litigation matters. With offices in Pune, Mumbai, Delhi, and Gurugram, Patron Accounting serves businesses across India - both in-person and remotely.

RFD-06 vs RFD-03 vs RFD-08 vs RFD-07A/B

ParameterForm RFD-06Form RFD-03Form RFD-08Form RFD-07A/B
Statutory provisionRule 92 CGST Rules 2017Rule 90(3) CGST RulesRule 92(3) CGST RulesSection 79 / 54(10)/(11)
StageFinal adjudication after processingPre-processing - within 15 days of ARNPre-rejection - during processingPost-sanction - before disbursement
EffectSanction or rejection on meritsOriginal RFD-01 voided; fresh filing requiredSCN; reply opportunity in 15 daysSanction stands but adjusted or withheld
Reply mechanicSection 107 appeal in APL-01Fresh RFD-01 (not reply)Form RFD-09 reply within 15 daysSection 107 appeal on adjustment ground
Pre-deposit10% of disputed tax under Section 107(6)Not applicableNot applicable10% of disputed adjustment if appealed
Time limit3 months under Section 107(1); +1 month condonableOriginal Section 54(1) 2-year applies15 days of RFD-083 months under Section 107
Litigation tierSection 107 to 112 to 117 to 118Article 226 writ if pretextual or beyond 15 daysHearing then RFD-06Section 107 to 112 to 117

Partner Services for Refund Litigation

RFD-06 defence integrates with Patron's broader GST refund and litigation stack:

Legal and Compliance Framework (India)

Rule 92 of CGST Rules 2017: Where, upon examination of the application, the proper officer is satisfied that a refund is due and payable to the applicant, he shall make an order in Form GST RFD-06 sanctioning the amount of refund to which the applicant is entitled. Where the proper officer is satisfied that the amount refundable is not payable to the applicant, he shall issue a notice in Form GST RFD-08 to the applicant, requiring him to furnish a reply in Form GST RFD-09 within a period of fifteen days of the receipt of such notice and after considering the reply, make an order in Form GST RFD-06.

Section 107(1) of CGST Act 2017: Any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under this Act by an adjudicating authority may appeal to such Appellate Authority as may be prescribed within three months from the date on which the said decision or order is communicated to such person.

Section 107(4) of CGST Act 2017: The Appellate Authority may, if he is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from presenting the appeal within the aforesaid period of three months or six months, as the case may be, allow it to be presented within a further period of one month.

Section 107(6) of CGST Act 2017: No appeal shall be filed under sub-section (1), unless the appellant has paid (a) in full, such part of the amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the impugned order, as is admitted by him; and (b) a sum equal to ten per cent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute arising from the said order, subject to a maximum of twenty-five crore rupees, in relation to which the appeal has been filed.

K Line India Pvt Ltd v Union of India (Bombay HC, 2026-VIL-381-BOM, dated 15.04.2026): The Bombay High Court held that an RFD-06 refund rejection order passed without prior issuance of deficiency memo and without affording opportunity of hearing stands in direct violation of Rule 92 of the CGST Rules 2017 and consequently lacks legal validity. Such an order is not merely irregular - it is void ab initio and non-est in the eyes of law. The Department's subsequent conduct of entertaining a fresh refund application and issuing a deficiency memo unmistakably indicates that the proceedings had not attained finality. In such circumstances, the rigid application of limitation cannot be invoked to defeat substantive rights, particularly where the very foundation of the earlier action is legally unsustainable. The judgment reaffirms that procedural safeguards under GST are not dispensable, and any departure renders the order non-est. The Court invoked Article 226 jurisdiction to step beyond the narrow confines of statutory limitation.

Section 112(1) of CGST Act 2017 - Second Appeal Before GSTAT: Any person aggrieved by an order passed against him under Section 107 may appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against such order within three months from the date on which the order sought to be appealed against is communicated to the person preferring the appeal.

