Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Maharashtra

Maharashtra GST Advance Ruling Withdrawal: Marvell Nutex Pvt Ltd

The Authority for Advance Ruling in Maharashtra closed the case for Marvell Nutex Pvt Ltd because the company withdrew its request.

Ruling
NO.GST-ARA-30/2025-26/B-106, Mumbai, dt. 02/06/2026
Dated
02 Jun 2026
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. The company asked about GST on selling leasehold land and buildings.
  2. The company also asked if buyers could claim input tax credit.
  3. The applicant voluntarily withdrew the request before a decision was made.
  4. The authority did not rule on the taxability of these transactions.

In short

Marvell Nutex Pvt Ltd asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Maharashtra for clarity on GST regarding the sale of leasehold land and buildings. Before the authority could decide, the company chose to withdraw its application. Because the request was pulled, the authority did not provide any guidance or legal opinion on the matter.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often look to advance rulings to understand if selling industrial leasehold property attracts GST and if the buyer can claim input tax credit.

What has changed

Nothing changed. The authority did not issue a decision, meaning there is no new guidance or precedent created by this order.

Who this affects

Businesses involved in the sale or transfer of industrial leasehold land and buildings.

An example

Imagine a manufacturing firm planning to sell its factory plot held on a long-term lease. They might wonder if they need to charge GST to the buyer. This ruling does not help them, as the authority never reached a conclusion on the tax treatment of such sales.

What you should do

Do not rely on this order for tax planning. Since the authority did not answer the questions, this document provides no legal guidance for your own business decisions.

If you do nothing

If you assume this order provides a tax exemption or a specific rule, you risk miscalculating your GST liability. A tax officer is not bound by a withdrawn application and may assess your transaction differently. Relying on an unanswered question can lead to penalties and interest charges.

The terms explained

Advance Ruling
A written decision by tax authorities on how GST applies to a specific business transaction.
Input Tax Credit
The tax a business pays on its purchases that it can use to reduce the tax it owes on its own sales.
Leasehold land
Land held by a business under a long-term rental agreement rather than through outright ownership.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. Marvell Nutex pvt ltd

NO.GST-ARA-30/2025-26/B-106, Mumbai, dt. 02/06/2026 · Maharashtra

Questions before the authority

  • Whether activity relating to Sale/Transfer of leasehold land & Building and also to obtain permission for such sale would be taxable?
  • Whether GST is applicable on the consideration paid by transferee (buyer) to transfer or against Land & Building and if yes, whether ITC will be eligible to buyer (transferee) which can be used against the supply of their goods and services?

Facts

The applicant sought an advance ruling regarding the taxability of the sale or transfer of an industrial plot and building originally allotted by MIDC under a 99-year lease deed. The applicant intended to determine if the transfer of such leasehold rights and the associated permission fees attract GST, and whether the transferee would be eligible for Input Tax Credit.

Ruling

The authority did not provide a ruling on the merits of the questions presented. The applicant voluntarily and unconditionally requested to withdraw the application before the authority could issue a decision. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Reasoning

The applicant submitted an email dated 20.05.2026 expressing their intention to withdraw the application and not seek further clarification on the questions raised. Under the provisions of the CGST Act and MGST Act, the authority allowed the request for withdrawal. Therefore, the authority did not proceed to examine the merits or detailed facts of the case.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
  • Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
  • Section 98 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This order serves as a procedural record of a **voluntary withdrawal** of an application for advance ruling. It provides no legal precedent or guidance on the taxability of the transfer of MIDC leasehold land and buildings. Practitioners should note that the substantive tax questions remain **unanswered** by this authority.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/2-gst-ara-marvell-nutex-pvt-ltd_1.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 11-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I do not have to pay GST on leasehold land sales?

No. The authority did not decide on the taxability of these sales, so this order does not change your tax obligations.

Is this decision binding on my business?

No. An advance ruling only binds the specific business that asked the question and its own tax officer. Since this case was withdrawn, it creates no precedent for anyone.

Can I use this order to support my tax filing?

No. Because the application was withdrawn, the authority provided no reasoning or conclusion that you can use to support your tax position.