Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Gujarat

GST Input Tax Credit on Customs Differential Duty Payments

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling decided that differential customs duty paid via a challan does not qualify for Input Tax Credit.

Ruling
GUJ/GAAR/R/2025/53 dated 24.11.2025
Dated
24 Nov 2025
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Trishul Die and Engineering Works asked if they could claim ITC on differential duty.
  2. The company paid extra IGST following a customs pre-notice consultation letter.
  3. The Authority ruled that a payment challan is not a valid document for ITC.
  4. The claim for Input Tax Credit was denied.

In short

The company asked if they could claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) on extra Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) paid after receiving a customs pre-notice consultation letter. The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) examined whether a payment challan serves as a valid document to claim this credit under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act. They concluded that such payments do not meet the legal requirements for claiming ITC.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often assumed that any payment of IGST to the government, including differential duty paid via challan, could be claimed as Input Tax Credit.

What has changed

The Authority decided that a pre-notice consultation letter and the associated payment challan are not valid documents for claiming ITC. In practice, this means you cannot simply pay the difference and claim the credit; you must ensure the Bill of Entry is formally re-assessed by customs authorities so the data transmits correctly to the GST portal.

Who this affects

Importers who pay differential IGST following customs inquiries or pre-notice consultations.

An example

Imagine a business, 'Precision Tools India', pays extra IGST after a customs audit identifies a valuation error. They receive a payment challan but do not request a formal re-assessment of their Bill of Entry. Based on this ruling, Precision Tools India cannot claim the ITC for that payment. They would need to have the Bill of Entry officially amended by customs to make the credit claim valid.

What you should do

If you are in a similar situation, do not assume you can claim ITC based on a payment challan. An advance ruling only binds the business that asked and its specific tax office. You should consult with your tax advisor to ensure your Bill of Entry is properly re-assessed by customs to support any future ITC claim.

If you do nothing

If you claim ITC based on an invalid document, you risk a tax demand, interest, and penalties during an audit. A tax officer may view this as an incorrect claim and initiate recovery proceedings. Relying on a ruling that does not apply to your specific case can lead to costly legal disputes.

The terms explained

Input Tax Credit
A system that allows businesses to reduce the tax they pay on their sales by the amount of tax they already paid on their business purchases.
Bill of Entry
A legal document filed by an importer to declare the goods being brought into the country and the tax due on them.
Pre-notice consultation
A process where customs authorities discuss potential duty shortfalls with an importer before issuing a formal legal notice.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

Hansaben Jayantibhai Patel [Trade Name:- Trishul Die and Engineering Works]

GUJ/GAAR/R/2025/53 dated 24.11.2025 · Gujarat

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the applicant is able to avail the Input Tax Credit of Rs. 27,14,559/- Integrated Tax paid against the pre-notice consultation letter under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 in terms of the time line prescribed in Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017?

Facts

The applicant imported machinery and initially claimed a lower rate of IGST. Following a pre-consultation letter from Customs authorities, the applicant paid the differential IGST and interest via a challan. The applicant subsequently sought an advance ruling on whether this payment of differential duty entitles them to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the CGST Act.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Eligibility to avail ITC on differential IGST paid against pre-notice consultation letterNo, the applicant cannot avail the Input Tax Credit.
The question of applicability of the time limit under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act was not answered.

The Authority ruled that the applicant cannot avail the Input Tax Credit for the differential IGST paid against a pre-notice consultation letter. Because the document is not a valid document for claiming ITC under the GST law, the question regarding the time limit under Section 16(4) was not answered.

Reasoning

The Authority held that neither a pre-consultation letter nor a duty-paying challan qualifies as a valid document for availing ITC under Section 16(2) of the CGST Act read with Rule 36 of the CGST Rules. It reasoned that such documents do not fall within the scope of 'any similar document' prescribed under the Customs Act for the purpose of claiming ITC. The ruling relied on the principle of ejusdem generis to interpret the scope of Rule 36(1)(d). Furthermore, it cited previous rulings and Board circulars to emphasize that payment via a TR-6 challan does not constitute a valid basis for ITC.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 16(2) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Rule 36(1)(d) of the CGST Rules, 2017
  • Section 28(1) of the Customs Act, 1962
  • Circular No. 16/2023-Customs dated 07.06.2023

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that **differential duty payments** made pursuant to pre-notice consultation letters or via TR-6 challans do not constitute valid documents for claiming ITC under the GST framework. Practitioners should note that the Authority strictly interprets the list of documents prescribed in Rule 36. This decision reinforces that taxpayers must ensure proper **re-assessment of the Bill of Entry** by Customs authorities to enable electronic transmission to the GST portal if they intend to claim ITC on differential duty.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/53_trishul_die_and_engineering_works.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 14-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An advance ruling is only legally binding on the business that requested it and the tax authorities overseeing that specific case.

Can I use this ruling to support my own ITC claim?

No, this ruling actually works against the ability to claim ITC using only a payment challan. It clarifies that you need a formal re-assessment of the Bill of Entry.

What is the correct way to claim ITC on differential duty?

You must ensure the Bill of Entry is formally re-assessed by the customs department. This allows the correct information to flow to the GST portal, which is the standard way to claim credit.

What if my local tax officer disagrees with this ruling?

Since this ruling is not a law that applies to everyone, your tax officer is not required to follow it. However, they may use the same logic to deny your claim if you rely on a payment challan instead of a re-assessed Bill of Entry.