Section 112(8) of CGST Act 2017 - Additional Pre-Deposit: No appeal shall be filed under sub-section (1) or sub-section (3) unless the appellant has paid (a) in full, the admitted portion; and (b) a sum equal to ten per cent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, in addition to the amount paid under sub-section (6) of section 107.

Jian International v. Commissioner of Delhi GST (Delhi HC, W.P.(C) 4205/2020): Department right to raise deficiency lapses after 15-day Rule 90(3) window - parallel framework for procedural fairness in refund proceedings.

VKC Footsteps India Pvt Ltd v UOI (SC 2021): Net ITC under Rule 89(5) inverted duty refund formula is narrowed to inputs only - excluding input services and capital goods.

Government references: GST portal, CBIC GST circulars and instructions, and indiacode.nic.in (CGST Act 2017).

What is Form GST RFD-06 and when is it issued?

Form GST RFD-06 is the Refund Sanction or Rejection Order prescribed under Rule 92 of the CGST Rules 2017. It is issued by the proper officer within 60 days of RFD-02 acknowledgement under Section 54(7) of the CGST Act 2017. The order can sanction in full, sanction in part, sanction with adjustment under RFD-07A, sanction with withholding under RFD-07B, or reject in full. Where rejection is proposed, RFD-08 SCN must be issued first under Rule 92(3), with 15-day reply opportunity in Form RFD-09.

What are the most common grounds for refund rejection in RFD-06?

Patron's 15-ground taxonomy from 200+ matters - wrong refund category, time-barred under Section 54(1), substantive ineligibility under Section 2(6) IGST, GSTR-2B vs RFD-01 ITC mismatch, inverted duty formula error per Rule 89(5), documentary deficiency despite RFD-09, place of supply dispute, deemed export documentation gap, SEZ Specified Officer endorsement mismatch, CA Certificate format issue, unjust enrichment under Section 54(8), Rs 1,000 threshold under Section 54(14), provisional refund balance error, RFD-07A adjustment, and procedural defect.

RFD-06 rejection order ke baad kya karein - appeal kaise file karein? (Hinglish)

RFD-06 rejection order ke baad teen tarike hain. Pehla - Section 107 first appeal Form GST APL-01 me file karein 3 mahine ke andar (1 mahina extra condonable). 10 percent disputed tax ka pre-deposit PMT-06 challan se Electronic Cash Ledger se pay karna hai. Detailed grounds APL-01A me dene hain. Personal hearing milti hai. Order-in-Appeal Form APL-04 me 1 saal me aati hai. Doosra - Section 112 GSTAT appeal Form APL-05 me. Teesra - K Line India Bombay HC 2026 ruling ke under Article 226 writ HC me file kar sakte hain even beyond limitation agar Rule 92 procedural fairness violate hui ho.

How do I respond to RFD-08 SCN before it becomes RFD-06?

RFD-08 must be replied via Form RFD-09 within 15 days of receipt. The reply should include - point-by-point rebuttal of each ground cited; supporting documents addressing every documentary issue; computation reconciliation; judicial precedent citations; and request for personal hearing. Patron's settled discipline treats RFD-09 as the substantive opportunity to prevent adverse RFD-06 - 70 percent of preventable adverse orders are reversed at this stage with proper RFD-09 plus hearing representation.

What is the Section 107 appeal pathway against RFD-06?

Section 107 first appeal before the Appellate Authority must be filed in Form GST APL-01 with detailed grounds in APL-01A, within 3 months of RFD-06 communication (condonable +1 month under Section 107(4)). Mandatory pre-deposit of 10 percent of disputed tax via Form PMT-06. Provisional acknowledgement APL-02 issued on online filing; certified copy of RFD-06 must be submitted within 7 days. Hearing scheduled with up to 3 adjournments. Order-in-Appeal in Form APL-04 with aspirational 1-year disposal under Section 107(13).

