Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Tamil Nadu

GST Advance Ruling Rejected Due to Pending Tax Proceedings

The Authority for Advance Ruling rejected an application because the business already had active tax scrutiny proceedings on the same issue.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No. 7/ARA/2026, Dated 22.01.2026
Dated
22 Jan 2026
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Murali Pharmacy asked about GST threshold exemptions for small businesses.
  2. The Authority for Advance Ruling rejected the request entirely.
  3. The law forbids rulings on issues already under active tax assessment.
  4. No decision was made on the actual GST exemption rules.

In short

Murali Pharmacy asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) if they qualified for a GST exemption for businesses with turnover under 40 lakhs. The AAR refused to answer because the pharmacy was already facing tax scrutiny and assessment for the same period. Under the law, the AAR cannot provide a ruling if the tax department is already investigating the specific question.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often assumed they could seek a formal ruling to clarify their tax position even if the tax department had raised questions about their filings.

What has changed

The ruling confirms that if your tax officer has already started an assessment or sent a notice about a specific issue, you cannot bypass that process by asking the AAR for a different opinion. This means the AAR will reject your application immediately without looking at the merits of your tax question.

Who this affects

Any business owner currently facing a tax audit, scrutiny, or assessment notice from the GST department.

An example

Imagine a grocery store owner who receives a notice from their tax officer questioning their GST registration status. If the owner then applies for an advance ruling to ask if they should have been registered, the AAR will reject the application. The owner must instead respond to the tax officer's notice and follow the regular assessment path.

What you should do

If you are already under audit or scrutiny, you must resolve the issue through the standard assessment process rather than seeking an advance ruling. Remember that an advance ruling only binds the specific business that asked and its own tax officer; it is not a general law that applies to everyone.

If you do nothing

If you ignore active proceedings to seek an advance ruling, you will waste time and money on an application that will be rejected. You will still be required to face the original tax officer, and the delay may lead to additional interest or penalties on unpaid taxes. The tax officer is not required to wait for an AAR decision that is procedurally barred.

The terms explained

Advance Ruling
A formal decision provided by tax authorities to a business to clarify how GST laws apply to their specific transactions.
Scrutiny
A process where tax officials examine your filed returns to check for errors or discrepancies.
Adjudication
The formal process of deciding a tax dispute, usually resulting in an order that determines how much tax is owed.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. MURALI PHARMACY

Advance Ruling No. 7/ARA/2026, Dated 22.01.2026 · Tamil Nadu

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the applicant is liable to pay tax for turnover less than the threshold limit of Rs. 40 Lakhs as per the Notification No. 10/2019-CT dated 07-03-2019?
  • Whether the provisions of exemption as per Notification No. 10/2019-CT dated 07-03-2019 is applicable only to new registrants or applicable to existing registrants under GST, before 01-04-2019?

Facts

The applicant is a proprietorship concern registered under GST, engaged in the retail sale of medicines and medical equipment. The applicant sought an advance ruling on whether they are liable to pay tax on turnover below the threshold of Rs. 40 Lakhs, relying on Notification No. 10/2019-CT. However, the tax authorities had already initiated scrutiny and assessment proceedings against the applicant for the period 2019-20 to 2021-22 prior to the filing of this application.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Liability to pay tax for turnover below Rs. 40 LakhsRejected
Application rejected as the matter is already pending in proceedings
Applicability of exemption to existing registrantsRejected
Application rejected as the matter is already pending in proceedings

The Authority for Advance Ruling rejected the application in its entirety. It held that the application is not admissible because the questions raised are already pending or decided in proceedings under the Act. Consequently, the merits of the questions regarding the threshold exemption were not addressed.

Reasoning

The Authority relied on the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, which mandates that the Authority shall not admit an application where the question raised is already pending or decided in any proceedings. The records confirmed that scrutiny and assessment proceedings, including the issuance of Form GST ASMT-10 and subsequent adjudication orders in Form GST DRC-07, were initiated against the applicant before the filing of the advance ruling application. Therefore, the Authority concluded that it lacked the jurisdiction to entertain the application on merits.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Notification No. 10/2019-CT dated 07-03-2019
  • Rule 107A of the CGST Rules
  • Circular No. 25/25/2017-GST

For the practitioner

This ruling serves as a **procedural bar** for practitioners, emphasizing that an application for advance ruling will be rejected if the subject matter is already under scrutiny or assessment by tax authorities. It does not provide any substantive interpretation on the applicability of the Rs. 40 Lakhs threshold exemption for existing registrants. Practitioners should ensure that no active proceedings exist regarding the specific issue before filing for an advance ruling.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/7-murali_pharmacy_aar_order_compressed.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 12-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Can I use this ruling to prove I am exempt from GST?

No. This ruling did not decide whether the exemption applies; it only decided that the AAR could not hear the case because of existing tax proceedings.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An advance ruling only applies to the business that requested it and its specific tax officer. It does not change the law for other businesses.

What if my tax officer disagrees with my interpretation?

You must follow the formal assessment and appeal process. You cannot use an advance ruling to override an active investigation.

Why was the application rejected?

The law states that the AAR cannot admit an application if the issue is already being handled in other tax proceedings, such as an audit or assessment.