Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Maharashtra

GST Input Tax Credit Denied for Commercial Property Construction

The Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling decided that GST paid on construction costs for commercial rental property cannot be claimed as credit.

Ruling
GST-ARA-88/2019-20/B-30, Mumbai, dated 12.03.2020
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. The company asked if they could claim GST credit on construction costs.
  2. The property was built for the purpose of renting it out.
  3. The Authority ruled that this credit is blocked under GST law.
  4. The ruling confirms that construction expenses for own-account property are ineligible.

In short

The company asked the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) if they could claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the GST paid for building a commercial property they intended to rent out. The authority looked at whether construction costs for a building used for business purposes qualify for tax relief.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses were often uncertain about claiming this credit, especially after some court cases suggested that renting out property might allow for ITC claims.

What has changed

The authority ruled that Section 17(5)(d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act strictly blocks credit for goods and services used to construct immovable property on one's own account. This means you cannot reduce your tax liability by claiming the GST paid on construction materials or services, even if you use the building to earn rental income.

Who this affects

Property developers and business owners who construct commercial buildings on their own land to lease them out.

An example

Imagine a business owner, 'BuildCorp', constructs a warehouse to lease to logistics companies. They want to claim the GST paid on cement and architectural services as input tax credit. Based on this ruling, BuildCorp would likely be denied this credit because the law blocks it for construction on their own account.

What you should do

You should treat this as a warning that the tax department currently views these construction costs as ineligible for credit. Remember that an Advance Ruling only binds the specific business that asked the question and their local tax office; it is not a universal law that applies to your business automatically.

If you do nothing

If you claim this credit and the tax department disagrees, they may issue a demand notice for the unpaid tax plus interest and penalties. Relying on a favorable interpretation that contradicts this ruling could lead to costly litigation. Always consult with a tax professional before claiming credits that are explicitly blocked by the Act.

The terms explained

Input Tax Credit
The tax a business pays on its purchases that it can use to reduce the tax it owes on its own sales.
Blocked Credit
Specific categories of expenses where the government does not allow businesses to claim back the GST paid.
Immovable Property
Physical assets that cannot be moved, such as land, buildings, or warehouses.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. ASHISH ARVIND HANSOTI

GST-ARA-88/2019-20/B-30, Mumbai, dated 12.03.2020 · Maharashtra

Questions before the authority

  • Whether applicant is eligible to claim input tax credit of GST paid on input & input services used for construction of commercial immovable property, subsequently used for renting.

Facts

The applicant is a proprietor engaged in the construction of commercial property on his own account with the intent to lease the premises. The applicant sought an advance ruling on the eligibility to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) for goods and services used during the pre and post-construction phases of this property, which is subsequently used for renting.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Eligibility to claim ITC on construction of commercial property for rentingAnswered in the negative
The applicant is not eligible to claim the input tax credit

The Authority ruled that the applicant is not eligible to claim input tax credit for GST paid on inputs and input services used for the construction of the commercial immovable property. The ruling confirms that such credit is blocked under the provisions of the CGST Act.

Reasoning

The Authority relied on Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, which explicitly bars input tax credit for goods or services received by a taxable person for the construction of an immovable property on his own account. The ruling clarified that this restriction applies even when such property is used for the furtherance of business, such as renting. The Authority distinguished this case from the Safari Retreats judgment by noting that the latter is currently pending before the Supreme Court and that the Authority is not relying on it.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act
  • Section 97 of the CGST Act
  • Section 98 of the CGST Act

For the practitioner

This ruling serves as a **negative precedent** for taxpayers seeking to claim ITC on construction expenses for commercial properties intended for rental income. It reinforces the strict application of the **blocked credit provisions** under Section 17(5)(d) despite arguments regarding the cascading effect of taxes. Practitioners should note that the Authority explicitly declined to follow the Safari Retreats High Court decision due to its pending status in the Supreme Court.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/mah_aar_88_2019-20_b-30_12.03.2020_aah.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 20-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An Advance Ruling only applies to the specific business that requested it. However, it shows how the tax authority interprets the law, which is useful for understanding your own tax risks.

Can I still claim credit if I rent out the property?

According to this ruling, no. The authority stated that the restriction on construction costs applies even if the property is used for business activities like renting.

What if my local tax officer has a different view?

Tax officers generally follow the guidance provided by the Authority for Advance Ruling. If you choose to claim the credit, you must be prepared to defend your position with legal support, as the department is likely to deny it based on this precedent.

Why did the authority ignore other court decisions?

The authority noted that other court cases, such as Safari Retreats, are currently being reviewed by the Supreme Court. Because those cases are not yet finalized, the authority chose to stick to the strict text of the CGST Act.