What is the 10 percent pre-deposit and how is it computed?

Section 107(6) mandates pre-deposit of 10 percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute (after admitted portion is paid in full). Maximum cap historically Rs 25 crore. Paid via Form PMT-06 challan from Electronic Cash Ledger (cannot use Credit Ledger). Where the appeal is against penalty-only order without tax demand, pre-deposit is 10 percent of the penalty. Pre-deposit is refundable with interest under Section 115 if appeal succeeds. PMT-06 receipt is mandatory for APL-02 acknowledgement.

Can RFD-06 be challenged via Article 226 writ?

Yes - particularly where Rule 92 procedural fairness has been violated. Per K Line India Pvt Ltd v UOI Bombay HC dated 15.04.2026 (2026-VIL-381-BOM), an RFD-06 rejection passed without prior RFD-08 SCN or without hearing is void ab initio and non-est in eyes of law - challengeable via Article 226 even beyond Section 107 limitation. Patron's playbook treats Article 226 as parallel to Section 107 - filed concurrently or sequentially based on case posture. For high-amount refunds with clean procedural defect, writ is often more efficient.

What did the K Line India Bombay HC ruling establish in April 2026?

K Line India Pvt Ltd v UOI (Bombay HC, 2026-VIL-381-BOM, 15.04.2026) - the Bombay High Court held that an RFD-06 rejection passed without issuance of deficiency memo and without affording opportunity of hearing violates Rule 92 of the CGST Rules 2017 and is void ab initio. The Court invoked Article 226 jurisdiction beyond statutory limitation since the Department's subsequent fresh refund application acceptance indicated non-finality. The judgment reaffirms that procedural safeguards under GST are not dispensable.

What is the next appellate forum after Section 107?

Section 112 second appeal before the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) in Form GST APL-05 within 3 months of APL-04 Order-in-Appeal communication (condonable +3 months). Additional 10 percent pre-deposit under Section 112(8) - cumulative 20 percent. GSTAT has discretion to refuse appeals below Rs 50,000 under Section 112(2). Beyond GSTAT - Section 117 appeal to High Court within 180 days; Section 118 appeal to Supreme Court within 60 days of HC certificate. Article 226 writ available concurrently.

RFD-06 60-din ke baad aaye to kya karein - Section 56 interest milta hai? (Hinglish)

Haan. Agar RFD-06 final sanction Section 54(7) ke 60-din Window ke baad aati hai, to Section 56 mandatory interest at 6 percent per annum (9 percent appellate) Day 61 of RFD-02 se accrue hota hai - Raghav Ventures v Commissioner of Delhi (Delhi HC 2024) ruling ke under. Yeh statutory hai aur separate claim ki zarurat nahi. Agar RFD-06 me interest component miss hai to rectification application 6 mahine me file karein. Rectification deny hone par Section 107 appeal me interest claim ground include karein. Patron ki RFD-06 analysis hamesha accrued interest compute karti hai.

Quick Answers

  • Statutory provision? Rule 92 of CGST Rules 2017 read with Section 54(7) of CGST Act.
  • Pre-rejection procedure? Form RFD-08 SCN with 15-day reply in Form RFD-09.
  • First appeal? Section 107 in Form GST APL-01; 3 months; +1 month condonable.
  • Pre-deposit? 10 percent of disputed tax via Form PMT-06.
  • Order-in-Appeal? Form APL-04; aspirational 1 year under Section 107(13).
  • Second appeal? Section 112 to GSTAT in Form APL-05; 3+3 months window; additional 10 percent pre-deposit.
  • Procedural fairness defence? K Line India Bombay HC 2026-VIL-381-BOM; Article 226 writ even beyond limitation.
  • Beyond 60-day Section 54(7)? Mandatory Section 56 interest at 6 percent (9 percent appellate).

