GST Advance Ruling KAR.ADRG 44/2026 Rejected Due to Unpaid Fees
The Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling rejected an application regarding Goods Transport Agency service valuation because the mandatory filing fee was not paid.
- Ruling
- Order No. KAR.ADRG 44/2026 dated 08.09.2026
- Dated
- 08 Sep 2026
- Authority
- Authority for Advance Ruling
This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.
The short version
- M/s Revathi Enterprises asked if free diesel counts toward service value.
- The Authority did not answer the question on its merits.
- The application was rejected for failing to pay the required ₹5,000 fee.
- Compliance with fee rules is a mandatory condition for any ruling.
In short
The company asked the Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) whether diesel provided for free by a client should be added to the value of their transport services for GST purposes. However, the Authority could not answer this question because the company failed to pay the required application fee of ₹5,000 despite being given multiple chances to do so.
What has changed
How it worked before
Businesses generally assumed that filing an application for an advance ruling would lead to a substantive decision on their tax query.
What has changed
The Authority clarified that paying the full application fee is a mandatory requirement. Because the fee was not paid, the application was rejected without any discussion of the tax issue, meaning no guidance was provided on how to value free-of-cost diesel in transport contracts.
Who this affects
Any business owner or Goods Transport Agency (GTA) planning to file an application for an advance ruling with the GST department.
An example
Imagine a logistics firm in Karnataka wants to know if the cost of tires provided by their client should be included in their taxable service value. They must pay the ₹5,000 fee when submitting their application to the Authority. If they fail to pay this fee, the Authority will reject their request without ever looking at the tax question, leaving the firm with no answer.
What you should do
Ensure all administrative requirements, including the payment of the prescribed fee, are met before filing. Remember that an advance ruling is only binding on the specific business that requested it and its own tax officer; it does not automatically apply to your business or change the law for others.
If you do nothing
If you assume a ruling applies to you when it does not, you risk underpaying your GST or miscalculating your tax liability. A tax officer may disagree with your interpretation, leading to penalties, interest charges, and time-consuming disputes. Always consult with a professional to understand how tax rules apply to your specific situation.
The terms explained
- Goods Transport Agency (GTA)
- Any person or business that provides services in relation to the transport of goods by road and issues a consignment note.
- Advance Ruling
- A written decision provided by the tax authorities to a business to clarify how GST laws apply to a specific transaction.
- Condition Precedent
- A requirement that must be met before a legal process or contract can proceed.
The ruling in detail
Authority for Advance Ruling
M/s Revathi Enterprises (Prop. Rama Naik Harjayanaik Dileep Kumar)
Order No. KAR.ADRG 44/2026 dated 08.09.2026 · Karnataka
Questions before the authority
- Whether diesel filled free of cost by the service recipient in the engaged chartered (dedicated) vehicles, would form part of value of supply of service charged by the applicant and whether GST would be leviable on value of diesel filled free of cost by the service recipient or otherwise under GTA service?
Facts
The applicant is a Goods Transport Agency (GTA) that enters into transportation contracts with various companies. Under these contracts, the service recipients procure and supply High Speed Diesel (HSD) for the chartered vehicles at their own cost. The applicant sought a ruling on whether the value of this free-of-cost diesel should be included in the value of the GTA service for GST purposes.
Ruling
| Question | What the authority ruled |
|---|---|
| Inclusion of free-of-cost diesel in value of supply | Not answered Application rejected as not maintainable due to non-payment of mandatory fees |
The Authority did not address the merits of the question raised by the applicant. Instead, it rejected the application as not maintainable due to the applicant's failure to pay the mandatory application fee in full. Consequently, the Authority stated it was precluded from examining the questions on their merits.
Reasoning
The Authority observed that under Section 97(1) of the CGST/KGST Act, 2017, read with Rule 104 of the CGST/KGST Rules, 2017, an application for Advance Ruling must be accompanied by a prescribed fee of ₹5,000. Despite multiple opportunities and communications provided to the applicant to rectify the deficiency in fee payment, the applicant failed to comply. Therefore, the Authority concluded that the **mandatory requirement** for entertaining the application was not met, rendering the application **liable to be rejected**.
Provisions relied on
- Section 97(1) of the CGST Act, 2017
- Section 97(1) of the KGST Act, 2017
- Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017
- Rule 104 of the KGST Rules, 2017
For the practitioner
This order serves as a procedural reminder that compliance with statutory fee requirements is a **condition precedent** for the admission of an application for Advance Ruling. It does not provide any guidance on the valuation of services involving free-of-cost supplies by recipients. Practitioners should ensure all administrative and financial prerequisites are strictly met to avoid summary rejection of their applications.
Source
This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.
Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/2-revathi_enterprises_prop._rama_naik_harjayanaik_dillep_kumar.pdf
Legibility of the scan, as read: high.
Prepared 21-10-2026.
About Patron Accounting LLP
Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.
Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.
We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:
- Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
- Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
- Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
- Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
- Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009
If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.