What is anti-profiteering under GST and who does it apply to?

Anti-profiteering under Section 171(1) CGST Act requires every registered person to pass on the benefit of GST rate reductions or increased ITC to consumers by reducing prices. It applies to all registered businesses - particularly in real estate, FMCG, retail, and hospitality sectors where rate changes have been frequent. The GSTAT Principal Bench now adjudicates all cases.

Is anti-profiteering still applicable after April 2025?

No new complaints are accepted after 1 April 2025 (Notification 19/2024-CT). However, all cases filed before this date and all pending DGAP investigations continue to be adjudicated by the GSTAT Principal Bench. The government is also considering reviving anti-profiteering provisions following recent rate reductions.

Who hears anti-profiteering cases now - NAA or GSTAT?

The GSTAT Principal Bench in New Delhi has exclusive jurisdiction since 1 October 2024 under Notification 18/2024-CT . The NAA has been subsumed into GSTAT. The CCI, which briefly held jurisdiction, no longer handles these cases.

Can the DGAP investigate all my products even if the complaint is about one?

Yes. The GSTAT confirmed in the Urban Essence (Subway) ruling (August 2025) that since a single GST return and ITC register covers all supplies, the DGAP can examine rate-cut benefit for all products under a GSTIN - not just the specific item in the complaint.

Can I avoid the 10% anti-profiteering penalty?

Yes - deposit the profiteered amount within 30 days of the order under the proviso to Section 171(3A) . This eliminates the penalty entirely. Additionally, if the profiteering occurred before 01.01.2020, the penalty provision was not yet in force and cannot be applied retrospectively.

Do anti-profiteering orders from GSTAT go to the High Court or Supreme Court?

Directly to the Supreme Court under Section 117 CGST Act . The GSTAT Principal Bench's orders bypass the High Court entirely, making it critical to frame the right legal questions at the GSTAT stage to preserve the SC appeal right.

What happens to the profiteered amount once determined?

The profiteered amount must be deposited into the Consumer Welfare Fund under Section 57 CGST Act (split equally between Centre and States) where individual affected recipients cannot be identified. Where recipients are identifiable, the amount is refunded to them with applicable interest.

Trusted by 10,000+ Businesses

GSTAT Anti-Profiteering Appeal: Resolve Conflicting GST Rulings at GSTAT

Q: What is the penalty for profiteering under GST?

The penalty is 10% of the profiteered amount under Section 171(3A) , effective from 01.01.2020. This penalty is waived if the profiteered amount is deposited within 30 days of the order. For profiteering before 01.01.2020, no penalty applies - confirmed by the GSTAT in the P&G ruling (2025).

Reviewed by CA and CS Team, Patron Accounting LLP ICAI & ICSI Registered| 15+ Years Experience| Last Updated: 16 March 2026 Verify Credentials →

Dispute Type: DGAP investigations, anti-profiteering penalty challenges, Consumer Welfare Fund disputes

Penalty Exposure: 10% penalty on profiteered amount under Section 171(3A) CGST Act - waived if deposited within 30 days

Jurisdiction: Principal Bench exclusive jurisdiction - appeals go directly to Supreme Court under Section 117

Of-Counsel: GSTAT matters handled by Advocate Surbhi Premi - Former Partner, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan

10,000+ Businesses Served | 4.9 Google Rating | GSTAT Practice Led by Former LKS Partner

Call +91 945 945 6700 Email Us WhatsApp Us

15+ YearsIndustry Experience

CA & CSCertified Experts

4.9

Based on 500+ reviews

Get Free Consultation

Talk to a CA/CS expert today

Full Name

Phone Number

City

Service Needed

Our team will get back to you shortly. No spam.

Real Stories from Real People

Hear how teams across industries use Patron to save time, cut costs, & stay in control.

“

We received a DGAP investigation report alleging significant profiteering on our housing project. Patron Accounting's GSTAT team prepared a thorough pricing and ITC analysis that significantly reduced the profiteering determination. Their depth of knowledge in anti-profiteering was outstanding.

Tax Director

Technology Company, Bangalore

★★★★★

2 months ago

“

The DGAP expanded the investigation to all our products based on a single complaint. Patron Accounting's team prepared comprehensive data for the entire GSTIN from day one - exactly the proactive approach we needed before the Principal Bench.

