Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Rajasthan

GST on Shifting Utility Infrastructure: Rajasthan AAR Ruling

The Authority for Advance Ruling decided that shifting power lines for highway projects is not a taxable supply of goods under GST.

Ruling
ADVANCE RULING NO. RAJ/AAR/2019-20/09 dated 28.05.2019
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. NHAI asked if shifting power lines constitutes a taxable asset transfer.
  2. The Authority ruled that these lines are immovable property, not goods.
  3. No GST is payable because the activity is not a supply.

In short

The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) asked the Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) if moving power lines for road projects counts as a taxable supply under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) law. Because the power lines are fixed to the earth, the authority decided they are immovable property rather than goods. Since the activity does not meet the definition of a supply, it falls outside the scope of GST.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses were uncertain whether relocating utility infrastructure like power lines or pipelines during construction projects triggered a GST liability on the transfer of assets.

What has changed

The ruling clarifies that shifting utility infrastructure that results in immovable property is not a supply of goods. This means businesses do not need to pay GST on the value of the infrastructure itself when it is relocated for public works.

Who this affects

Construction companies, infrastructure developers, and utility providers involved in shifting fixed assets for government or private projects.

An example

A private road developer needs to move water pipelines owned by a local municipal body to widen a highway. The developer pays for the relocation but the pipes remain the property of the municipality. Based on this ruling, the developer would argue that the relocation is not a taxable supply of goods because the pipes are immovable property and no ownership transfer occurred.

What you should do

This ruling only applies to the specific business that asked the question and its local tax office. If you are in a similar situation, you cannot automatically rely on this decision; you should consult with a tax professional to evaluate your specific contract and project details.

If you do nothing

If you assume this ruling applies to your business and stop paying GST on similar transactions, you risk a tax demand from your local officer. If the officer disagrees with your interpretation, you may face penalties and interest charges for unpaid taxes. Always seek a professional opinion tailored to your specific facts.

The terms explained

Goods
Under GST law, this refers to movable property. It does not include money or securities, but it does include things like machinery or inventory.
Immovable Property
Assets that are permanently attached to the earth, such as buildings, land, or fixed utility lines, which cannot be moved without significant alteration.
Supply
Any form of sale, transfer, or exchange made for a price in the course of business that triggers a GST liability.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s National Highway Authority of India (Regional Office)

ADVANCE RULING NO. RAJ/AAR/2019-20/09 dated 28.05.2019 · Rajasthan

Questions before the authority

  • Whether there is any 'Asset Transfer' involved which is a supply leviable to GST in the work of shifting & raising of transmission lines owned by RVPNL by NHAI in the course of widening, modification & diversification of its highways after completion of this work?
  • Without prejudice to the submissions made above, if there is an 'Asset transfer' which is a Supply under GST, then who is liable to pay GST?
  • If above GST is to be paid by the Applicant, then the same will be exempt vide Entry 4 of Notification no. 12/2017- Central Tax (rate) dated 28.06.2017?

Facts

The applicant, NHAI, is undertaking the widening and modification of national highways. This process requires the shifting or raising of existing power transmission lines owned by Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited (RVPNL) to ensure safe electrical clearances. NHAI bears the cost of this modification work, and the question arises whether this activity constitutes an 'Asset Transfer' that is a taxable supply under GST.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Whether the activity is an 'Asset Transfer' leviable to GSTNo
The constructed assets do not qualify as 'goods' under the GST Act

The Authority ruled that the assets constructed by the applicant do not fall under the category of 'goods' as defined under the GST Act. Consequently, the activity does not constitute a supply, and therefore, no GST is leviable on the transaction.

Reasoning

The Authority reasoned that the power transmission lines constructed by the applicant are immovable property and do not meet the definition of 'goods' under Section 2(52) of the GST Act. Furthermore, it observed that the element of consideration is absent in the transfer of these assets, as the ownership remains with RVPNL. Since the activity does not qualify as a supply under Section 7 of the GST Act, the provisions regarding the transfer of business assets under Schedule II are not applicable.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 97(2)(e) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017
  • Section 97(2)(g) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017
  • Section 7 of the GST Act, 2017
  • Section 2(52) of the GST Act, 2017
  • Section 2(31) of the GST Act, 2017
  • Schedule II of the GST Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This ruling provides relief to entities like NHAI by clarifying that the **shifting and raising of utility infrastructure** that results in immovable property does not constitute a taxable supply of goods. It settles that such activities, where no consideration is involved and the asset is not 'goods', are **outside the scope of GST**. Practitioners should note this does not address the taxability of the separate supervision or shut-down services provided by the utility company, which the applicant acknowledged as taxable.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/raj.aar-2019-20_09-nhai.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 20-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I never pay GST on utility shifting?

No. This ruling only covers the transfer of the asset itself. If you pay a utility company for services like supervision or temporary power shutdowns, those service fees are still likely taxable.

Is this ruling binding on my tax officer in another state?

No. An Advance Ruling is only binding on the applicant and the tax authorities in the state where it was issued. It serves as a guide for how authorities might think, but it is not law for your business.

What if my contract involves a transfer of ownership?

This ruling specifically noted that ownership remained with the original utility provider. If your contract involves transferring ownership of the assets, the tax treatment could be entirely different.