Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Gujarat

GST on Liquidated Damages: Gujarat Advance Ruling GUJ/GAAR/R/2025/47

The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling decided that liquidated damages paid for contract breaches are not subject to GST.

Ruling
GUJ/GAAR/R/2025/47 dated 03.11.2025
Dated
03 Nov 2025
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. The company asked if GST applies to liquidated damages paid for contract breaches.
  2. The Authority ruled these payments are not taxable under GST.
  3. Liquidated damages are compensatory, not a payment for a service or supply.

In short

The company asked the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR) if they must pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) on liquidated damages paid to a municipal body for failing to meet contract obligations. The authority decided that these payments are not a supply of services and therefore do not attract GST.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses were often uncertain if penalty payments or liquidated damages for contract breaches should be treated as a 'service' of tolerating a breach, which would make them taxable.

What has changed

The authority clarified that genuine pre-estimated losses paid as damages are simply compensation for injury or loss. Because there is no agreement to 'tolerate' a breach in exchange for money, these payments do not qualify as a taxable supply under GST law.

Who this affects

Businesses that pay or receive liquidated damages for breach of contract or non-performance of obligations.

An example

Imagine a construction firm that pays a penalty to a client because a project was delayed. The firm might wonder if they owe GST on that penalty payment. Based on this ruling, if the payment is purely to compensate for the delay and not for a separate service, it is likely not taxable. The firm should document the contract terms to prove the payment is a genuine pre-estimated loss.

What you should do

This ruling only applies to the specific company that asked the question. If you are in a similar situation, you cannot automatically stop paying GST on such damages; you should consult your tax advisor to see if your specific contract terms match this ruling's logic.

If you do nothing

If you assume this ruling applies to you and stop paying GST on damages, your local tax officer may disagree and issue a demand notice. You would then face the cost of defending your position in legal proceedings, including potential interest and penalties if you are found to be wrong.

The terms explained

Liquidated damages
A pre-determined amount of money specified in a contract that one party pays to the other if they fail to meet their obligations.
Supply
Any form of sale, transfer, or exchange of goods or services made for a price, which is the basis for charging GST.
Input tax credit
The tax a business pays on its own purchases, which it can use to reduce the tax it owes on its own sales.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. JBM Ecolife Mobility Surat Private Ltd.

GUJ/GAAR/R/2025/47 dated 03.11.2025 · Gujarat

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the GST is payable on the liquidated damages paid by the Applicant to SSL for various material defaults, breaches or non-performance of the obligation as per the terms and conditions of the Concession Agreement, under the provisions of GST law?
  • If the answer to above question is in affirmative, what shall be the applicable rate of GST thereupon and the corresponding Service Accounting Code (SAC)?
  • If the answer to question no. 1 is in affirmative, whether the applicant is eligible to avail ITC of the GST so paid to SSL on liquidated damages?

Facts

The applicant is a Special Purpose Vehicle engaged in the procurement, operation, and maintenance of electric buses for the city of Surat under a Concession Agreement with the Surat Municipal Corporation, later transferred to Sitilink Limited (SSL). The agreement includes clauses for liquidated damages payable by the applicant to SSL for material defaults, breaches, or failure to perform obligations. The applicant sought a ruling on whether these payments are subject to GST.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
GST on liquidated damagesNo
For the reasons mentioned in the order
Applicable rate of GST and SACNot required to be answered
In view of the answer to question 1
Eligibility to avail ITCNot required to be answered
In view of the answer to question 1

The Authority ruled that the liquidated damages paid by the applicant to SSL are not subject to GST. Consequently, the remaining questions regarding the applicable rate of GST and the eligibility to avail Input Tax Credit were not required to be answered.

Reasoning

The Authority reasoned that the liquidated damages are a **genuine pre-estimated loss** and not a consideration for any independent activity or for tolerating a breach. Relying on CBIC Circular No. 178/10/2022-GST, it held that such payments are merely a flow of money to compensate for injury or loss and do not constitute a supply. The Authority also noted that there was no agreement, express or implied, to tolerate an act or refrain from doing anything in exchange for these payments.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 7 of the CGST/GGST Act, 2017
  • Section 95(c) of the CGST/GGST Act, 2017
  • Section 97(2) of the CGST/GGST Act, 2017
  • CBIC Circular No. 178/10/2022-GST dated 03.08.2022
  • CBIC Circular No. 245/02/2025-GST dated 28.01.2025

For the practitioner

This ruling confirms that liquidated damages paid for breach of contract are **not taxable** under GST, provided they are compensatory in nature and not consideration for a separate supply. It reinforces the principle that such payments do not constitute 'tolerating an act' under the GST regime. Practitioners can use this to defend against tax demands on penalty or damage payments in similar commercial contracts.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/47_jbm_ecolife_mobility_surat_private_limited_removed_compressed.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 15-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An Advance Ruling is only binding on the business that requested it and the tax authorities for that specific case.

Can I use this ruling to argue against a tax demand?

You can use the reasoning in this ruling to support your case, but it does not automatically exempt your business from tax. You should discuss the specific wording of your contract with a tax professional.

What if my tax officer disagrees with this ruling?

Tax officers are not strictly bound by rulings issued to other businesses. If your officer disagrees, you may need to provide evidence that your contract terms are identical in nature to those in this ruling.

Does this mean all penalties are tax-free?

Not necessarily. The ruling specifically applies to 'genuine pre-estimated losses.' If a payment is actually a hidden fee for a service, it may still be taxable.