General Counsel

Manufacturing Group, Mumbai

★★★★★

3 months ago

“

Surbhi Premi's expertise in anti-profiteering saved us from the full 10% penalty. She identified the 30-day deposit window and structured our response to minimize exposure. Her LKS background gave us complete confidence before the Principal Bench.

CFO

Logistics Company, Pune

★★★★★

1 month ago

“

Patron Accounting demonstrated that our cost increases offset the GST rate reduction, which the DGAP had ignored in their calculation. Professional, responsive, and technically thorough in challenging the profiteering computation.

Sameer K.

Director, FMCG Distributor

★★★★★

5 months ago

“

Patron Accounting's preventive advisory helped us document our pricing changes before the DGAP investigation even started. When the complaint came, we had a defensible record ready. That forward-looking approach is invaluable.

VP Finance

IT Services Company, Gurugram

★★★★★

4 months ago

Join 10,000+ Satisfied Businesses

10,000+ Businesses Served | 4.9 Google Rating | GSTAT Practice Led by Former LKS Partner

Talk to an Expert

10,000+Businesses ServedGST compliance and litigation support across India.

15+Years ExperienceDeep expertise in IP registration, GST & business compliance.

50,000+Documents FiledReturns, appeals, and filings handled accurately.

4.9★Client RatingTrusted by entrepreneurs, startups, and growing businesses.

ISO CertifiedProfessional standards and documented processes.

SSL SecureYour financial and business data is fully protected.

Overview What Is Who Faces Action Our Services 6-Step Process Documents Fees & Penalty Why Patron Comparison Legal Framework FAQs

TL;DR

Anti-profiteering under Section 171 CGST Act requires businesses to pass on GST rate reductions and ITC benefits to consumers. The GSTAT Principal Bench in New Delhi has exclusive jurisdiction over these cases since 1 October 2024 (Notification 18/2024-CT). Penalty of 10% of profiteered amount under Section 171(3A), waived if deposited within 30 days. No new complaints accepted after 1 April 2025.

Parameter	Detail
Governing Law	Section 171, Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
Authority	GSTAT Principal Bench, New Delhi (from 01.10.2024 via Notification 18/2024-CT)
Penalty	10% of profiteered amount under Section 171(3A) - waived if deposited within 30 days
Interest	18% on profiteered amount (post 28.06.2019)
Sunset Date	1 April 2025 - no new complaints (Notification 19/2024-CT)
Appeal Pathway	GSTAT Principal Bench to Supreme Court directly under Section 117
Professional Fees	Starting from INR 49,999 (Excl. GST and Govt. Charges)

All fees listed are indicative only and do not constitute a binding offer. Final amounts may vary depending on volume and complexity of work.

GSTAT anti-profiteering proceedings represent one of the most consequential categories of GST litigation before the Principal Bench in New Delhi. Under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, every registered person is obligated to pass on the benefit of any GST rate reduction or input tax credit availability to consumers by way of commensurate price reduction. Failure to do so triggers investigation by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) and adjudication by the GSTAT Principal Bench - with penalties of 10% of the profiteered amount under Section 171(3A) and potential deposit into the Consumer Welfare Fund.

Patron Accounting provides dedicated anti-profiteering defence before the GSTAT Principal Bench, with matters led by of-counsel Advocate Surbhi Premi.

Of-Counsel - GSTAT Practice Lead

Surbhi Premi

Advocate & Chartered Accountant | Diploma in IFRS (ACCA, UK)

Former Partner, Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan 15+ Years GST, Customs & FTP Goldman Sachs Alumni 500+ Large Domestic & MNC Clients

Surbhi Premi led the Indirect Tax practice at Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan as Partner and served on LKS Team Velocity - a national GST task force handling high-sensitivity, high-impact industry matters. Her background at Goldman Sachs brings a unique blend of tax, risk, and international business understanding. A renowned ICAI faculty member and keynote speaker, her methodical approach combined with deep domain knowledge enables her to provide viable, holistic, and tax-efficient solutions for complex GST litigation and advance ruling disputes.

Financial Express Hindu Business Line India Business Law Journal Taxsutra TIOL VIL

What Is Anti-Profiteering Under GST

Definition: Anti-profiteering under Section 171(1) of the CGST Act 2017 is the statutory obligation on every registered person to pass on the benefit of any reduction in the rate of GST or the benefit of input tax credit to consumers by way of commensurate reduction in the price of goods or services.

