Gujarat AAR Ruling on High Sea Sales and GST Jurisdiction
The Authority for Advance Ruling rejected a request to clarify GST on High Sea Sales, citing a lack of legal jurisdiction.
- Ruling
- GUJ/GAAR/ADM//2017-18/1 dated 30.10.2017
- Dated
- 30 Oct 2017
- Authority
- Authority for Advance Ruling
This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.
The short version
- The company asked if High Sea Sales attract GST.
- The Authority rejected the application without deciding the tax issue.
- The Authority ruled it cannot decide on 'place of supply' questions.
- The ruling confirms the Authority only handles specific GST matters.
In short
The company asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Gujarat to decide if selling imported goods while they are still at sea or in a bonded warehouse counts as a taxable supply under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) law. The Authority refused to answer, stating that these questions involve customs laws and the 'place of supply,' which are outside its legal power to decide.
What has changed
How it worked before
Businesses were uncertain whether High Sea Sales and Bond Transfer Sales were subject to GST, as the law was new and specific guidance was lacking.
What has changed
The Authority clarified that it will not accept applications that ask for a determination of the 'place of supply' or matters governed by Customs law. This means businesses cannot use the AAR process to get clarity on these specific types of import-related transactions.
Who this affects
Importers and traders who engage in High Sea Sales or transfer goods while they are held in customs-bonded warehouses.
An example
A trading company imports chemicals and sells them to a buyer while the goods are still on the high seas. They want to know if they must pay GST on this sale. Based on this ruling, if they ask the AAR for a decision, the Authority will likely reject the application because it involves customs-related 'place of supply' issues.
What you should do
This ruling only applies to the company that asked the question. If you have a similar doubt, do not assume this ruling provides an answer for your business. You should consult a tax professional to review your specific transaction structure, as the AAR will not provide a ruling on this topic.
If you do nothing
If you assume this ruling means your transactions are exempt or taxable, you risk taking the wrong position on your tax filings. A tax officer may disagree with your interpretation, leading to audits, penalties, and interest charges. Always seek professional advice tailored to your specific business facts.
The terms explained
- High Sea Sales
- A sale where the title of goods is transferred from the original importer to another buyer while the goods are still in transit on the high seas.
- Bonded Warehouse
- A secure area where imported goods can be stored without paying customs duty until they are cleared for home consumption.
- Place of Supply
- The location where a transaction is considered to have taken place for tax purposes, which determines whether GST is applicable.
The ruling in detail
Authority for Advance Ruling
M/s. Pon Pure Chemical India Private Limited
GUJ/GAAR/ADM//2017-18/1 dated 30.10.2017 · Gujarat
Questions before the authority
- Whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of that term.
Facts
The applicant sought an advance ruling regarding the taxability of High Sea Sales and Bond Transfer Sales transactions. The applicant questioned whether these transactions, where goods are sold before or after entering the Customs Area but before clearance, attract Goods and Services Tax. The authority examined whether these transactions constitute a supply under the GST framework.
Ruling
| Question | What the authority ruled |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction to rule on High Sea Sales and Bond Transfer Sales | Rejected The authority lacks jurisdiction as the issue relates to place of supply and Customs domain. |
The authority rejected the application at the admission stage without addressing the merits of the case. It held that the questions raised pertain to the determination of the 'place of supply' and fall within the domain of Customs law rather than the Goods and Services Tax domain. Consequently, the authority concluded it lacked the jurisdiction to decide these issues.
Reasoning
The authority reasoned that the questions raised are fundamentally related to the determination of the 'place of supply', which is not an issue enumerated under Section 97(2) of the CGST/GGST Act, 2017. Furthermore, it observed that the transactions involve imported goods subject to Customs duty, placing them within the Customs domain rather than the GST domain. The authority relied on Section 97(2) and Section 98(2) of the CGST/GGST Act, 2017, as well as the proviso to Section 5(1) of the IGST Act, 2017, to conclude that it was **lacking jurisdiction** to entertain the application.
Provisions relied on
- Section 97(2) of the CGST/GGST Act, 2017
- Section 98(2) of the CGST/GGST Act, 2017
- Section 5(1) of the IGST Act, 2017
- Section 2(10) of the IGST Act, 2017
- Section 7 of the IGST Act, 2017
- Section 3(7) of the IGST Act, 2017
- Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975
- Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962
For the practitioner
This ruling serves as a precedent that the Authority for Advance Ruling will **reject applications** that primarily seek to determine the 'place of supply' or issues falling under the Customs domain. It clarifies that the AAR is strictly limited to the specific issues enumerated in Section 97(2). Practitioners should note that this order does not provide a substantive decision on the taxability of High Sea Sales, but rather acts as a **jurisdictional bar** to such inquiries.
Source
This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.
Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/guj-2017-18-1_dt_30-10-17_pon_pure_0.pdf
Legibility of the scan, as read: high.
Prepared 13-10-2026.
About Patron Accounting LLP
Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.
Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.
We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:
- Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
- Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
- Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
- Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
- Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009
If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.