Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu GST Advance Ruling TN/112/AAR/2023 Withdrawal Explained

The Authority for Advance Ruling allowed the applicant to withdraw their request, meaning no decision was made on job work classification.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No.112/AAR/2023 Dated:10.11.2023
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Butterfly Gandhimathi Appliances Limited requested a ruling on packing goods.
  2. The company asked if sending goods for packing qualifies as job work.
  3. The applicant later requested to withdraw the application entirely.
  4. The Authority granted the withdrawal without issuing a decision on the merits.

In short

The company asked the Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) whether sending finished goods to a vendor for packing into combi-packs counts as job work or a taxable supply under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) law. Before the authority could decide, the company asked to withdraw its application. Because the request was withdrawn, the authority did not provide any guidance or interpretation on how these packing operations should be treated for tax purposes.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often face uncertainty regarding whether specific outsourced activities, like packing or assembly, qualify for the GST job work exemption or must be treated as a taxable supply of goods.

What has changed

Nothing has changed. Because the application was withdrawn, this order does not provide a legal precedent or a new interpretation of GST rules for packing or job work.

Who this affects

Manufacturers or traders who outsource packing, assembly, or finishing services to third-party vendors and are unsure if these arrangements qualify as job work.

What you should do

Do not rely on this order for your own tax planning. An advance ruling is only binding on the business that requested it and its specific tax officer; since this case was withdrawn, it offers no guidance to other businesses at all.

If you do nothing

If you assume this order supports a specific tax position, you risk misclassifying your transactions. A tax officer may disagree with your interpretation, leading to demands for unpaid tax, interest, and penalties. Always seek professional advice based on your specific facts rather than relying on withdrawn or irrelevant rulings.

The terms explained

Job work
Any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person.
Advance ruling
A written decision provided by tax authorities to a business to clarify how GST laws apply to a specific transaction.
Taxable supply
Any sale or transfer of goods or services that is subject to GST under the law.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s BUTTERFLY GANDHIMATHI APPLIANCES LIMITED

Advance Ruling No.112/AAR/2023 Dated:10.11.2023 · Tamil Nadu

Questions before the authority

  • Whether sending finished goods for the purpose of packing in combi-packs by another registered vendor to be returned to us for eventual taxable supply, tantamount to taxable supply in their hands(at the time of sending for packing) or whether such sending can be treated as sending for jobwork.

Facts

The applicant is a manufacturer of domestic appliances and intended to send finished goods to a vendor for packing into combi-packs. They sought a ruling on whether this activity qualifies as job work under the GST law or constitutes a taxable supply. The applicant subsequently requested to withdraw the application as the subject transaction was no longer required.

Ruling

The Authority for Advance Ruling allowed the applicant to withdraw the application. Consequently, no ruling was provided on the merits of the questions raised.

Reasoning

The applicant submitted a letter dated 02.11.2023 requesting the withdrawal of their application. The Authority considered this request and decided to treat the application as withdrawn without examining the merits or detailed facts of the case. No specific provisions were interpreted as the matter was disposed of based on the applicant's request.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 98(4) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 98(4) of the TNGST Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This order provides no guidance on the classification of job work versus taxable supply for combi-pack operations. It serves only as a procedural record of an **application withdrawal**. Practitioners should note that this ruling does not establish a precedent for similar business arrangements.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/112_butterfly_gandhimathi.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 13-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean packing goods is not job work?

No. The authority did not decide on the merits of the case, so this order provides no guidance on whether packing qualifies as job work.

Can I use this order to defend my tax position?

No. This order is a procedural record of a withdrawal and does not establish a legal precedent that you can use to support your tax filings.

Is an advance ruling binding on my business?

No. An advance ruling is only binding on the specific applicant who requested it and the tax authorities assigned to that business.

What should I do if I have a similar question about job work?

You should consult with a tax professional to review your specific business arrangement or consider filing your own application for an advance ruling if you need certainty.