Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu GST Advance Ruling TN/25/ARA/2026 Rejected for Procedural Errors

The Authority for Advance Ruling rejected an application because the business failed to submit the required manual paperwork.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No.25/ARA/2026, dated 09.03.2026
Dated
09 Mar 2026
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. The company asked for a GST advance ruling on tax matters.
  2. The applicant failed to file the mandatory manual application in quadruplicate.
  3. The Authority rejected the request due to these procedural failures.

In short

The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Tamil Nadu dismissed a request for a GST ruling because the business did not follow the necessary filing steps. While the company applied online, they ignored the rule requiring a physical, manual submission in quadruplicate.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often assume that submitting an application online is sufficient to start the advance ruling process.

What has changed

The authority confirmed that online filing is not enough; you must also complete the manual filing process under Rule 107A. If you ignore these procedural steps, your request will be rejected without the authority ever looking at your actual tax question.

Who this affects

Any business owner or tax professional planning to file for a GST advance ruling in India.

An example

Imagine a software company in Chennai wants to know if their service qualifies for a lower GST rate. They submit their request online but fail to send the physical copies to the AAR office. The authority will reject their case for being incomplete, meaning the company gets no answer on their tax rate question.

What you should do

Ensure you follow both online and manual filing requirements exactly as stated in the GST rules. Remember that this ruling only applies to the specific business that asked; it is not a general law that changes how the tax department treats your own applications.

If you do nothing

If you ignore procedural rules, your application will be dismissed, and you will lose the time and fees invested in the process. You will remain without a clear answer on your tax issue, leaving you vulnerable to disputes with your local tax officer later. A tax officer is not bound by a rejected application and may take a different view during an audit.

The terms explained

Advance Ruling
A formal decision from the tax authority that clarifies how GST laws apply to a specific business transaction.
Procedural Compliance
Following the specific steps and rules required to file a document or request with a government office.
Quadruplicate
Providing four identical copies of a document.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. Peritus Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Advance Ruling No.25/ARA/2026, dated 09.03.2026 · Tamil Nadu

Facts

The applicant filed an online application for an advance ruling under Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017. However, the applicant failed to file the required manual application in quadruplicate as mandated by Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017. Despite multiple notices sent via registered post and email, the applicant did not respond or comply with the procedural requirements.

Ruling

The Authority for Advance Ruling rejected the application due to the applicant's failure to comply with the mandatory procedural requirement of filing a manual application as prescribed under Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017. The ruling does not address any substantive tax issues as the application was dismissed on procedural grounds.

Reasoning

The Authority noted that the applicant failed to file the manual application in quadruplicate along with the necessary proof of payment of fees as required by Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017. Multiple notices issued to the applicant were returned by the postal authorities with remarks indicating the applicant could not be located at the provided address. Consequently, the Authority determined that the application was liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, due to the lack of response and failure to follow mandatory filing procedures.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Rule 107A of the CGST Rules, 2017

For the practitioner

This order serves as a reminder that **procedural compliance** is a prerequisite for the admission of an advance ruling application. Practitioners should ensure that all manual filing requirements, such as those under Rule 107A, are strictly met alongside online submissions. This ruling does not provide any guidance on substantive tax matters.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/10-peritus_solutions_aar_order.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 12-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I cannot apply for an advance ruling online?

No, you can still apply online, but you must also complete the mandatory manual filing steps required by the rules.

Is this decision binding on my business?

No, an advance ruling is only binding on the business that requested it and their specific tax officer.

What happens if I only file online?

Your application will likely be rejected for failing to meet the mandatory procedural requirements.

Can I get a refund of my fees if my application is rejected for procedural reasons?

The ruling does not address fee refunds, but generally, fees paid for an incomplete application are not returned.