Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Madhya Pradesh

GST Classification for Bus Body Building on Customer Chassis

The Authority for Advance Ruling decided that building a bus body on a customer's chassis is a service, not a supply of goods.

Ruling
Order Number 03/2019 dated 10.04.19
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Rohan Coach Builders asked if bus body building is goods or services.
  2. The Authority ruled it is a service under SAC 998881.
  3. The activity is taxable at 18% GST.

In short

The company asked whether building a bus body on a chassis provided by a client counts as selling goods or providing a service. Because the client keeps ownership of the chassis, the authority decided this is a job work service rather than the sale of a complete vehicle.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses were often unsure if this activity should be taxed as a supply of goods (the bus) or a supply of services (the fabrication work).

What has changed

The authority confirmed this is a service taxable at 18%. This means businesses must classify their invoices as job work services rather than goods sales, provided they do not own the chassis.

Who this affects

Automotive fabricators and bus body builders who work on chassis supplied by their clients.

An example

A local fabrication shop, 'City Bus Works', builds bodies on chassis sent by a bus manufacturer. They were unsure if they should charge GST as if they were selling a bus. Based on this ruling, they should classify their work as a service and charge 18% GST on the fabrication fee.

What you should do

This ruling only applies to the business that asked for it. If you perform similar work, use this as a guide for how the department views the law, but consult your own tax advisor to confirm your specific tax treatment.

If you do nothing

If you incorrectly classify your work as a supply of goods when it is a service, you may face issues with input tax credit claims or incorrect tax filings. A tax officer could demand the difference in tax or impose penalties for misclassification. Never assume a ruling for another company protects you from an audit.

The terms explained

Job work
Any treatment or process undertaken by a person on goods belonging to another registered person.
SAC
Services Accounting Code, a system used to classify services for GST purposes.
Chassis
The base frame of a vehicle, including the engine and wheels, upon which the body is built.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. Rohan Coach Builders

Order Number 03/2019 dated 10.04.19 · Madhya Pradesh

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the activity of building and mounting of the body on the chassis provided by the principal will result in supply of goods under HSN 8707 or supply of services under HSN 9988 taxable at 18%.

Facts

The applicant is engaged in the fabrication of bus bodies on chassis supplied by OEMs or other principals. The ownership of the chassis remains with the principal at all times, and the applicant performs the fabrication work using their own inputs and services. The applicant seeks to clarify the taxability of this activity, specifically whether it constitutes a supply of goods or a supply of services.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Fabrication of bus body on principal's chassisSupply of services
Taxable at 18% under SAC 998881

The Authority ruled that the activity of fabricating a bus body on a chassis supplied by the principal constitutes a supply of services. It is classified under SAC 998881 as manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others. The activity is taxable at 18% GST.

Reasoning

The ruling relies on the definition of job work under Section 2(68) of the CGST Act and the clarification provided in CBIC Circular no. 52/26/2018-GST. The Authority determined that since the ownership of the chassis is not transferred to the applicant, the activity qualifies as job work. Consequently, it falls under the category of manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others, which is distinct from the supply of a complete bus.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 2(68) of the CGST/SGST Act
  • Section 97(2) of the CGST/SGST Act
  • Section 98 of the CGST/SGST Act
  • Section 103(2) of the CGST/SGST Act
  • Section 104(1) of the CGST/SGST Act
  • Section 143 of the CGST/SGST Act
  • Schedule II of the CGST Act
  • CBIC Circular no. 52/26/2018-GST

For the practitioner

This ruling confirms that bus body building on a chassis provided by a principal is a **supply of services** taxable at 18% rather than a supply of goods. It provides clarity for job workers in the automotive sector by distinguishing between the supply of a complete vehicle and the provision of fabrication services. Practitioners should note that this classification is strictly contingent on the **non-transfer of ownership** of the chassis.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/mp-03-2019-rc_builders.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 20-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An advance ruling is only legally binding on the business that requested it and their specific tax officer.

Does this mean I must charge 18% GST?

Yes, for this specific type of job work service, the authority confirmed the 18% rate applies.

What if my tax officer disagrees with this ruling?

Since this ruling is not a law that applies to everyone, your tax officer is not required to follow it. You should discuss your specific situation with a professional to ensure your tax position is defensible.

Does ownership of the chassis matter?

Yes, it is the most important factor. The ruling relies on the fact that the fabricator does not own the chassis.