Gujarat GST Advance Ruling GUJ/GAAR/R/2019/1: Procedural Withdrawal
This ruling provides no legal guidance because the applicant withdrew their request before a decision was made.
- Ruling
- ORDER No. 11 /AAR/2019 DATED 27.02.2019
- Authority
- Authority for Advance Ruling
This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.
The short version
- The National Dairy Development Board asked about GST input tax credit timing.
- The board also asked about refund eligibility under an inverted duty structure.
- The applicant requested to withdraw the application before the authority ruled.
- The authority dismissed the case without addressing the legal questions.
In short
The National Dairy Development Board asked the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR) for clarity on when they could claim input tax credit and refunds for their water pump business. Before the authority could issue a decision, the board asked to withdraw their application. Because the case was withdrawn, the authority did not provide any answers or legal interpretations.
What has changed
How it worked before
Businesses often look to advance rulings to understand how tax authorities interpret rules regarding the timing of input tax credit claims and refunds for inverted duty structures.
What has changed
Nothing changed. Because the application was withdrawn, this order does not set a precedent or provide any guidance on GST law.
Who this affects
Businesses operating under an inverted duty structure who are unsure about the timing of their input tax credit or refund claims.
An example
Imagine a manufacturer of solar panels who faces an inverted duty structure and wants to know if they can claim a refund for accumulated credit. They might look at this ruling hoping for an answer. However, because this ruling was withdrawn, it provides no help to the solar panel manufacturer. They must seek their own professional advice or file their own application if they need a formal answer.
What you should do
Do not rely on this document for tax planning. An advance ruling only binds the specific business that asked the question and its own tax office; since this case was withdrawn, it offers no guidance to anyone else.
If you do nothing
If you assume this document provides a legal rule, you risk making incorrect tax filings. A tax officer is not bound by this order and may disagree with your interpretation, leading to potential penalties or interest charges for incorrect claims.
The terms explained
- Input tax credit
- The tax a business pays on its purchases that it can use to reduce the tax it owes on its sales.
- Inverted duty structure
- A situation where the tax rate on the materials a business buys is higher than the tax rate on the product it sells.
- Advance ruling
- A formal decision from the tax authority on how GST law applies to a specific business transaction.
The ruling in detail
Authority for Advance Ruling
M/s. Texmo Industries
ORDER No. 11 /AAR/2019 DATED 27.02.2019 · Gujarat
Questions before the authority
- Whether it is admissible to take input tax credit in respect of an input (invoice) at any time within the limitation prescribed under Section 16(4) i.e., before the due date of furnishing of return under Section 39 of the TNSGST/CGST Act, for the month September following the end of the financial year to which such return relates or furnishing annual return whichever is earlier.
- Whether, in cases of inverted duty structure as that of the applicant, it is admissible to avail input tax credit on an input (invoice) before the period prescribed for taking credit under Section 16(4) of GST Act.
- Whether, in cases of inverted duty structure as that of the applicant, it is admissible to claim refund of the accumulated credit availed before the period prescribed for taking credit under Section 16(4) of GST Act.
Facts
The applicant is a partnership firm engaged in the manufacture of power-driven water pumps. They operate under an inverted duty structure where the tax rate on inputs (18%-28%) is higher than the tax rate on their output (12%), leading to a perennial accumulation of unutilized input tax credit. The applicant sought an advance ruling regarding the timing of availing input tax credit and the subsequent eligibility to claim a refund of the accumulated credit.
Ruling
| Question | What the authority ruled |
|---|---|
| Admissibility of ITC and refund under inverted duty structure | Dismissed as withdrawn The applicant requested withdrawal of the application before a ruling was issued. |
The authority did not provide a ruling on the merits of the questions presented. The application was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the applicant.
Reasoning
The applicant initially sought clarification on the timing of input tax credit and refund eligibility under an inverted duty structure. During the proceedings, the applicant was granted multiple opportunities to be heard and was asked to submit specific invoices and documentation to support their request. Subsequently, the applicant filed a letter dated 15.02.2019 requesting the withdrawal of their application. Consequently, the authority dismissed the application as withdrawn without addressing the legal questions.
Provisions relied on
- Section 98 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
- Section 16(4) of the CGST Act
- Section 54(3)(ii) of the SGST and CGST Act
- Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 and SGST Rules 2017
For the practitioner
This order is **procedural only** and does not provide any legal interpretation regarding the timing of input tax credit or refund claims under an inverted duty structure. It serves as a record that the applicant chose not to pursue their request for an advance ruling. Practitioners should note that this document **does not establish a precedent** on the substantive issues raised.
Source
This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.
Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/tn-11-aar-2019-texmo_industries_0.pdf
Legibility of the scan, as read: high.
Prepared 20-10-2026.
About Patron Accounting LLP
Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.
Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.
We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:
- Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
- Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
- Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
- Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
- Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009
If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.