Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Tamil Nadu

GST on Export Expenses Under DDP Terms: TN/11/ARA/2026

The Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling decided that all costs incurred under DDP export terms must be included in the taxable value.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No. 11/ARA/2026, dated 06.02.2026
Dated
06 Feb 2026
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Arjun Knitwear asked if DDP export costs are part of the taxable value.
  2. The Authority ruled all destination-based expenses must be included in the transaction value.
  3. The Authority declined to rule on whether these costs are eligible for refunds.

In short

The company asked if expenses like ocean freight and foreign import duties, paid under Delivered Duty Paid (DDP) terms, should be included in the value of goods when paying Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST).

What has changed

How it worked before

Many exporters assumed that costs incurred abroad, such as foreign duties or delivery charges, could be excluded from the taxable value as reimbursements or pure agent expenses.

What has changed

The Authority confirmed that because the exporter bears all risks and costs until the final destination under DDP terms, these expenses are part of the price paid for the goods. This means you must pay IGST on the total invoice value, including all these incidental costs, rather than just the base price of the goods.

Who this affects

Exporters who sell goods under DDP terms and pay for shipping, insurance, and foreign duties on behalf of their buyers.

An example

A textile exporter ships goods to Germany under DDP terms, paying for ocean freight and local delivery. They previously excluded these costs from their IGST calculation, treating them as separate reimbursements. Based on this ruling, they should now include these costs in the total transaction value when calculating IGST.

What you should do

Review your export invoices to ensure IGST is calculated on the full DDP value. Remember that this ruling only applies to the company that asked; your local tax officer may have a different view, so consult your tax advisor before changing your billing practices.

If you do nothing

If you exclude these costs and the tax department disagrees, you may face a demand for unpaid IGST plus interest and penalties. Relying on a ruling that does not apply to your specific business can lead to costly disputes with your local tax officer.

The terms explained

Delivered Duty Paid (DDP)
A shipping arrangement where the seller takes on all responsibility, costs, and risks for delivering goods to the buyer's location, including paying import duties.
Transaction Value
The total price actually paid or payable for the goods, which serves as the base amount for calculating the tax due.
Pure Agent
A person who incurs costs on behalf of a client and receives the exact amount back as a reimbursement, without adding a profit margin or taking on the risk of the service.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. Arjun Knit Wear

Advance Ruling No. 11/ARA/2026, dated 06.02.2026 · Tamil Nadu

Questions before the authority

  • When goods are exported with IGST payment, should the transaction value include reimbursed expenses such as ocean freight, insurance, foreign import duties, delivery charges, and other costs incurred abroad until the goods reach their destination under DDP terms, and should IGST be paid on these expenses?
  • If IGST is applicable on the above-mentioned expense, can it be refunded in accordance with the provisions of the GST Act, 2017?

Facts

The applicant is a garment manufacturer exporting goods under Delivered Duty Paid (DDP) terms. Under this arrangement, the applicant bears all costs and risks, including ocean freight, insurance, and foreign import duties, until the goods reach the buyer's destination. These costs are included in the invoice value charged to the foreign buyer.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Inclusion of DDP expenses in transaction valueYes, all expenses are liable to be included in the transaction value.
In terms of Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017, read with Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017.
Refundability of IGST on DDP expensesNot answered.
The Authority stated that matters pertaining to refund are outside the purview of the Authority for Advance Ruling.

The Authority ruled that all expenses incurred by the applicant under DDP terms until the goods reach the buyer's destination are liable to be included in the transaction value for the purpose of payment of IGST. Regarding the second question on refund, the Authority held that it is outside the scope of the Advance Ruling and therefore not required to be answered.

Reasoning

The Authority relied on Section 15(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, which mandates the inclusion of incidental expenses charged by the supplier to the recipient at or before the time of delivery in the transaction value. It observed that under DDP terms, the applicant is not acting as a pure agent, as they bear all risks and costs until the final destination. Consequently, these costs form part of the price actually paid or payable for the supply. The Authority further noted that it lacks jurisdiction to rule on refund claims under Section 97(2) of the CGST Act.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017
  • Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that for exporters operating under DDP terms, all destination-based costs must be **included in the transaction value** for IGST payment purposes. It confirms that such expenses cannot be excluded as pure agent reimbursements. Practitioners should note that the Authority **declined to rule on refund eligibility**, leaving that issue to be determined by the jurisdictional refund authorities.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/1-arjun_knit_wear_aar_order_1.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 12-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An Advance Ruling is only legally binding on the business that requested it and their specific tax office. It serves as a guide to how the authorities interpret the law, but it does not automatically apply to you.

Can I get a refund for the IGST paid on these expenses?

The Authority specifically refused to answer this question, stating it was outside their legal power. You would need to approach your local refund authority to discuss your specific eligibility for a refund.

What if my tax officer disagrees with this ruling?

Since this ruling is not a general law, your local tax officer is not required to follow it. If they disagree, they may issue a notice, and you would need to defend your position based on the facts of your own business.