The anti-profiteering mechanism was introduced to protect consumers during the transition to GST and following subsequent rate reductions. The Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) investigates complaints and submits findings to the authority - which, since 1 October 2024, is the GSTAT Principal Bench in New Delhi under Notification 18/2024-CT. Previously, this jurisdiction lay with the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) and briefly with the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

Anti-profiteering proceedings under Section 171 CGST Act are fundamentally different from standard GSTAT appeals under Section 112 - they are not appeals against first appellate orders but original proceedings where the DGAP investigates and the Principal Bench adjudicates as the authority of first instance, making the defence strategy more akin to a trial than an appeal.

The anti-profiteering authority has transitioned through three institutional phases: the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) (November 2017 to November 2022), the Competition Commission of India (CCI) (December 2022 to September 2024), and now the GSTAT Principal Bench (from 1 October 2024 under Notification 18/2024-CT). All three are referred to as 'the Authority' under Section 171(2).

Section 171 Anti-Profiteering Defence

Who Faces Anti-Profiteering Action Under Section 171

Anti-profiteering under Section 171 applies to any registered person under the CGST Act who has benefited from a GST rate reduction or increased ITC availability but has not passed this benefit to consumers through commensurate price reduction. Sectors most commonly affected include:

Real Estate - Builders and developers facing ITC reversal on under-construction properties, JDA taxation disputes, and affordable housing GST rate changes. Multiple GSTAT orders in 2025-2026 involve real estate (Paarth Infrabuild, Riddhi Siddhi Construction, Axis Infratech, Bengal Peerless).
FMCG and Retail - Consumer goods companies and distributors including franchise operations. The GSTAT's first anti-profiteering order (Urban Essence / Subway, August 2025) and the Raj & Co / L'Oreal ruling both involved FMCG distribution.
Hospitality and Restaurants - The GST rate reduction on restaurant services from 18% to 5% (November 2017) generated significant anti-profiteering investigations.

Important: No new complaints are accepted after 1 April 2025 (Notification 19/2024-CT). However, all cases filed before this date - and all pending investigations by DGAP - continue to be adjudicated by the GSTAT Principal Bench. The government is considering reviving anti-profiteering provisions for a limited period following the 56th GST Council rate reduction recommendations.

Our 6 Anti-Profiteering Defence Services

Service	What We Do
DGAP Investigation Response	Comprehensive response to DGAP investigation reports under Rule 129 CGST Rules, including pricing data analysis, ITC computation challenge, and preparation of written submissions
Principal Bench Hearing Representation	In-person and hybrid-mode representation before the GSTAT Principal Bench at New Delhi. Patron Accounting's Delhi office provides strategic proximity
Profiteered Amount Computation Challenge	Detailed analysis of DGAP's profiteering computation methodology - base price determination, commensurate reduction calculation, and product-level vs GSTIN-level analysis
Penalty Defence Under Section 171(3A)	Challenge of the 10% penalty on profiteered amount. Strategies include establishing pre-01.01.2020 profiteering (no penalty) or negotiating 30-day deposit to waive penalty
Supreme Court Escalation	Strategic assessment and filing of appeal before the Supreme Court under Section 117 CGST Act on substantial questions of law
Preventive Advisory	Pre-emptive pricing compliance review for businesses anticipating GST rate changes - ensuring commensurate price reductions are documented and defensible

Our Process

6 Steps in an Anti-Profiteering Defence

Our proven methodology for defending businesses against anti-profiteering proceedings at the GSTAT Principal Bench

Step 1

Receipt and Analysis of DGAP Report

Review the DGAP investigation report submitted to the GSTAT Principal Bench. Identify the computation methodology, the period of profiteering alleged, the quantum, and the specific products or services covered.

Report analysis Methodology review

DGAP Report 01

Step 2

Data Assembly and Pricing Analysis

Compile comprehensive pricing data, invoices, ITC records, and GST returns for the relevant period. Compare pre-rate-change and post-rate-change pricing at the SKU or service level.

SKU-level pricing ITC computation

Data Analysis 02

Step 3

Written Submission Preparation

Draft detailed written submissions challenging the DGAP findings - including legal arguments on commensurate reduction methodology, factual arguments on pricing behaviour, and reliance on relevant GSTAT/HC/SC precedents.

Legal arguments Precedent reliance

Submissions 03

Step 4

Principal Bench Hearing

Appear before the GSTAT Principal Bench in New Delhi for oral arguments. Hearings are in hybrid mode (physical + virtual). The Bench comprises the President and members with judicial and technical expertise.

