Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Gujarat

GST on Compensation for Transit Losses: Gujarat Advance Ruling

Compensation received from transporters for transit losses is not a taxable supply of services under GST.

Ruling
GUJ/GAAR/R/2026/23 dated 24.06.2026
Dated
24 Jun 2026
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. The company asked if transit loss compensation is a taxable service.
  2. The Authority ruled that such payments are not taxable under GST.
  3. These payments are considered liquidated damages, not a supply of services.

In short

The company asked the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR) if money received from transporters for chemical losses during transit counts as a taxable service under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act. The authority decided that this compensation is simply a recovery for damages caused by a breach of contract, not a payment for a service provided by the company.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses were often unsure if receiving compensation for damages could be classified as 'tolerating an act,' which would make it a taxable service under GST.

What has changed

The authority clarified that these payments are a 'mere flow of money' to cover losses. In practice, this means you do not need to pay GST on compensation received from transporters for goods lost or damaged during transit.

Who this affects

Businesses that hire transporters and receive compensation for goods lost or damaged in transit.

An example

A logistics firm loses a shipment of electronics belonging to a retailer. The retailer charges the logistics firm for the value of the lost goods as per their contract. Under this ruling, the retailer does not need to pay GST on this compensation because it is a recovery of loss, not a service provided to the logistics firm.

What you should do

If you receive similar compensation, you may treat it as non-taxable. However, remember that an Advance Ruling only binds the company that asked and its specific tax office; it is not a law that automatically applies to your business.

If you do nothing

If you incorrectly assume this ruling applies to your specific contract, you might fail to pay GST on payments that the tax department considers taxable services. This could lead to tax demands, interest, and penalties if an officer disagrees with your classification during an audit.

The terms explained

Liquidated damages
A pre-agreed amount of money paid by one party to another when a contract is broken, intended to cover the loss suffered.
Supply of services
Any activity carried out by one person for another for a fee, which is generally subject to GST.
Consideration
The payment or value given in exchange for a service or good.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. Pon Pure Chemical India Private Limited

GUJ/GAAR/R/2026/23 dated 24.06.2026 · Gujarat

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the amount from the transporters as a compensation for loss would be considered as a "Supply of services" by the applicant as per para 5(e) of Schedule II of Section 7 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017?

Facts

The applicant engages various transporters for the movement of chemicals. Due to the nature of the goods, unavoidable losses occur during transit, and the applicant seeks compensation from transporters for losses exceeding an agreed tolerance limit.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Whether compensation for loss from transporters is a supply of servicesNo
The compensation is not a consideration for any supply

The Authority held that the compensation received from transporters for losses in transit does not constitute a supply of services. Such payments are in the nature of liquidated damages for breach of contract and are not taxable.

Reasoning

The Authority relied on the principle that liquidated damages are a **mere flow of money** to compensate for loss or damage and do not constitute consideration for an independent service. It determined that the applicant is not tolerating an act or refraining from an act under the contract, but is merely recovering damages for breach. The ruling is based on the interpretation of Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017, and the clarification provided in CBIC Circular No. 178/10/2022-GST.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 2(31) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 73 of the Contract Act, 1872
  • Para 5(e) of Schedule II of the CGST Act, 2017
  • CBIC Circular No. 178/10/2022-GST dated 03.08.2022
  • CBIC Circular No. 245/02/2025-GST dated 28.01.2025

For the practitioner

This ruling confirms that compensation received as liquidated damages for breach of contract, specifically for transit losses, is **not taxable under GST**. It provides strong support for taxpayers seeking to avoid GST on recovery of damages, provided the payment is purely compensatory and not for an independent service. It does not apply to payments that might be construed as consideration for a separate service or facility.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/2-ponpure.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 11-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An Advance Ruling is only legally binding on the company that requested it and the tax authorities dealing with that specific case.

Does this mean I never pay GST on damages?

Not necessarily. This ruling only applies to compensation for transit losses. If a payment is actually for a separate service or facility, it may still be taxable.

What if my local tax officer disagrees with this ruling?

Since this ruling is not a law, your tax officer is not required to follow it. They may still issue a notice if they believe your specific transaction is taxable.