GST Advance Ruling on Input Tax Credit Time Limits
The Authority for Advance Ruling cannot extend statutory deadlines for claiming input tax credit.
- Ruling
- Order No. KAR.ADRG 26/2026 dated 19.05.2026
- Dated
- 19 May 2026
- Authority
- Authority for Advance Ruling
This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.
The short version
- Pigeon Education Technology asked to extend the input tax credit deadline.
- The request was due to bank account seizures preventing tax payments.
- The Authority rejected the application as it lacks jurisdiction for such relief.
- The applicant formally withdrew the request during the proceedings.
In short
Pigeon Education Technology India Pvt. asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) to extend the deadline for claiming input tax credit (ITC) because their bank accounts were seized. They argued that this seizure prevented them from paying the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on time, which in turn blocked their ability to claim the credit. The AAR ruled that it does not have the power to grant extensions for statutory deadlines or address issues related to bank account seizures.
What has changed
How it worked before
Businesses often hoped that the AAR could provide procedural relief or extensions when external circumstances, like bank seizures, made it impossible to meet tax filing deadlines.
What has changed
The AAR confirmed it cannot change legal deadlines or provide relief for operational difficulties. This means businesses must follow the strict timelines set by the GST law regardless of their financial or legal situation.
Who this affects
Businesses facing operational hurdles or bank account seizures that prevent them from paying taxes or claiming input tax credit on time.
An example
Imagine a software firm whose bank accounts are frozen by a government agency, preventing them from paying their monthly GST. They might wonder if they can ask the AAR to extend their ITC claim deadline. Based on this ruling, the AAR would reject the request because they cannot override statutory time limits. The firm would need to seek relief through the High Court or other relevant legal forums instead.
What you should do
If you face a similar situation, do not approach the AAR for a deadline extension as they lack the authority to grant it. This ruling is specific to the applicant and does not set a precedent for your business. You should consult a tax professional to explore appropriate legal channels for addressing your specific grievance.
If you do nothing
Assuming this ruling allows you to bypass deadlines will lead to the loss of your input tax credit. Tax officers will strictly enforce the statutory dates regardless of your internal business problems. Attempting to use the AAR for matters outside its jurisdiction wastes time and resources while your tax liabilities remain unpaid.
The terms explained
- Input Tax Credit
- The tax a business pays on its purchases that it can use to reduce the tax it owes on its own sales.
- Authority for Advance Ruling
- A government body that provides official clarifications on how GST laws apply to a specific business's proposed or ongoing transactions.
- Integrated Goods and Services Tax
- The tax collected on the supply of goods or services between different states or involving foreign entities.
The ruling in detail
Authority for Advance Ruling
M/s Pigeon Education Technology India Pvt. Ltd.
Order No. KAR.ADRG 26/2026 dated 19.05.2026 · Karnataka
Questions before the authority
- The applicant sought an extension of the time limit for availing input tax credit beyond the statutory due date due to the seizure of its bank accounts by authorities.
Facts
The applicant is engaged in providing online education services and procures advertisement services from foreign entities like Facebook and Google. Due to the seizure of its bank accounts by authorities, the applicant was unable to pay the IGST liability within the prescribed time limit, which prevented it from availing the corresponding input tax credit. The applicant approached the Authority for Advance Ruling seeking an extension of the time limit for availing this credit.
Ruling
The Authority held that the application is not admissible and is rejected. Furthermore, the applicant informed the Authority of its intention to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application for advance ruling is disposed of as withdrawn.
Reasoning
The Authority observed that the issue raised by the applicant falls outside the ambit of the Authority for Advance Ruling under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017. It was noted that the applicant mis-declared that the question was not pending in any proceedings. Additionally, the applicant formally requested to withdraw the application on the grounds that the issue does not fall within the jurisdiction of the Authority.
Provisions relied on
- Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017
- Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017
For the practitioner
This order confirms that the Authority for Advance Ruling lacks the jurisdiction to grant extensions for availing input tax credit or to address grievances related to the seizure of bank accounts. It serves as a reminder that procedural relief regarding statutory time limits must be sought through appropriate legal channels rather than the AAR. The ruling does not provide any substantive interpretation of GST provisions regarding input tax credit eligibility.
Source
This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.
Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/1-pigeon_education_technology.pdf
Legibility of the scan, as read: high.
Prepared 11-10-2026.
About Patron Accounting LLP
Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.
Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.
We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:
- Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
- Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
- Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
- Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
- Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009
If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.