Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Gujarat

GST on Canteen Deductions for Employees and Contract Workers

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling decided that canteen deductions from direct employees are not taxable, but deductions from contract workers are.

Ruling
ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/2025/49 dated 19.11.2025
Dated
19 Nov 2025
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Deductions from direct employees are not a supply under GST.
  2. Recoveries from contract workers are considered a taxable supply.
  3. The ruling relies on the existence of an employer-employee relationship.

In short

Zydus Hospira Oncology Private Limited asked if recovering canteen costs from employees and contract workers counts as a taxable supply under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses were often unsure if recovering any portion of canteen costs from staff or contractors triggered a GST liability.

What has changed

The authority ruled that because direct employees have an employer-employee relationship, their canteen deductions are not a supply. However, since the company does not have that same relationship with contract workers, recovering costs from them is a taxable service.

Who this affects

Companies that provide canteen facilities to both direct staff and third-party contract workers.

An example

A manufacturing firm provides meals to its staff and security guards hired through an agency. The firm deducts a small amount from the guards' pay for these meals. Based on this ruling, the firm would likely need to pay GST on the amounts recovered from the security guards, even though the deductions from their own staff remain exempt.

What you should do

This ruling only applies to the company that asked for it. If your business has a similar setup, you should consult your tax advisor to see if your specific contracts create an employer-employee relationship that might exempt your deductions.

If you do nothing

If you assume this ruling applies to you and stop paying GST on contract worker deductions, you risk a tax demand from your local officer. You may be required to pay the unpaid tax plus interest and penalties if the department disagrees with your interpretation.

The terms explained

Supply
Any form of sale, transfer, or exchange of goods or services made for a price that attracts GST.
Employer-employee relationship
A formal legal connection where a company has direct control and supervision over a worker, which often exempts certain benefits from tax.
Taxable supply
A transaction that is subject to GST under the law.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. Zydus Hospira Oncology Private Limited

ADVANCE RULING NO. GUJ/GAAR/R/2025/49 dated 19.11.2025 · Gujarat

Questions before the authority

  • Whether subsidized deduction made by the applicant from the employees and workers towards canteen facility provided by the canteen service provider at the canteen facility would be considered as a 'supply' by the applicant under the provisions of Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017 and GGST Act, 2017.
  • In case answer to above is yes, Whether GST is payable on the amount recovered as deduction from the salaries of employees to worker contractors or an open market value?

Facts

The applicant is a pharmaceutical company that provides canteen facilities to its employees and contractual workers through a third-party canteen service provider. The applicant recovers a portion of the meal costs from the employees' salaries and from the payments made to the contractors for the contractual workers. The applicant treats the balance amount as a staff welfare expense.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Whether subsidized deduction from employees is a supplyNo
Not considered a supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act
Whether subsidized deduction from contractual workers is a supplyYes
Considered a supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act
Whether GST is payable on the amount recovered from contractual workersYes
GST is payable on the amount recovered as deduction from the payment to the worker's contractor

The authority held that the subsidized deduction from employees does not constitute a 'supply' under the CGST Act. However, the recovery of amounts from contractual workers for canteen services is considered a 'supply' and is liable to GST.

Reasoning

The authority relied on the **employer-employee relationship** to exclude the deduction from employees from the scope of supply, citing Schedule III of the CGST Act and CBIC Circular No. 172/04/2022-GST. Regarding contractual workers, the authority determined that no such relationship exists, as the applicant has no control or supervision over them. Consequently, the recovery of canteen charges from contractual workers is treated as a **taxable supply** of service, incidental to the applicant's business, under Section 7 of the CGST Act.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 2(17) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 2(31) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 2(83) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948
  • Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017
  • CBIC Circular No. 172/04/2022-GST dated 06.07.2022

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that while canteen deductions from direct employees are exempt from GST as perquisites, similar deductions from **contractual workers** are taxable. Practitioners should note that the authority strictly interprets the **employer-employee relationship** based on the terms of the contract with the service provider. It confirms that the applicant's lack of administrative control over contractual workers makes the canteen facility a taxable supply in that specific context.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/49_zydus_hospira_oncology_pvtltd_compressed.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 14-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An Advance Ruling is only binding on the company that requested it and the tax authorities for that specific case.

Why are contract workers treated differently than employees?

The law views direct employees as part of the company, whereas contract workers are seen as external parties because the company does not have direct administrative control over them.

What if my tax officer disagrees with this approach?

Since this ruling is not a law that applies to everyone, your local tax officer is free to form their own view based on your specific contracts and the GST Act.

Should I change how I handle GST on canteen deductions?

You should review your current contracts and tax filings with a professional to ensure your treatment of canteen recoveries aligns with the law and your specific business structure.