Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Maharashtra

GST Classification of Bundled Printing Supplies: Maharashtra Advance Ruling

The Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling decided that bundling printing consumables is a mixed supply, not a composite supply, requiring the highest tax rate.

Ruling
NO.GST-ARA- 38/17-18/2024-25/B-641, Mumbai, dt. 30.12.2025
Dated
30 Dec 2025
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. HP India asked if their printing supply bundle was a composite supply.
  2. The Authority ruled the bundle is a mixed supply, not composite.
  3. Mixed supplies must be taxed at the highest rate among the included items.
  4. The ruling confirms that independent availability of items prevents composite supply classification.

In short

HP India asked the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) how to classify their printing supplies, which include ink and other parts sold together under a single contract. They argued these items were naturally bundled, but the Authority disagreed because customers could also buy these items separately. Because they are not naturally bundled, the tax department classified the package as a mixed supply.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often assumed that if items were sold together under a single contract or pricing model, they could be treated as a single composite supply taxed at the rate of the main item.

What has changed

The Authority decided that if items in a bundle can be bought separately, the bundle is a mixed supply. This means you must apply the highest GST rate found among any of the items in your package to the entire bundle, rather than the rate of the primary item.

Who this affects

Businesses that sell packages of different goods for a single price, especially where those goods could also be purchased individually.

An example

Imagine a stationery company sells a 'Starter Kit' containing a high-tax printer and low-tax paper for one price. If the company also sells the printer and paper separately, this ruling suggests the kit is a mixed supply. The company would likely have to charge the higher printer tax rate on the entire kit. They cannot claim it is a composite supply just because it is convenient to sell them together.

What you should do

Review your bundled product offerings to see if items are sold independently. Remember that this ruling only applies to the company that asked; it is not a law that automatically changes how your business must pay GST. If you are unsure about your tax classification, consult a professional to assess your specific contracts.

If you do nothing

If you incorrectly classify a mixed supply as a composite supply, you will likely underpay your GST. Tax officers may issue a notice for the tax shortfall, plus interest and penalties. Relying on a ruling meant for another company provides no legal protection if your specific facts differ.

The terms explained

Composite supply
A bundle of goods or services that are naturally sold together in the ordinary course of business, where one item is the main supply.
Mixed supply
A combination of two or more individual goods or services sold together for a single price that does not qualify as a composite supply.
Principal supply
The main item in a bundle that gives the package its essential character.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. HP India Sales Private Limited

NO.GST-ARA- 38/17-18/2024-25/B-641, Mumbai, dt. 30.12.2025 · Maharashtra

Questions before the authority

  • Classification of ElectroInk supplied along with consumables under GST.
  • Determination of time and value of supply of ElectroInk with consumables under the indigo press Contract.

Facts

The applicant supplies HP Indigo digital printing presses and associated consumables (ElectroInk, imaging plates, blankets, etc.) to authorized resellers. These supplies are provided under a 'click model' where the reseller is billed based on the number of prints generated, rather than for individual items. The applicant contended that this bundle constitutes a composite supply with ElectroInk as the principal supply.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Classification of ElectroInk with consumablesMixed supply
Attracts the highest rate of tax amongst all goods in the supply
Time and value of supplyTime: earlier of invoice or payment date; Value: transaction value per invoice
Determined under Section 12(2) and Section 31(4) of the CGST Act

The Authority held that the supply of ElectroInk along with consumables and operator parts is a mixed supply, not a composite supply. Consequently, the supply is classified as a mixed supply, attracting the highest rate of tax applicable among the constituent goods. The time of supply is determined as the earlier of the date of invoice or the date of receipt of payment, and the value is the transaction value as reflected in the tax invoice.

Reasoning

The Authority reasoned that the goods are not naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business, as customers have the option to purchase items separately under an 'A La Carte' model. Furthermore, no single item in the bundle qualifies as a 'principal supply' because all components are equally indispensable for the printing process. Therefore, the transaction fails the criteria for a **composite supply** under Section 2(30) and instead meets the definition of a **mixed supply** under Section 2(74) of the CGST Act. The Authority also noted that the billing mechanism does not override the statutory classification of the underlying goods.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 2(30) of the CGST Act
  • Section 2(74) of the CGST Act
  • Section 2(32) of the CGST Act
  • Section 8 of the CGST Act
  • Section 12(2) of the CGST Act
  • Section 15 of the CGST Act
  • Section 31(4) of the CGST Act

For the practitioner

This ruling serves as a warning for businesses that bundle distinct goods under a single price model, even if the bundle is standard industry practice. It clarifies that the existence of an alternative procurement option (like the 'A La Carte' model here) can be fatal to a **composite supply** claim. Practitioners should note that the Authority prioritizes the ability to supply goods independently over the commercial convenience of a bundled pricing model.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/2-ms_hp_india_sales.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 12-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I have to change how I tax my bundles?

Not necessarily. This ruling only binds the company that asked. However, it shows how the tax department thinks, so you should review your bundles to see if they meet the criteria for a mixed supply.

What if my tax officer disagrees with my classification?

If your tax officer believes you have misclassified your supplies, they can issue a demand for the difference in tax. You would then need to provide evidence to support your position or pay the difference.

Can I use this ruling to defend my business in court?

No. An advance ruling is specific to the applicant. While it can be used as a reference to understand the department's logic, it does not set a legal precedent for your business.

How do I know if my bundle is 'naturally bundled'?

The Authority looks at whether the items are typically sold together in the industry and whether the customer has the option to buy them separately. If they are easily bought apart, they are likely not naturally bundled.