Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Tamil Nadu

GST on Water, Maintenance, and Infrastructure Charges: TN/22/AAR/2023

The Authority for Advance Ruling clarified that raw water supply is exempt from GST, while maintenance and infrastructure charges are taxable.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No. 22 /ARA/2023 Dated: 20.06.2023
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Raw water supply is exempt from GST.
  2. Maintenance and infrastructure development charges are taxable services.
  3. Interest on exempt supplies is exempt; interest on taxable supplies is taxable.

In short

The State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) whether various charges collected from industrial park tenants are subject to Goods and Services Tax (GST). The company wanted to know if water supply, maintenance fees, infrastructure charges, and interest on late payments should be taxed. The ruling clarifies which of these receipts are considered taxable services and which qualify for exemptions.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often assumed that charges collected by government-backed industrial corporations might be exempt from GST as part of public infrastructure services.

What has changed

The authority ruled that while raw water supply is exempt, maintenance and infrastructure development charges are taxable services. Crucially, the ruling established that interest and penalties follow the tax status of the main service; if the service is exempt, the interest is too, but if the service is taxable, the interest is also taxable. This means businesses cannot assume all receipts from a government body are tax-free.

Who this affects

Industrial park developers and businesses operating within state-managed industrial estates.

An example

Imagine a private industrial park developer that also charges tenants for common maintenance and water. They might hope to claim an exemption based on this ruling. However, because this ruling is not binding on them, their local tax officer may still demand GST on those maintenance fees. The developer should seek their own professional advice rather than relying on this specific decision.

What you should do

This ruling only applies to the specific company that asked the question. If you are in a similar position, do not automatically stop paying GST on these charges. Consult your tax advisor to review your specific contracts, as the tax treatment depends on how your agreements are structured.

If you do nothing

If you assume this ruling applies to your business and stop paying GST on taxable services, you risk a tax audit. The tax department may issue a demand notice for the unpaid tax plus interest and penalties. Being wrong about your tax liability can lead to significant financial costs and legal disputes.

The terms explained

Advance Ruling
A formal decision provided by tax authorities to a specific business regarding how GST applies to their particular transactions.
Pure Agent
A person who makes a payment to a third party on behalf of a client and is reimbursed for that exact amount without adding a profit margin.
Principal Supply
The main service or good being provided in a transaction, which determines the tax rate for any related incidental charges.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamilnadu Limited

Advance Ruling No. 22 /ARA/2023 Dated: 20.06.2023 · Tamil Nadu

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the Supply of raw water and its incidental charges are liable to be taxed under the prevailing GST Laws.
  • Whether the Maintenance charges for usage of common facilities are liable to be taxed under the prevailing GST Laws.
  • Whether the Participatory Infrastructure Development Scheme (PIDP) charges are liable to be taxed under the prevailing GST Laws.
  • Whether the interest collected towards delayed payment for Upfront lease premium and Differential lease premium are liable to be taxed under the prevailing GST Laws.
  • Whether the interest for delayed payment of consideration for the points mentioned in Sr.No.01 to 03, as above, are liable to be taxed under the GST Laws.
  • Whether the Penalty for delay in execution of the project and delay in execution of lease deed are liable to be taxed under the prevailing GST Laws.

Facts

The applicant is a State Industrial Development Corporation that develops industrial complexes and parks. They provide infrastructure facilities and lease land to allottees, collecting various charges including upfront lease premiums, maintenance fees, and water supply charges. The applicant sought a ruling on the taxability of these various receipts and associated interest or penalty payments under GST.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Supply of raw water and incidental chargesNot liable to be taxed
Principal supply is exempt under Notification No. 02/2017-CT(Rate)
Maintenance charges for common facilitiesLiable to be taxed
Considered a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of CGST Act
Participatory Infrastructure Development Scheme (PIDP) chargesLiable to be taxed
Considered a supply of service under Section 7(1)(a) of CGST Act
Interest on delayed payment of Upfront/Differential lease premiumNot liable to be taxed
Principal supply is exempt under Notification No. 12/2017-CT(Rate)
Interest on delayed payment for points 1 to 3Mixed ruling
Interest on water charges (point 1) is not liable; interest on maintenance/PIDP (points 2 & 3) is liable
Penalty for delay in project/lease deed executionNot liable to be taxed
Linked to exempt upfront lease premium

The authority ruled that the supply of raw water is exempt, and consequently, associated interest and penalties are also exempt. However, maintenance charges and PIDP charges are held to be taxable as supplies of services. Interest on upfront lease premiums is exempt, while interest on taxable supplies like maintenance and PIDP charges is taxable.

Reasoning

The authority determined that the taxability of incidental charges like interest and penalties follows the taxability of the principal supply. Since the supply of raw water and the grant of long-term land leases are exempt, the associated interest and penalties are also exempt. Conversely, maintenance and PIDP charges were found to be taxable services because the applicant failed to prove they acted as a 'pure agent' under Rule 33 of the CGST Rules. The ruling relies on Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act regarding the definition of supply and various exemption notifications.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 7(1)(a) of CGST Act 2017
  • Section 15(2) of CGST Act 2017
  • Rule 33 of CGST Rules 2017
  • Notification No. 02/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
  • Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
  • Circular No. 178/10/2022-GST

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that **incidental charges follow the tax status of the principal supply**. It serves as a warning that claims of 'pure agent' status for maintenance or infrastructure charges will be rejected without formal contractual documentation. It does not provide a blanket exemption for all receipts by industrial development corporations.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/22_aar_2023_sipcot.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 17-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An Advance Ruling is only legally binding on the business that requested it and their specific tax officer.

Does this mean I can stop paying GST on maintenance charges?

No. The ruling specifically found that maintenance charges are taxable services. You should continue to pay GST unless you have a specific ruling for your own business.

What if my tax officer disagrees with my interpretation?

If your tax officer disagrees, they may issue a notice for unpaid taxes. You would then need to defend your position with documentation or pay the tax, interest, and potential penalties.

How can I prove I am a 'pure agent' to avoid tax?

To be a pure agent, you must have a clear contract stating you are acting on behalf of the client and you must not add any profit or markup to the costs you recover. You must also provide proof of the original payments made to third parties.