Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Tamil Nadu

GST Tax Rate for Tapioca Residue: Tamil Nadu Advance Ruling TN/25/AAR/2023

The Authority for Advance Ruling decided that fibrous tapioca residue is taxable at 5% under HSN 2303.10, not exempt as flour.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No. 25 /AAR/2023 Dated: 20.06.2023
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Tapioca residue is classified as starch manufacturing waste, not flour.
  2. The product is taxable at 5% under HSN 2303.10.
  3. Registration is mandatory if aggregate turnover exceeds the Section 22 threshold.

In short

V.S. Trading Company asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Tamil Nadu whether their tapioca product was exempt flour or taxable industrial residue. The company argued it was flour under HSN 1106, which is often exempt from Goods and Services Tax (GST). The authority disagreed, ruling that because the product is a fibrous byproduct of starch extraction, it falls under a different category.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often assumed that crushed tapioca products could be classified as flour under HSN 1106 to claim a tax exemption.

What has changed

The authority clarified that residues from starch manufacturing are taxable at 5% under HSN 2303.10. This means businesses selling this byproduct must collect and pay GST rather than treating it as an exempt item.

Who this affects

Traders and manufacturers dealing in tapioca starch byproducts or fibrous residues.

An example

A starch factory owner sells the fibrous 'kappi' left over after processing. They previously classified it as flour to avoid GST. After this ruling, they should reclassify it under HSN 2303.10 and begin charging 5% GST to avoid future tax demands.

What you should do

If you sell similar residues, review your HSN classification to ensure you are not incorrectly claiming an exemption. Remember that an advance ruling only binds the specific business that asked and their local tax office; it is not a universal law for all taxpayers.

If you do nothing

If you misclassify your goods, a tax officer may issue a demand for unpaid GST plus interest and penalties. Relying on a ruling that does not apply to your specific facts can lead to costly disputes during an audit.

The terms explained

HSN
Harmonized System of Nomenclature is a code used to classify goods for taxation purposes.
Aggregate turnover
The total value of all taxable and exempt supplies made by a business across India.
Advance ruling
A formal decision by tax authorities on how GST applies to a specific business transaction.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. V.S. Trading Company

Advance Ruling No. 25 /AAR/2023 Dated: 20.06.2023 · Tamil Nadu

Questions before the authority

  • Classification of goods i.e. Tapioca flour obtained by crushing the dried roots, and remnants of tapioca roots/tubers.
  • Applicability of Notifications issued under the provisions of Act in respect of goods falling under entry No.78 and Tariff item 1106 of Part A of Exempted goods, and tariff item 1106 in Sl.No.59 of Part C in Schedule I of the said Act.
  • Determination of the liability to pay tax in respect of the said goods, tariff No.1106 as mentioned in Sl.No.78 of Part A of Exempted goods, and Sl.No.59 of Part C of First Schedule to the Act.
  • Whether such trader/ dealer is required to be registered.

Facts

The applicant is a dealer engaged in the purchase and sale of tapioca flour, which they manufacture by drying and crushing the fibrous residue (kappi) obtained after extracting starch from tapioca roots. They contended that this product is classifiable under HSN 1106 and is exempt from tax as it is sold unbranded. The jurisdictional authority argued that the product is a residue of starch manufacturing and should be classified differently.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Classification of productHSN 2303.10
Residues of Starch manufacture and similar residues
Applicability of exemption notificationsNot applicable
The product does not fall under tariff item 1106
Tax liabilityTaxable at 5% (2.5% CGST + 2.5% SGST)
Under Schedule I of Notification No.II(2)/CTR/532(d-4)/2017/G.O.Ms.No.62
Registration requirementLiable to be registered
Subject to conditions prescribed under Section 22 of the GST Act

The Authority ruled that the product is not tapioca flour under HSN 1106 but is instead classifiable as residues of starch manufacture. Consequently, the product is taxable at 5% under HSN 2303.10. The applicant is required to be registered if their aggregate turnover exceeds the prescribed threshold under Section 22 of the CGST Act.

Reasoning

The Authority reasoned that the product is a fibrous residue obtained during the starch extraction process, not flour directly prepared from roots. Therefore, it fits the specific description of **residues of starch manufacturing** under HSN 2303.10 rather than the general category of flour under HSN 1106. The ruling relies on the distinction between primary products and manufacturing residues, noting that the product is used for animal feed and adhesives, not human consumption. It cites Section 22 of the CGST Act regarding registration thresholds.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 98(4) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 98(4) of the TNGST Act, 2017
  • Section 22 of the CGST Act
  • HSN 1106
  • HSN 2303.10
  • Notification No.II(2)/CTR/532(d-4)/2017/G.O.Ms.No.62
  • Circular No. 80/54/2018-GST

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that fibrous residues from starch manufacturing are **taxable at 5% under HSN 2303.10** and do not qualify for the nil-rated exemption applicable to certain flours under HSN 1106. It serves as a warning for traders misclassifying industrial residues as food-grade flours. It does not decide the specific registration status of the applicant, which remains contingent on their actual aggregate turnover.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/25_aar_2023_trading.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 18-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I must pay 5% GST on all tapioca products?

No, this ruling specifically applies to fibrous residues from starch manufacturing. If you sell actual food-grade flour, different rules may apply.

Is this ruling binding on my business in another state?

No. An advance ruling is only legally binding on the applicant and their jurisdictional tax officer. However, it shows how authorities interpret the law, which may influence how your local officer views your classification.

What if my tax officer disagrees with my classification?

If your officer disagrees, they may issue a notice. You would then need to provide evidence that your product matches the description of the goods you are claiming, potentially through lab reports or technical specifications.

Do I need to register for GST if I sell this product?

You must register if your total annual turnover exceeds the threshold set in Section 22 of the CGST Act. This ruling does not change those registration limits.