Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Tamil Nadu

GST Registration for Goods Sold Abroad by Indian Companies

The Authority for Advance Ruling decided that selling goods between two Indian entities requires GST registration, even if the goods never enter India.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No.56/AAR/2025, dated 21.11.2025
Dated
21 Nov 2025
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. The company asked for classification of goods sold directly from abroad to customers.
  2. The Authority rejected most questions due to a lack of specific product details.
  3. The ruling confirms that sales between two Indian entities are taxable in India.
  4. GST registration is mandatory for these transactions under the CGST Act.

In short

Snag & Bag Retail Private Ltd asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) how to handle GST for goods they buy from foreign vendors and sell to other Indian companies without the goods ever touching Indian soil. The company wanted to know if these sales were exempt or required registration. The Authority ruled that because the buyer and seller are both in India, the transaction is a taxable supply that requires GST registration.

What has changed

How it worked before

Many businesses assumed that if goods move directly from a foreign country to another foreign country, the transaction might be outside the scope of Indian GST.

What has changed

The Authority clarified that the location of the goods does not override the fact that the contract is between two Indian entities. This means businesses must register for GST and pay tax on these transactions, regardless of where the goods are physically shipped.

Who this affects

Indian trading companies that source goods from abroad and sell them to other Indian businesses without importing the goods into India.

An example

Imagine a Mumbai-based trader buys machinery from a German factory and sells it to a construction firm in Dubai. The machinery is shipped directly from Germany to Dubai. Based on this ruling, the Mumbai trader must register for GST and treat the sale to the Dubai-based firm as a taxable supply because the contract is between two Indian entities.

What you should do

If your business model matches this, you should consult a tax professional to ensure you are registered and paying the correct tax. Remember that an advance ruling only binds the company that asked the question and its specific tax officer; it is not a general law that applies to your business automatically.

If you do nothing

If you assume this ruling does not apply to you and fail to register, you risk penalties for non-compliance. A tax officer may view your unregistered sales as a violation of the CGST Act. You could be forced to pay back-taxes, interest, and significant fines.

The terms explained

Advance Ruling
A formal decision provided by tax authorities to a specific business regarding how GST applies to their particular transaction.
Taxable Territory
The geographical area of India where the GST law is in force and applicable.
Supply
Any form of sale, transfer, or exchange of goods or services made for a price in the course of business.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. Snag & Bag Retail Private Limited

Advance Ruling No.56/AAR/2025, dated 21.11.2025 · Tamil Nadu

Questions before the authority

  • Kindly classify the above mentioned as goods or services along with HSN/SAC code with rate of GST?
  • Kindly clarify under which category our business will fall on the above mentioned list and what are the documents should be maintained by us for the transactions depend upon the specified category?
  • Kindly clarify the time and value of supply of goods and services or both based on our business transactions?
  • In above scenario, Please clarify whether we can get the refund amount from ITC credit availed?
  • Kindly Check and advice whether we are on the correct path or we need to raise invoice under export / Nil rated / Exempted / Zero Rate or any other? If it is falls under the category of Export/Nil rated/Exempted/Zero rated sales/services, then whether we can get the refund of tax which is paid for previous months under B2B category.
  • In case, the above transaction is under negative list of GST Act means, are we required to register under GST Law?

Facts

The applicant is an Indian company that sources goods from vendors in Spain/USA and sells them to another Indian entity (Party B). The goods are delivered directly from the foreign vendor to the customer's location abroad, without entering India. The applicant seeks clarity on the GST implications of this business model, specifically regarding classification, registration, and taxability.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Classification and rateCould not be done
Specific details of goods and services were not furnished
Business categoryLiable for rejection
Not covered under Section 97(2)
Time and value of supplyCould not be classified
To be determined by applicant per Sections 12, 13, and 15
Refund of ITCLiable for rejection
Not covered under Section 97(2)
Invoice type and refund eligibilityLiable for rejection
Not covered under Section 97(2)
Registration requirementRegistration is required
Supply is between two units in the taxable territory

The Authority ruled that it could not classify the goods or services due to a lack of specific details provided by the applicant. It further held that most of the questions raised were not covered under the scope of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act and were thus liable for rejection. Regarding registration, the Authority determined that since the supply occurs between two units within the taxable territory, the transaction is subject to GST and registration is required.

Reasoning

The Authority observed that the applicant failed to provide specific descriptions of the goods or services, making classification impossible. It noted that most questions did not fall under the permissible scope of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act. Regarding registration, it relied on Schedule II 1(a) of the CGST Act, concluding that because the supply involves two persons in the taxable territory, it constitutes a taxable supply of goods, necessitating registration and payment of tax.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 12 of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 13 of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Schedule II 1(a) of the CGST Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This ruling highlights the **strict requirement for specific details** when seeking an advance ruling on classification. It serves as a warning that the Authority will reject questions that fall outside the scope of Section 97(2). Practitioners should note that the Authority viewed the transaction between two Indian entities as a **taxable supply within the taxable territory**, regardless of the physical movement of goods outside India.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/12-ms-snag-bag.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 14-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An advance ruling is only legally binding on the company that requested it and the tax authorities dealing with that specific company.

Can I use this ruling to justify my tax position to my local officer?

You can use it as a reference to show how the Authority thinks, but your local tax officer is not legally required to follow it for your business.

Why did the Authority reject most of the questions?

The Authority rejected them because the company did not provide enough specific details about the goods, and many questions fell outside the legal scope of what an advance ruling can address.

Does the physical location of the goods matter for GST?

In this case, the Authority decided that the location of the goods was less important than the fact that the transaction was between two Indian entities.