Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Karnataka

GST Advance Ruling: Why You Cannot Use It for Transitional Issues

The Authority for Advance Ruling in Karnataka clarified that it cannot decide on tax issues related to the transition from pre-GST laws.

Ruling
KAR ADRG 09 / 2019 dated 15-05-2019
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Urbanac Projects asked how to adjust service tax paid on pre-GST advances.
  2. The applicant withdrew the request after realizing the forum was inappropriate.
  3. Advance rulings are not meant for resolving transitional tax matters.

In short

The company asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) how to handle service tax paid on advances received before the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime began. The authority did not answer the question because the company withdrew its application, acknowledging that the AAR is not the right place to settle these specific transition-related disputes.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often hoped the AAR could provide clarity on how to carry forward or adjust tax credits and payments from the old service tax system into the new GST framework.

What has changed

The authority confirmed that transitional issues fall outside the scope of the advance ruling process. This means you cannot use this legal route to get a binding answer on how to manage old tax payments or credits under the new GST rules.

Who this affects

Businesses that have pending tax questions or credit adjustments stemming from the old service tax or VAT regimes.

An example

Imagine a construction firm that paid service tax on an advance in 2016 but only completed the work in 2018. They might want to ask the AAR if they can claim a refund or credit for that old tax. Based on this order, the AAR would not answer that question, and the firm would need to seek guidance through regular assessment channels instead.

What you should do

If you have a dispute regarding pre-GST tax adjustments, do not file for an advance ruling as it will not be accepted. This order is not a law that applies to your business; it is a procedural reminder that the AAR will reject applications concerning transitional matters.

If you do nothing

If you file an application for a transitional issue, the authority will likely reject it or ask you to withdraw it, wasting your time and legal fees. Relying on an incorrect assumption about what the AAR can decide may leave your tax position uncertain and vulnerable during a future audit.

The terms explained

Advance Ruling
A formal decision provided by tax authorities to a business to clarify how GST laws apply to their specific transactions.
Transitional matters
Issues or tax credits that arise specifically because a business moved from the old tax system, like service tax, to the current GST system.
Works contract
A service that involves both the supply of goods and labor, commonly seen in construction and infrastructure projects.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s Urbanac Projects Private Limited

KAR ADRG 09 / 2019 dated 15-05-2019 · Karnataka

Questions before the authority

  • How to adjust the Service Tax which has been paid on mobilization advances in Pre-GST regime?

Facts

The applicant is engaged in the business of executing works contract services for residential complexes, commercial properties, and special economic zones. They received mobilization advances in the pre-GST regime and paid service tax on these amounts. The applicant sought an advance ruling on how to adjust this pre-GST service tax payment.

Ruling

The authority did not provide a substantive ruling on the tax question. Instead, the application was disposed of as withdrawn at the request of the applicant. The applicant requested the withdrawal on the grounds that an advance ruling cannot be sought in respect of transitional matters.

Reasoning

The applicant appeared for a hearing and was initially directed to revise their application by reframing the questions. Subsequently, the applicant chose not to file a revised application and instead requested to withdraw the matter. The authority accepted this request, noting the applicant's admission that advance rulings are not maintainable for transitional issues. Consequently, the authority disposed of the application as withdrawn without addressing the merits of the tax question.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017
  • Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017
  • Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017
  • Section 98(4) of CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 98(4) of KGST Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This order serves as a procedural reminder that the **Advance Ruling mechanism is not the appropriate forum** for resolving disputes or seeking guidance on **transitional matters** arising from the shift from pre-GST regimes. Practitioners should note that the authority will permit the withdrawal of an application if it is acknowledged that the subject matter falls outside the scope of Section 97. This ruling does not provide any guidance on the actual adjustment of pre-GST service tax.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/krntk_09-2019_urbanac_projects_pl.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 20-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An advance ruling is only binding on the specific business that asked the question and their local tax office.

Can I use this order to support my claim for a tax refund?

No, this order does not address tax refunds. It only confirms that the AAR is not the correct forum to discuss transitional tax issues.

Where should I go to resolve my pre-GST tax questions?

You should consult with a tax professional to review your specific case or contact your jurisdictional tax officer for guidance on transitional provisions.

Why did the authority allow the company to withdraw the application?

The authority allowed the withdrawal because the applicant admitted that the AAR does not have the legal power to rule on transitional matters under the current GST laws.