Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) West Bengal

GST on Transmission Line Projects: Single Works Contract Ruling

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling decided that transmission line construction is a single works contract, not separate supply and service contracts.

Ruling
22/WBAAR/2018-19 dated 26/11/2018
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Skipper Ltd asked if transmission line projects qualify for specific tax exemptions.
  2. The authority ruled the project is an indivisible composite supply.
  3. GST applies to the total value, including materials and erection services.

In short

The company asked if they could split a transmission line project into separate contracts for materials and services to claim a tax exemption. The authority looked at whether these parts were truly independent or part of one larger project. They decided that because the tower is fixed to the ground, the entire project is a single works contract.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often tried to split large infrastructure contracts into separate parts for goods and services to lower their tax burden or claim specific exemptions.

What has changed

The authority confirmed that transmission line projects are treated as a single works contract. This means you cannot separate the supply of materials from the installation services to apply different tax rules; the entire project is taxed as one service.

Who this affects

Construction companies and contractors involved in building transmission lines or similar infrastructure projects.

An example

A construction firm builds a power substation and splits the contract into 'supply of equipment' and 'installation services' to save on GST. Based on this ruling, the tax department would likely view this as one single works contract. The firm would be required to pay GST on the total value of the entire project rather than treating the equipment supply separately.

What you should do

Review your current contracts to see if they mirror this structure. Remember that an advance ruling only binds the company that asked and their specific tax officer; it is not a law that applies to your business automatically.

If you do nothing

If you assume this ruling applies to you and structure your taxes accordingly, you risk a tax audit and penalties. A tax officer may disagree with your classification and demand the full tax amount plus interest. Relying on another company's ruling without professional advice is a significant financial risk.

The terms explained

Works contract
A contract for building, construction, or improvement of immovable property where both goods and services are provided together.
Composite supply
A package of two or more goods or services that are naturally bundled and sold together as a single transaction.
Immovable property
Property that cannot be moved, such as land, buildings, or structures permanently attached to the earth.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

Skipper Ltd

22/WBAAR/2018-19 dated 26/11/2018 · West Bengal

Questions before the authority

  • Applicability of Serial No. 18 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017 to the applicant.

Facts

The applicant, in a joint venture, entered into a contract with PGCIL for the construction and commissioning of a transmission line project, referred to as the Tower Package. The contract was split into two parts: one for the ex-factory supply of materials and another for allied services like erection, testing, and commissioning. The applicant contended that these were separate supplies and sought to claim the benefit of an exemption notification for the service portion.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Applicability of Serial No. 18 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)Not applicable
The arrangement is a single works contract service

The Authority held that the contract constitutes an indivisible composite supply of works contract service. Consequently, the exemption under Serial No. 18 of the notification is not applicable. GST must be paid on the entire value of the works contract, including materials, transportation, insurance, and erection services.

Reasoning

The Authority determined that the Tower Package is an **immovable property** because the towers are erected on foundations and intended for use in perpetuity. It found that the two contracts are interdependent and cannot be executed independently, making them an **indivisible composite supply**. The ruling relied on the definition of works contract under Section 2(119) of the GST Act and the classification of such activities as service under Schedule II. It concluded that transportation and insurance are merely components of the bundled works contract service.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 97(2)(b) of the CGST/WBGST Acts, 2017
  • Section 2(52) of the GST Act
  • Section 2(119) of the GST Act
  • Section 7(1)(d) of the GST Act
  • Section 10(1)(a) and (d) of the IGST Act, 2017
  • Schedule II to the GST Act
  • Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017

For the practitioner

This ruling confirms that splitting a transmission line project into separate supply and service contracts does not prevent it from being classified as a **single works contract**. Practitioners should note that such projects are treated as immovable property, precluding the separate taxation of goods and services. It settles the issue of bundling for transmission tower projects but does not apply to scenarios where the contract is genuinely separable.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/wbaar-22-2018-19_26.11.18-sl.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 21-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I must pay GST on the full project value?

Yes, if your project is classified as an indivisible works contract, the entire value is subject to GST as a service.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An advance ruling is only legally binding for the company that requested it and their specific tax jurisdiction.

What if my tax officer disagrees with my contract classification?

Your tax officer has the authority to reclassify your contract if they believe it is a composite supply, which could lead to tax demands and penalties.

Can I still split my contracts to save tax?

This ruling suggests that splitting contracts for transmission lines will not change their classification as a single works contract. You should consult with a tax professional before structuring your agreements.