Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Madhya Pradesh

GST Exemption for Skill Development Training Services in Madhya Pradesh

The Authority for Advance Ruling decided that private training partners providing services to a society are not eligible for GST tax exemptions.

Ruling
Order Number 04/2019 dated 10.04.19
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. The company asked if their training services were exempt from GST.
  2. The exemption applies only to services provided directly to government bodies.
  3. The Authority ruled that a society is not automatically considered the government.
  4. The exemption claim was denied because the service recipient was a society.

In short

The company asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) if their skill development training services for the Uttar Pradesh Skill Development Society (UPSDS) qualified for a GST exemption. The law provides tax relief for training services, but only when provided directly to the Central or State Government. The Authority had to decide if a society counts as the government for these tax purposes.

What has changed

How it worked before

Many private training partners assumed that providing services to government-affiliated societies or autonomous bodies would qualify for the same tax exemptions as services provided directly to government departments.

What has changed

The Authority ruled that the exemption is strictly for services provided to the government itself. Because the company could not prove the society was an arm of the government, they must pay GST on their services. This means private partners working with societies cannot assume their services are tax-exempt.

Who this affects

Private training partners and vocational training providers working with government-affiliated societies or autonomous bodies.

An example

Imagine a private firm, SkillTrain Pvt Ltd, provides training to a state-run sports society. They might wonder if they can stop charging GST based on this ruling. This ruling suggests that unless they can prove the society is legally part of the government, they must continue to charge and pay GST.

What you should do

If you provide similar services, do not assume you are exempt from GST. An advance ruling only binds the company that asked and its specific tax officer. You should consult with a tax professional to review your specific contract and the legal status of the entity you serve before deciding not to collect GST.

If you do nothing

If you stop charging GST based on this ruling and a tax officer disagrees, you will be liable for the unpaid tax plus interest and penalties. Tax authorities may view this as tax evasion. Relying on a ruling that does not apply to your specific situation is a significant financial risk.

The terms explained

Advance Ruling
A formal decision from tax authorities on how GST law applies to a specific business situation. It is only binding for the business that requested it.
Exemption
A legal provision that allows a business to not pay or collect tax on specific services or goods.
Entity
A business, organization, or society that is recognized as a separate legal unit.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. Network For Information & Computer

Order Number 04/2019 dated 10.04.19 · Madhya Pradesh

Questions before the authority

  • Whether exemption provided under Sr. No. 72 of Not. No. 12/2017 Central Tax(Rate), dated 28-06-17 issued by the Central Government under CGST Act, 2017 and exemption provided under Sr. No. 72 of Not. No. FA-3-42/2017/1/V(53) dated 30-06-2017 issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government under M.P. Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 is applicable to the applicant?
  • Whether services provided by the applicant fall under Sr. No. 72 of the Not. No. 12/2017 Central Tax(Rate), dated 28-06-17 issued by the Central Government under CGST Act, 2017 and exemption provided under Sr. No. 72 of Not. No. FA-3-42/2017/1/V(53) dated 30-06-2017 issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government under M.P. Goods and Service Tax Act 2017?

Facts

The applicant is a registered entity providing skill development training services to the Uttar Pradesh Skill Development Society (UPSDS). They sought an advance ruling on whether these services qualify for the tax exemption provided under Serial Number 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The applicant acts as a private training partner for the UPSDS.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Applicability of exemption under Sr. No. 72Not applicable
Services must be provided to Central or State Government or Union Territory Administration

The Authority ruled that the applicant is not entitled to the benefit of the exemption. It held that the exemption is only available if the services are provided directly to the Central Government, State Government, or Union Territory Administration. Since the applicant provided services to a society and failed to prove it was an arm of the government, the exemption was denied.

Reasoning

The ruling turned on the interpretation of the condition in Serial Number 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), which requires services to be provided to the Central Government, State Government, or Union Territory Administration. The Authority found that the applicant provided services to a society, UPSDS, and failed to provide evidence that this society constitutes the government. Consequently, the conditions for the exemption were not met. The Authority emphasized that the intent of the legislature is to exempt services provided directly to government bodies under specific training programs.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 97(2)(b) of the CGST Act 2017
  • Section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017
  • Section 11(1) of the CGST Act 2017
  • Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017
  • Notification No. FA-3-42/2017/1/V(53) dated 30.06.2017

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that the **exemption for training services** under Serial Number 72 is strictly limited to services provided directly to government entities. It serves as a warning to private training partners that providing services to societies or autonomous bodies may not qualify for the exemption unless they can prove the entity is effectively the government. It does not decide the taxability of services provided to other types of government-affiliated organizations.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/mp-04-2019-network_for_info_comp.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 20-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I can stop charging GST on my training services?

No. This ruling only applies to the company that asked the question. You must evaluate your own contracts and the legal status of your clients to determine your tax liability.

Is this ruling binding on my tax officer?

No. An advance ruling is only binding on the applicant and the tax officer assigned to that specific case. Your local tax officer is not required to follow this decision.

How do I know if my client is considered the government?

You should review the legal formation documents of your client. If you are unsure, consult a tax professional to determine if your client qualifies as a government body under the GST law.

What if my client claims they are a government body?

A client's claim does not override tax law. You are responsible for collecting the correct amount of GST, so you should verify their status independently or seek professional advice.