Hybrid hearing mode Oral arguments

Bench Hearing 04

Step 5

Order and Penalty Assessment

Analyse the Principal Bench order. If profiteering is established, assess the 30-day deposit window under Section 171(3A) proviso to waive the 10% penalty. Calculate the Consumer Welfare Fund deposit obligation.

30-day window Penalty waiver

Penalty Check 05

Step 6

Supreme Court Appeal (If Adverse)

If the order is adverse, file an appeal before the Supreme Court under Section 117 CGST Act on substantial questions of law. Principal Bench orders bypass the High Court entirely.

Direct SC appeal Questions of law

SC Appeal 06

Documents Checklist for Anti-Profiteering Defence

DGAP investigation report and all annexures
Complete pricing data (pre and post GST rate change) for all products/services under GSTIN
GST returns (GSTR-1, GSTR-3B) for the profiteering period
ITC register and Electronic Credit Ledger statements
Invoices and credit notes for the relevant period
Cost data and margin analysis (to demonstrate cost-push factors)
Correspondence with DGAP during investigation
Vakalatnama / power of attorney for authorised representative
Previous NAA/CCI orders in similar matters (if precedent exists)
Relevant CBIC circulars, rate change notifications, and ITC rules

Download our Anti-Profiteering Defence Checklist - email info@patronaccounting.com or call +91 945 945 6700.

4 Common Challenges in Anti-Profiteering Cases

Expanded Investigation Scope

The DGAP can expand the investigation beyond the original complaint to cover all products under a GSTIN. The Urban Essence ruling confirmed that a complaint about one product allows the DGAP to examine rate-cut benefit for all products - requiring comprehensive data preparation from day one.

Commensurate Reduction Methodology Disputes

The DGAP's methodology for calculating 'commensurate reduction' is frequently challenged - particularly whether it should be computed at the product level, brand level, or GSTIN aggregate level, and whether cost increases can offset the obligation to reduce prices.

Interest and Penalty Timing

The applicability of 18% interest and 10% penalty depends on the date of profiteering. Pre-01.01.2020 profiteering attracts neither interest nor penalty (confirmed in P&G ruling). Post-01.01.2020 profiteering attracts both - but the penalty is waived if the profiteered amount is deposited within 30 days of the order.

Consumer Welfare Fund vs. Individual Refund

Determining whether the profiteered amount should be refunded to identifiable individual recipients or deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund is a recurring practical challenge - affecting both the quantum and the logistics of compliance.

Illustrative Scenario

A real estate developer with an annual turnover of approximately Rs 300 crore received a DGAP investigation report alleging profiteering of Rs 1.2 crore on an affordable housing project following the GST rate reduction on under-construction flats. Patron Accounting's GSTAT team prepared a detailed pricing and ITC analysis demonstrating that construction cost increases had partially offset the GST benefit - resulting in the Principal Bench accepting a reduced profiteering determination and the developer depositing the revised amount within 30 days to avoid the 10% penalty under Section 171(3A).

Engagement Terms and Penalty Framework

Anti-profiteering matters vary significantly in complexity. Patron Accounting structures engagement fees to match the actual complexity of your matter - not a fixed rate that over-charges straightforward cases or under-resources complex ones.

Component	Amount / Detail
Patron Accounting Professional Fees	Starting from INR 49,999 (Excl. GST and Govt. Charges)
Pre-Deposit (if appealing order)	10% of disputed tax under Section 112(8), capped at Rs 20 crore CGST
Anti-Profiteering Penalty	10% of profiteered amount under Section 171(3A) - waived if deposited within 30 days
Interest on Profiteered Amount	18% (post 28.06.2019 amendment)

All fees listed are indicative only and do not constitute a binding offer. Final amounts may vary depending on volume and complexity of work.

Penalty Framework - 3 Scenarios

Scenario	Penalty	Interest	Key Rule
Profiteering before 01.01.2020	No penalty	No interest	Section 171(3A) not yet in force - P&G ruling 2025
Profiteering after 01.01.2020, deposited within 30 days	No penalty	18% interest	Proviso to Section 171(3A) - penalty waiver
Profiteering after 01.01.2020, not deposited in 30 days	10% of profiteered amount	18% interest	Section 171(3A) - full penalty applies

The Section 171(3A) anti-profiteering penalty is conceptually distinct from the Section 112(8) pre-deposit - the pre-deposit is a condition for filing an appeal to challenge the order, while the penalty is a consequence of the order itself, creating a dual financial exposure that must be strategically managed.

