Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Karnataka

GST Input Tax Credit on Land Filling Pits: KAR/ADRG/46.1/2020

The Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling decided that land filling pits are civil structures and ineligible for GST input tax credit.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 46.1/2020 dated 30-07-2021
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Mother Earth Environ Tech asked if a land filling pit is plant and machinery.
  2. The authority ruled the pit is a civil structure, not plant and machinery.
  3. Input tax credit on construction costs for the pit is blocked under GST law.

In short

The company asked if they could claim input tax credit (ITC) on the construction of a land filling pit used for waste management. They argued the pit functions as machinery, but the tax authority disagreed, classifying it as a civil structure instead.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses were uncertain if large-scale industrial pits could be classified as plant and machinery to claim tax credits on construction expenses.

What has changed

The authority confirmed that pits embedded in the earth are immovable civil structures. Under Section 17(5)(d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, you cannot claim input tax credit on goods or services used to construct immovable property.

Who this affects

Waste management companies and businesses building large-scale industrial pits or similar civil infrastructure.

An example

GreenWaste Solutions builds a new hazardous waste disposal pit. They want to claim the GST paid on cement and engineering services as input tax credit. Based on this ruling, they should expect their claim to be rejected because the pit is considered a civil structure, not machinery.

What you should do

Do not assume you can claim input tax credit on similar construction projects. This ruling only binds the company that asked; your local tax officer may still have a different view, but this decision shows how the department interprets the law.

If you do nothing

If you claim input tax credit on such structures and the tax department disagrees, they may issue a demand notice for the tax amount plus interest and penalties. Relying on a ruling that does not apply to your specific case can lead to costly legal disputes.

The terms explained

Input Tax Credit (ITC)
The tax a business pays on its purchases that it can use to reduce the tax it owes on its own sales.
Civil Structure
A construction project, such as a building or a pit, that is fixed to the ground and is not considered movable machinery.
Plant and Machinery
Equipment or apparatus used for business operations that is generally eligible for tax credits, excluding land, buildings, and civil structures.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. Mother Earth Environ Tech Pvt Ltd.

Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 46.1/2020 dated 30-07-2021 · Karnataka

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the term 'other civil structure' used in the definition of 'Plant and Machinery' restricts the Land filling Pit from considering it as Plant & Machinery and thereby restricts ITC to be availed on it.

Facts

The applicant is engaged in the business of solid waste management and has constructed a land filling pit for the processing and disposal of hazardous waste. They sought an advance ruling on whether they are eligible to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the goods and services used for the construction of this land filling pit. The applicant contends that the pit qualifies as 'plant and machinery' and is not an excluded 'civil structure' under the GST law.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Eligibility of ITC on Land filling PitThe Landfilling pit is a civil structure and not a plant or machinery.
ITC is not available under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017.

The Authority for Advance Ruling held that the land filling pit is a civil structure and does not qualify as plant and machinery. Consequently, the applicant is not entitled to claim input tax credit on the goods and services used for its construction. The ruling emphasizes that the structure is an immovable property excluded from the definition of plant and machinery.

Reasoning

The Authority relied on the definition of 'plant and machinery' provided in the Explanation to Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, which explicitly excludes 'land, building or any other civil structures'. It observed that the land filling pit involves extensive civil engineering work and is embedded in the earth, thereby attaining the character of an immovable property. The Authority concluded that the structure does not meet the criteria for 'plant and machinery' and falls squarely within the exclusion clause for civil structures. Therefore, the input tax credit is blocked under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 17(5)(d) of the KGST Act, 2017
  • Section 98(4) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 98(4) of the KGST Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that **land filling pits** are considered **civil structures** and are ineligible for ITC under the GST regime. It serves as a negative precedent for taxpayers attempting to classify large-scale environmental infrastructure as 'plant and machinery' to bypass the **Section 17(5)(d) exclusion**. Practitioners should note that this ruling reinforces a strict interpretation of the exclusion clause for immovable property.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/kar_aar_46.1_2020_motherearthenvirontechpvtltd.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 20-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I can never claim ITC on any waste management equipment?

No. This ruling specifically applies to the land filling pit. If you purchase actual machinery or equipment that is not a civil structure, you may still be eligible for input tax credit.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An advance ruling is only legally binding on the business that requested it and the tax authorities dealing with that specific case.

What if my tax officer disagrees with this ruling?

Since this ruling is not a law that applies to everyone, your tax officer is not required to follow it. They will make a decision based on their interpretation of the GST law as it applies to your specific business.

Can I use this ruling to support my claim for ITC?

You can use it as a reference to understand how the authority thinks, but it is a negative ruling. It shows that the department is likely to reject claims for input tax credit on civil structures like pits.