Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Rajasthan

GST Classification and Place of Supply for Online Coaching Services

The Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling decided that online coaching with human interaction is a training service, not an automated digital service.

Ruling
RAJ/AAR/2025-26/23, dated 25.03.2026
Dated
25 Mar 2026
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Online coaching with live teachers is classified under HSN 999293.
  2. It is not considered an OIDAR service due to significant human intervention.
  3. The place of supply is the provider's location, not the student's location.
  4. Transactions are treated as intra-state supplies, attracting CGST and SGST.

In short

The company asked if their online coaching, which includes live classes and doubt-clearing, should be taxed as an automated digital service or as standard coaching. The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) examined whether the service relies on human teachers or is mostly automated. They concluded that because teachers are actively involved, it is a training service rather than an automated digital product.

What has changed

How it worked before

Many businesses were uncertain whether online education platforms should be classified as OIDAR services, which often carry different tax implications regarding the student's location.

What has changed

The ruling confirms that coaching services with live human interaction are classified as Commercial Training and Coaching services. This means the place of supply is where the coaching provider is based, not where the student lives. Consequently, businesses must charge CGST and SGST instead of IGST for these services, even when students are in other states.

Who this affects

Coaching centers, ed-tech companies, and educational institutions providing live online classes.

An example

A coaching center in Delhi provides live online classes to students across India. They wonder if they should charge IGST because their students are outside Delhi. Based on this ruling, they would likely conclude that their service involves significant human intervention and should be treated as an intra-state supply, charging CGST and SGST instead.

What you should do

If you provide similar services, review your current tax classification. Remember that an Advance Ruling only binds the specific company that asked and its tax office; it is not a universal law for all businesses. Consult your tax advisor to see if your specific service model matches the criteria used in this ruling.

If you do nothing

If you incorrectly classify your services or apply the wrong tax, you risk a demand notice from tax authorities for unpaid taxes, interest, and potential penalties. A tax officer may disagree with your interpretation if your service model differs from the one in this ruling. Relying on a ruling that does not apply to your specific facts can lead to costly disputes during an audit.

The terms explained

OIDAR
Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval services are digital services provided over the internet with minimal human intervention, such as automated software or streaming content.
Intra-state supply
A transaction where the location of the supplier and the place of supply are in the same state, requiring the payment of both CGST and SGST.
Place of supply
The location where a service is deemed to be provided for tax purposes, which determines whether CGST/SGST or IGST applies.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s ALLEN CAREER INSTITUTE PRIVATE LIMITED

RAJ/AAR/2025-26/23, dated 25.03.2026 · Rajasthan

Questions before the authority

  • Whether supply of online training services (delivered through live/recorded digital platforms) shall qualify as "online information or database access retrieval service" under HSN 998433 (i.e. On-line video content) or should be covered under HSN code 999293 (i.e. Commercial Training and Coaching Services)?
  • Determination of the tax liability under the CGST and SGST Acts especially when the student is based in a state outside Rajasthan?

Facts

The applicant is an education institution providing coaching for competitive exams like IIT-JEE and NEET. They offer both offline classroom coaching and digital programs through an e-learning platform, which include live classes, pre-recorded content, and doubt-clearing sessions. The applicant sought a ruling on the classification of these online services and the applicable place of supply for students located outside Rajasthan.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Classification of online training servicesClassified as Commercial Training and Coaching services with SAC 999293
Does not qualify as OIDAR services
Tax liability for students outside RajasthanLiability is 9% CGST and 9% SGST
Supply is treated as intra-state

The Authority ruled that the applicant's online training services are classified as Commercial Training and Coaching services under HSN 999293, not as OIDAR services. Consequently, the place of supply is determined to be within the State of Rajasthan, making the transactions intra-state supplies regardless of the student's location.

Reasoning

The Authority reasoned that the services involve significant human intervention, such as live teaching, mentoring, and performance tracking, which contradicts the OIDAR requirement of being essentially automated with minimal human intervention. Relying on Section 12(5) of the IGST Act, the Authority determined that training services are specifically governed by the location where the services are actually performed. Since the applicant's operations, including content development and faculty instruction, are centralized in Rajasthan, the place of supply is Rajasthan. Therefore, the transaction is an **intra-state supply** under Section 8(2) of the IGST Act, attracting CGST and SGST.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 97(2) of CGST/RGST Act, 2017
  • Section 2(17) of IGST Act, 2017
  • Section 8(2) of IGST Act, 2017
  • Section 12(5) of IGST Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that **online coaching services** provided by institutions with significant human involvement do not qualify as OIDAR services. Practitioners should note that for such entities, the place of supply is the location of the service provider, resulting in **intra-state tax liability** even for students located in other states. It reinforces the importance of the 'impossibility test' and human intervention in distinguishing coaching from automated digital content services.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/order_allen_career_institute_pvt._ltd._compressed.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 12-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I must change how I charge GST?

Not necessarily. This ruling only applies to the company that asked. You should evaluate whether your service model involves similar levels of human intervention before changing your tax treatment.

Is this ruling binding on my state's tax department?

No. An Advance Ruling is only binding on the applicant and the tax authorities in that specific jurisdiction. Other states may have different views on the same issue.

What if my tax officer disagrees with this ruling?

Tax officers are not bound by rulings issued to other companies. If your officer disagrees, you may face a dispute, which is why you should seek professional advice tailored to your specific business operations.