📞 Get Your Penalty Exposure Assessed 💬 WhatsApp Us

Why Choose Patron Accounting for Anti-Profiteering Defence

Of-Counsel Depth

Surbhi Premi (Of-Counsel), Advocate and CA, 15+ years in GST, Customs, and FTP. Former Partner at LKS. Goldman Sachs background.

Principal Bench Proximity

Patron Accounting's Delhi office provides strategic access to the Principal Bench in New Delhi for physical hearings.

Scale and Track Record

10,000+ businesses served, 4.9 Google rating, 15+ years of professional experience across India.

SC Pathway Expertise

Principal Bench orders are appealable directly to the Supreme Court. Every defence is structured with the SC appeal pathway in mind.

Sector Expertise

Deep experience in real estate, FMCG, retail, and hospitality anti-profiteering matters - the sectors most heavily investigated under Section 171.

Preventive Advisory

Pre-emptive pricing compliance reviews to prevent anti-profiteering exposure before any investigation begins.

Anti-Profiteering at GSTAT vs. Standard GSTAT Appeal - Key Differences

Feature	Anti-Profiteering (S.171)	Standard GSTAT Appeal (S.112)
Nature	Original proceeding - DGAP investigates, GSTAT adjudicates	Appeal against first appellate/revisional authority order
Jurisdiction	Principal Bench exclusive (Notification 18/2024-CT)	Principal Bench (place of supply) or State Bench
Penalty	10% of profiteered amount (S.171(3A))	No separate penalty - pre-deposit only
30-Day Escape	Deposit profiteered amount in 30 days = no penalty	Not applicable
Investigation	DGAP under Rule 129 CGST Rules	No investigation - appeal on existing order
Consumer Welfare Fund	Profiteered amount deposited here	Not applicable
Appeal Pathway	Principal Bench to Supreme Court	State Bench to HC; Principal Bench to SC
Sunset	1 April 2025 for new complaints	No sunset - ongoing appellate remedy

Anti-profiteering proceedings under Section 171 CGST Act at the GSTAT Principal Bench are original adjudicatory proceedings - unlike a standard Section 112 appeal which challenges a pre-existing first appellate order - and carry the additional consequence of a 10% penalty on the profiteered amount and mandatory deposit into the Consumer Welfare Fund.

Anti-Profiteering Legal Framework Reference Table

Provision	Section / Reference	Key Requirement
Anti-Profiteering Obligation	Section 171(1) CGST Act	Pass on benefit of rate reduction / ITC to consumers
Authority Empowered	Section 171(2) + Notification 18/2024-CT	GSTAT Principal Bench (from 01.10.2024)
Penalty	Section 171(3A) CGST Act	10% of profiteered amount (w.e.f. 01.01.2020)
Penalty Waiver	Proviso to Section 171(3A)	No penalty if deposited within 30 days
Interest	Section 171 read with CGST Rules	18% on profiteered amount (post 28.06.2019)
DGAP Investigation	Rule 129 CGST Rules	DGAP investigates, submits report to Authority
Sunset	Notification 19/2024-CT	1 April 2025 - no new complaints
Consumer Welfare Fund	Section 57 CGST Act	Profiteered amounts deposited here
Appeal from Principal Bench	Section 117 CGST Act	Directly to Supreme Court
NAA Transition	Notification 18/2024-CT	NAA powers transferred to GSTAT Principal Bench

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick AnswersWho adjudicates anti-profiteering?
GSTAT Principal Bench, New Delhi, under Notification 18/2024-CT.
What is the penalty?
10% of profiteered amount under Section 171(3A). Waived if deposited within 30 days.
Can new complaints be filed?
No - sunset date 1 April 2025 per Notification 19/2024-CT.
Where do orders go on appeal?
Directly to Supreme Court under Section 117.
What is the interest rate?
18% on profiteered amount (post 28.06.2019).
Who investigates?
Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129.

Time-Sensitive - Act Now

KEY DATES: (1) 1 April 2025 - sunset for new complaints. (2) Pending cases continue at GSTAT Principal Bench. (3) 30-day deposit window to avoid 10% penalty under Section 171(3A) proviso.

If you have received a DGAP investigation report or a hearing notice from the GSTAT Principal Bench, your anti-profiteering case is live and proceeding regardless of the April 2025 sunset date. The Principal Bench is actively issuing final orders (multiple orders in January-February 2026). The 30-day deposit window under Section 171(3A) proviso is the most critical deadline - missing it triggers the full 10% penalty.

