Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand GST Advance Ruling 03/2017-18 on Excise Duty Exemptions

Ruling
Ruling No 03 /2017-18 dated 19th March 2018
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

In short

The company asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) if they could keep old excise duty exemptions after buying a business. The authority decided they could not answer this question because it did not relate to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often assumed that the AAR could provide guidance on any tax-related uncertainty following a business acquisition. Many owners believed that if a question involved tax benefits, the authority would be able to clarify how those benefits transitioned under the new GST regime.

What has changed

The authority ruled that it only has the power to answer questions specifically listed in the GST law. Because the request concerned old excise duty notifications rather than GST provisions, the authority rejected the application without looking at the merits of the case.

Who this affects

This ruling is relevant for business owners who have acquired a company through a slump sale and are unsure if they can continue claiming legacy tax exemptions from the pre-GST era.

What you should do

You should not assume this ruling sets a precedent for your own tax situation, as an advance ruling only binds the specific company that asked and its local tax office. If you have a question about your tax status, ensure it falls strictly within the list of topics allowed under Section 97(2) of the CGST Act before filing an application.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s Kanj Products Private Limited

Ruling No 03 /2017-18 dated 19th March 2018 · Uttarakhand

Questions before the authority

  • If the assessee takes over an eligible unit as a going concern under slump sale agreement and there is a change in the ownership of the unit which was availing the benefit of area based exemption notification no. 50/2003-CE dated 10.6.2003, as amended, prior to 1.7.2017.
  • If the said eligible unit availing of the exemption is physically shifted to a new location within the area specified in the said area based exemption notifications.
  • If there is any addition or modification in the plant or machinery or on the production of new products after taking over an eligible unit during residual period of exemption.

Facts

The applicant sought an advance ruling regarding the applicability of a DIPP notification dated 5.10.2017 and a CBEC circular dated 27.11.2017. The applicant had acquired an eligible unit as a going concern via a slump sale agreement, which was previously availing area-based excise duty exemptions. They requested clarification on whether these benefits would continue following the change in ownership, relocation of the unit, or modifications to plant and machinery.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Maintainability of applicationNot entertainable
Questions do not fall under the scope of Section 97(2) of the CGST/SGST Act

The Authority for Advance Ruling concluded that the questions raised by the applicant do not fall under the purview of the Authority as defined under the CGST/SGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the request was deemed not entertainable. The authority did not provide a ruling on the merits of the tax benefits requested.

Reasoning

The Authority observed that the clarification requested by the applicant pertains to notifications and circulars not issued under the provisions of the CGST/SGST Act. Furthermore, the issues raised do not fall within the list of subjects specified in sub-clauses (a) to (g) of Section 97(2) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017. As the subject matter is outside the **statutory jurisdiction** of the Authority for Advance Ruling, the request was rejected as **not maintainable**.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 97(1) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017
  • Section 97(2) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017
  • Section 100 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This ruling serves as a procedural reminder that the Authority for Advance Ruling is limited to specific questions defined under Section 97(2) of the GST Act. It clarifies that the Authority will not entertain requests for interpretation of notifications or circulars that do not originate from the GST legislation itself. Practitioners should ensure that their queries strictly align with the **statutory scope** of the Authority before filing.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/uttarakhand_03-2017-18_dt_19-03-18.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 21-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I cannot claim my old excise duty exemptions?

No, this ruling does not say anything about your eligibility for those exemptions. It only states that the AAR is not the correct place to ask about them because they are not part of the GST law.

Is this decision binding on my business in a different state?

No, an advance ruling is not a law that applies to everyone. It is a private decision that only applies to the company that filed the request.

What happens if my local tax officer disagrees with my interpretation of an exemption?

If your tax officer disagrees with you, you should consult with a tax professional to review your specific documents. You cannot use this ruling to force the officer to agree with you, as the authority did not provide a decision on the merits of the case.

How do I know if my question is allowed under the GST Act?

You must check if your question falls under the specific categories listed in Section 97(2) of the CGST Act. If your query is about old excise laws or other non-GST matters, the authority will likely reject it as they did in this case.