Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Tamil Nadu

GST Classification for Job Work Involving Your Own Materials

The Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling confirmed that bonding materials to customer-owned parts is a service, not a supply of goods.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No.118/AAR/2023 Dated:29.11.2023
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Oerlikon Friction System asked if bonding carbon strips to metal cores is job work.
  2. The Authority ruled the activity is a supply of service under SAC 9988.
  3. Using your own materials during job work does not change the service classification.

In short

The company asked the Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) whether bonding carbon friction strips to customer-provided metal components counts as a service or a sale of goods. Because the core metal parts belong to the customer, the authority decided the entire process is a job work service under SAC 9988, even though the company provided the carbon material.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses were often unsure if adding their own materials to a customer's product turned a job work service into a composite supply of goods.

What has changed

The ruling clarifies that applying a process to someone else's goods is always a service under GST law. This means you must charge GST at the service rate for job work, rather than the rate for the finished product.

Who this affects

Manufacturers and workshops that perform value-added processes on components supplied by their customers.

An example

Imagine a workshop that receives steel gears from a client to apply a specialized heat-treatment coating. The workshop uses its own chemical coating material for the process. Based on this ruling, the workshop should classify this as a job work service under SAC 9988, not as a sale of coated gears.

What you should do

Review your current billing practices to ensure you are classifying these processes as services. Remember that an Advance Ruling only binds the company that asked and its specific tax officer; it is not a universal law for your business.

If you do nothing

If you misclassify a service as a supply of goods, you may apply the wrong GST rate. This can lead to tax shortfalls, interest charges, and penalties during a GST audit. Your local tax officer may disagree with your classification if it does not align with the nature of the work performed.

The terms explained

Job work
Any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person.
SAC 9988
A specific accounting code used under GST to identify manufacturing services performed on physical inputs owned by others.
Composite supply
A transaction involving two or more taxable supplies that are naturally bundled and provided together in the ordinary course of business.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/S OERLIKON FRICTION SYSTEM (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

Advance Ruling No.118/AAR/2023 Dated:29.11.2023 · Tamil Nadu

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the activity of bonding of carbon material friction strip to Metal components amounts to supply of service(job work) falling under SAC 9988?
  • Whether the activity of bonding of carbon material friction strip to Metal components amounts to composite supply of goods under heading 6815 of the First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act?
  • Whether the activity of bonding of carbon material friction strip to Metal components amounts to composite supply of goods under heading 8708 of the First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act?

Facts

The applicant receives metal components (Synchronizer Cores) from customers under a job work arrangement. They bond imported carbon friction strips to these cores and return the finished Synchronizer rings to the customer. The applicant charges for the cost of the carbon material, conversion costs, and profit.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Classification as job work serviceAmounts to supply of job work services under SAC 9988
None
Classification as composite supply of goods (6815)Not applicable
As discussed in para 6.3
Classification as composite supply of goods (8708)Not applicable
As discussed in para 6.3

The Authority ruled that the activity constitutes a supply of job work services under SAC 9988. It rejected the applicant's contention that the activity could be classified as a composite supply of goods, noting that the entire process is a service of treatment or process applied to another person's goods.

Reasoning

The Authority relied on Section 7 of the CGST Act and Schedule II, which classifies any treatment or process applied to another person's goods as a supply of services. It determined that the activity falls under SAC 9988, which covers manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others. The Authority clarified that the use of the job worker's own materials, such as the carbon strips, does not alter the nature of the activity as a job work service. Consequently, the concept of composite supply of goods was deemed inapplicable.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 2(68) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Schedule II of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Notification No.11/2017-CT(Rate) dated 28.06.2017
  • Circular No.38/12/2018-GST dated 26.03.2018

For the practitioner

This ruling confirms that **job work involving the use of the job worker's own materials** remains classifiable as a service under SAC 9988 rather than a supply of goods. It serves as a precedent for manufacturers performing value-added processes on customer-owned components. Practitioners should note that the ruling emphasizes the **substance of the transaction** over the description used in tax invoices.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/118_oerlikon.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 13-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I can automatically classify my work as a service?

No. This ruling is specific to the company that asked. While it shows how the authority thinks, you should consult with your tax advisor to confirm your specific process qualifies as job work.

What if my local tax officer disagrees with this ruling?

An Advance Ruling is not binding on other businesses or tax officers in different jurisdictions. If your officer takes a different view, you may need to seek your own ruling or provide evidence of how your process fits the legal definition of job work.

Does using my own materials always keep the work as a service?

The authority noted that using your own materials does not change the nature of the activity if the primary purpose is to process the customer's goods. However, the specific facts of your contract matter, so review your agreements carefully.