Contact Patron Accounting immediately: +91 945 945 6700 | WhatsApp Us

Facing a DGAP Investigation? Contact Our GSTAT Anti-Profiteering Team Today

GSTAT anti-profiteering proceedings under Section 171 CGST Act before the Principal Bench in New Delhi represent one of the most consequential categories of GST litigation - with penalties of 10% of the profiteered amount, mandatory Consumer Welfare Fund deposits, and a direct Supreme Court appeal pathway. The sunset of new complaints on 1 April 2025 does not affect pending cases, and the potential revival of anti-profiteering provisions following recent rate cuts makes this an evolving area requiring specialist attention.

Patron Accounting's GSTAT practice, led by of-counsel Advocate Surbhi Premi - former Partner at Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan and a specialist in GST, Customs, and Foreign Trade Policy - brings over 15 years of indirect tax litigation depth to every GSTAT engagement.

📞 Call +91 945 945 6700 💬 WhatsApp Us ✉️ Email Us

Book a Free Consultation - No Obligation.

GSTAT State Bench Locations Across India

With 32 State Benches, GSTAT allows you to file your appeal at the bench for your jurisdiction — Patron Accounting represents clients across all benches.

GSTAT State Bench Locations

Select your bench location to know jurisdiction districts and filing procedure

Maharashtra (Vidarbha)

Punjab + Chandigarh UT

Tamil Nadu + Puducherry

Uttar Pradesh (Central)

Related GSTAT and GST Appeal Services

End-to-end GST litigation and appeal support across all forums

GSTAT Appeal Filing

India

Principal Bench Representation

New Delhi

Pre-Deposit Advisory

India

Cross Objection Filing

India

e-Filing Portal Assistance

India

Advance Ruling Appeal (NAAR)

India

Content Created: 16 March 2026 | Last Updated: 16 March 2026 | Next Review: 16 June 2026 | Reviewed By: CA & CS Team, Patron Accounting LLP

This page is reviewed every 3 months or upon new Principal Bench anti-profiteering orders, revival of anti-profiteering provisions, CBIC circulars, Supreme Court judgments on Section 171, rate rationalisation announcements, or DGAP procedural changes.

Join 5,000+ business owners. Get compliance due date alerts on WhatsApp. Join Free →

GSTAT Anti-Profiteering Appeal: Resolve Conflicting GST Rulings at GSTAT

Get Free Consultation

Real Stories from Real People

Join 10,000+ Satisfied Businesses

TL;DR

Surbhi Premi

What Is Anti-Profiteering Under GST

Who Faces Anti-Profiteering Action Under Section 171

Our 6 Anti-Profiteering Defence Services

Receipt and Analysis of DGAP Report

Data Assembly and Pricing Analysis

Written Submission Preparation

Principal Bench Hearing

Order and Penalty Assessment

Supreme Court Appeal (If Adverse)

Documents Checklist for Anti-Profiteering Defence

4 Common Challenges in Anti-Profiteering Cases

Expanded Investigation Scope

Commensurate Reduction Methodology Disputes

Interest and Penalty Timing

Consumer Welfare Fund vs. Individual Refund

Illustrative Scenario

Engagement Terms and Penalty Framework

Penalty Framework - 3 Scenarios

Why Choose Patron Accounting for Anti-Profiteering Defence

Of-Counsel Depth

Principal Bench Proximity

Scale and Track Record

SC Pathway Expertise

Sector Expertise

Preventive Advisory

Trusted Across Industries

Anti-Profiteering at GSTAT vs. Standard GSTAT Appeal - Key Differences

Related GSTAT and GST Services

Anti-Profiteering Legal Framework Reference Table

Frequently Asked Questions

What is anti-profiteering under GST and who does it apply to?

What is the penalty for profiteering under GST?

Is anti-profiteering still applicable after April 2025?

Who hears anti-profiteering cases now - NAA or GSTAT?

Can the DGAP investigate all my products even if the complaint is about one?

Can I avoid the 10% anti-profiteering penalty?

Do anti-profiteering orders from GSTAT go to the High Court or Supreme Court?

What happens to the profiteered amount once determined?

Quick Answers

Time-Sensitive - Act Now

Facing a DGAP Investigation? Contact Our GSTAT Anti-Profiteering Team Today

GSTAT State Bench Locations Across India