Statutory Deadlines That Determine Your Appeal Right

RFD-06 appeal deadlines run off the date of communication. Patron tracks each milestone:

  1. Section 107(1) appeal limitation - 3 months from RFD-06 communication. Beyond this, condonation track or writ only.
  2. Section 107(4) condonation - +1 month with sufficient cause. Beyond Day 120, only Article 226 writ remains.
  3. Section 107(6) pre-deposit - 10 percent of disputed tax via PMT-06 mandatory for appeal admission.
  4. Certified copy submission - within 7 days of online APL-01 filing. Provisional APL-02 voids without this.
  5. Section 107(13) aspirational disposal - 1 year from filing. Periodic reminder to Appellate Authority where delayed.
  6. Section 112 GSTAT window - 3 months from APL-04; +3 months condonable. Additional 10 percent pre-deposit.
  7. Section 117 HC appeal - 180 days from GSTAT order; HC condonable.
  8. Article 226 writ - reasonable time. K Line India Bombay HC 2026 framework for procedural violations even beyond limitation.

Got an RFD-06? Time is critical. Call +91 945 945 6700 or WhatsApp us. Free grounds analysis and Section 107 roadmap within 4 business hours.

Got an RFD-06 Rejection? Appeal Right. Recover Fully.

Form GST RFD-06 is the final Refund Sanction or Rejection Order under Rule 92 of CGST Rules 2017 - issued within 60 days of RFD-02 under Section 54(7). The substantive opportunity to prevent adverse RFD-06 is at the RFD-09 reply stage (15 days from RFD-08 SCN), not the eventual Section 107 appeal. Where RFD-06 nonetheless goes adverse, three remedies exist - Section 107 first appeal in APL-01 within 3 months with 10 percent pre-deposit, Section 112 GSTAT second appeal in APL-05 within 3+3 months with additional 10 percent pre-deposit, and Article 226 writ under K Line India Bombay HC 2026 framework where Rule 92 procedural fairness has been violated.

The K Line India Pvt Ltd v UOI Bombay HC ruling dated 15 April 2026 (2026-VIL-381-BOM) is foundational - RFD-06 passed without prior RFD-08 SCN or hearing is void ab initio and writ-able even beyond Section 107 limitation. Patron Accounting LLP handles the full post-RFD-06 pipeline for 200+ refund litigation matters with 70 percent RFD-09 success rate (preventing adverse orders) and 95+ percent first-time Section 107 appeal admission rate, across pharma, IT services, engineering, textile, electronics, and chemical sectors with four physical offices in Pune, Mumbai, Delhi, and Gurugram. Taxpayers gain CA-led grounds analysis across 15-category taxonomy, in-house appeal drafting with judicial precedent citations, hearing representation, K Line India procedural defence pack, graduated appellate hierarchy coordination, and Section 56 interest discipline on delayed sanctions.

Book a Free Consultation - No Obligation.

Adjacent Services for Refund Recovery

RFD-06 defence integrates with the broader refund and litigation stack. Most clients run these services in parallel through the appellate hierarchy.

Content Created: 8 May 2026  |  Last Updated: 11 May 2026  |  Next Review: 8 November 2026  |  Reviewed By: CA & CS Team · Patron Accounting LLP

This page is reviewed every 6 months (Tier 2 freshness - core framework stable; K Line India Bombay HC 2026 ruling integrated; periodic CBIC notifications on appeal procedure). Review triggers include new HC or SC rulings on RFD-06 procedural fairness, Section 107 amendments, pre-deposit framework changes, or GSTAT procedural notifications.

10,000+
Happy Clients

Helping businesses stay compliant and stress-free.

15+
Years Experience

Deep expertise in GST, Income Tax, ROC & business compliance.

50,000+
Documents Filed

Returns, registrations, and filings handled accurately.

4.9★
Client Rating

Trusted by entrepreneurs, startups, and growing businesses.

ISO
Certified

Professional standards and documented processes.

SSL
Secure

Your financial and business data is fully protected.