Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Rajasthan

GST Rate for Utility Shifting in Highway Projects: RAJ/AAR/2019-20/34

The Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling decided that independent utility shifting work does not qualify for concessional road construction GST rates.

Ruling
RAJ/AAR/2019-20/34 dated 05.03.2020
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. G K Enterprises asked if utility shifting qualifies for concessional GST rates.
  2. The authority ruled the work is independent, not part of the main contract.
  3. Concessional rates for road construction do not apply to this specific activity.

In short

The company asked if moving electrical lines for a highway project counts as a road construction service, which carries a lower Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate. The authority looked at whether this work was part of the main highway contract or a separate task. They decided that because the utility shifting is handled as an independent job, it does not qualify for the special tax benefits meant for road builders.

What has changed

How it worked before

Many businesses assumed that any work performed on a highway project site, including utility shifting, would automatically qualify for the same concessional GST rates as the main road construction contract.

What has changed

The authority clarified that utility shifting is a distinct service. In practice, this means businesses cannot claim the lower tax rate for road construction unless their work is explicitly part of the main highway contract and meets all specific conditions of the tax notification.

Who this affects

Contractors and subcontractors involved in utility shifting, electrical line relocation, or site preparation for infrastructure projects.

An example

A company called PowerRelocate Pvt Ltd is hired to move water pipes for a new highway project. They want to charge the lower GST rate reserved for road construction. Based on this ruling, their tax officer would likely deny this, as the pipe relocation is an independent service and not part of the main road construction contract.

What you should do

If you perform similar work, do not assume you qualify for concessional rates based on this ruling. An Advance Ruling only binds the business that asked and their specific tax officer. You should review your own contract terms with a tax professional to determine your correct GST liability.

If you do nothing

If you apply a lower tax rate without a valid legal basis, you risk a tax demand notice for the unpaid GST plus interest and penalties. A tax officer may view this as an underpayment of tax, which can lead to lengthy audits and financial strain on your business.

The terms explained

Works contract
A contract that involves both the supply of goods and services, typically used in construction or infrastructure projects.
Concessional rate
A lower tax rate offered by the government for specific types of goods or services to encourage certain industries.
Direct nexus
A clear and immediate connection between two things, such as your specific work and the main highway construction contract.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

Gaurish Sharma (M/s G K Enterprises)

RAJ/AAR/2019-20/34 dated 05.03.2020 · Rajasthan

Questions before the authority

  • Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, does the activity carried out by the Applicant falls under Entry No. (iv)(a) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT(R)?
  • Alternatively, whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, does the activity carried out by the Applicant falls under Entry No. (ix) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT(R)?

Facts

The applicant is a proprietorship concern proposing to bid for a contract involving the shifting and erection of 11 KV and LT electrical lines. This work is part of a larger highway development project awarded by NHAI to a main contractor. The applicant sought to determine if their specific activity of utility shifting qualifies for concessional GST rates under specific entries of the Rate Notification.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Applicability of Entry (iv)(a) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT(R)Does not fall under the entry
The activity is restricted to shifting/erection of electrical lines and is not construction of a road
Applicability of Entry (ix) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT(R)Does not fall under the entry
The activity is independent and lacks the required nexus to the main contract awarded by NHAI

The Authority ruled that the applicant's proposed activity does not fall under either of the requested entries. It concluded that the shifting of electrical lines is an independent activity and does not constitute a works contract for the construction of a road or a sub-contract related to the main highway project.

Reasoning

The Authority reasoned that the cost of the utility shifting is borne separately by the authority or the utility-owning entity, establishing that it is not part of the main highway construction contract. Consequently, the applicant cannot be treated as a sub-contractor to the main contractor for the purpose of the cited notifications. The ruling turned on the interpretation of the scope of work defined in the agreement and the specific conditions required to qualify for concessional rates under Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

Provisions relied on

  • Section 97(2) of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017
  • Section 2(119) of the CGST Act
  • Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that **utility shifting activities** performed independently of the main construction contract do not automatically qualify for the concessional GST rates applicable to road construction works contracts. It serves as a warning that sub-contractors must demonstrate a **direct nexus** to the main contract to avail of specific concessional entries. It does not decide the taxability of the service under other headings not specifically requested.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/raj_aar_34_2019-20_05.03.2020_gke.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 20-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An Advance Ruling is only legally binding for the business that requested it and their specific tax officer. It serves as a guide for how the department interprets the law, but it does not automatically apply to your contracts.

Does this mean all utility shifting is taxed at the higher rate?

Not necessarily. This ruling only addresses whether the work qualifies for a specific concessional rate under the cited notification. It does not determine the taxability of the service under other categories.

What should I do if my tax officer disagrees with my tax classification?

You should document the specific terms of your contract and consult with a tax advisor. If you are unsure, you have the option to file your own application for an Advance Ruling to get clarity for your specific situation.