GST Advance Ruling Admissibility and Pending Court Cases
The Authority for Advance Ruling cannot decide on tax questions that are already being challenged in court.
- Ruling
- ORDER NO.11/ODISHA-AAR/2025-26, dated 18.03.2026
- Dated
- 18 Mar 2026
- Authority
- Authority for Advance Ruling
This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.
The short version
- The company asked if their manpower services to government bodies were GST-exempt.
- The Authority for Advance Ruling rejected the application.
- The same issue is already pending before the Orissa High Court.
- Section 98(2) of the CGST Act bars rulings on active legal disputes.
In short
Reliable Security and Intelligence Services asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) if their manpower services to government offices qualify for a GST exemption. The AAR refused to answer because the company is already fighting the same tax issue in the Orissa High Court.
What has changed
How it worked before
Businesses often assumed they could seek a second opinion from the AAR even if they were already disputing a tax demand in court.
What has changed
The Authority confirmed it will not hear cases that are already sub-judice. This means if you have an active court case or a pending legal proceeding on a specific tax question, the AAR will reject your application without looking at the merits of your tax claim.
Who this affects
Businesses that have active tax disputes or ongoing court cases regarding their GST liability.
An example
Imagine a cleaning company, 'CleanCorp', is currently in court arguing that their services to a government school are exempt from GST. If CleanCorp then asks the AAR for a ruling on the exact same service, the AAR will reject the request. The AAR will not provide an answer because the court is already deciding the matter.
What you should do
Check if your tax question is already part of an ongoing legal proceeding or court case before applying for a ruling. Remember that an advance ruling only binds the specific business that asked and its own tax officer; it is not a general law for all businesses.
If you do nothing
If you apply for a ruling while a case is already pending, you will waste time and administrative fees. The Authority will simply dismiss your application under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act. You will still be required to resolve the matter through the existing court or appellate process.
The terms explained
- Advance Ruling
- A written decision by tax authorities on how GST applies to a specific business transaction.
- Sub-judice
- A legal term meaning a matter is currently under consideration by a court or judge.
- Admissible
- Whether an application meets the legal requirements to be accepted and reviewed by the authority.
The ruling in detail
Authority for Advance Ruling
M/s Reliable Security and Intelligence Services (Odisha) Private Limited
ORDER NO.11/ODISHA-AAR/2025-26, dated 18.03.2026 · Odisha
Questions before the authority
- Whether supply of manpower service to both Government Polytechnic, Bhubaneswar and RWSS Division, Office/ Sub-Division Office across Odisha under Addl. Secretary to Government & Administrative Officers, OWSM are exempted from GST as per Sl. No. 03 of Notification No. 12/2017 -CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
Facts
The applicant is a supplier of manpower services to various government organizations, including Government Polytechnic, Bhubaneswar and the RWSS Division. The applicant sought an advance ruling on whether these services are exempt from GST under Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate).
Ruling
| Question | What the authority ruled |
|---|---|
| Exemption of manpower supply services | Not admitted The question is already pending in appellate proceedings before the Hon'ble High Court of Orissa. |
The Authority held that the application is not admissible. It concluded that the issue raised is already pending before the Hon'ble High Court of Orissa in proceedings involving the applicant.
Reasoning
The Authority examined the admissibility of the application under Section 98(2) of the CGST/OGST Act, 2017. It observed that the same issue was previously adjudicated by the proper officer in an Order-in-Original, which the applicant has challenged before the Hon'ble High Court of Orissa. Consequently, the statutory bar under Section 98(2) prohibits the Authority from admitting an application where the same question is already pending or decided in any proceedings involving the applicant.
Provisions relied on
- Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017
- Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017
- Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017
- Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017
For the practitioner
This ruling serves as a procedural reminder that the **Authority for Advance Ruling will not entertain applications** where the subject matter is already sub-judice in other legal proceedings. Practitioners should ensure that no parallel litigation exists regarding the specific issue before filing for an advance ruling. It does not provide any substantive interpretation on the taxability of the services in question.
Source
This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.
Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/reliable_securtiy_ruling_0001.pdf
Legibility of the scan, as read: high.
Prepared 12-10-2026.
About Patron Accounting LLP
Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.
Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.
We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:
- Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
- Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
- Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
- Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
- Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009
If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.