Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Gujarat

Gujarat GST Advance Ruling on Blasting Services as Composite Supply

Ruling
GUJ/GAAR/RULING/2018/17 dated 27.08.2018
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

In short

The company asked the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (GAAR) whether their blasting work is a supply of goods or a supply of service under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) law. They argued it was a service because they do not sell the explosives to the client, but the authority disagreed.

What has changed

How it worked before

Many businesses in the mining and construction sectors assumed that blasting work was purely a service because the explosives are consumed during the process rather than sold. They often billed these activities as professional services without accounting for the goods component separately.

What has changed

The authority ruled that blasting is a composite supply, meaning it involves both goods and services provided together. In practice, this means you must treat the activity as a single package where the tax treatment follows the principal supply, rather than ignoring the explosives used.

Who this affects

This ruling is relevant for contractors in the mining, quarrying, and construction industries who perform blasting activities using their own explosives for clients.

What you should do

You should review your current billing and tax classification if you perform similar blasting work. Remember that an Advance Ruling only binds the specific business that asked for it and their local tax office, so it does not automatically change the law for your own business or state.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. Khedut Hat

GUJ/GAAR/RULING/2018/17 dated 27.08.2018 · Gujarat

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the blasting activity carried out by the applicant is to be considered as a 'supply of goods' or 'supply of service'?

Facts

The applicant is engaged in blasting work at various sites using explosives procured under a license. The applicant performs the blasting activity for clients, which involves filling holes with explosives and detonating them in a specific sequence. The applicant argued that since title to the explosives is not transferred to the client, the activity should be treated as a supply of service.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Classification of blasting activityComposite supply
Covered under Section 2(30) and Section 8(a) of the CGST/GGST Act

The authority ruled that the blasting activity constitutes a **composite supply** of goods and services. It rejected the applicant's contention that the activity is purely a supply of service.

Reasoning

The authority relied on the Supreme Court judgment in State of Gujarat vs. Bharat Pest Control to determine that the use of explosives in blasting work constitutes a deemed supply of goods alongside the service component. Consequently, the activity is classified as a **composite supply** under Section 2(30) of the CGST Act. The authority noted that the definition of supply is inclusive and that Schedule II is not exhaustive for determining the scope of supply.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 2(30) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 8(a) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 97(2)(g) of the CGST Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that blasting services involving the use of explosives are treated as a **composite supply** rather than a pure service. It is useful for practitioners advising clients in the mining or construction sector who provide similar integrated services. It does not, however, provide specific guidance on the tax rate applicable to such composite supplies.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/guj.17-2018-19_dt_27.08.18_kedh.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 21-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I can automatically classify my blasting work as a composite supply?

No, this ruling is specific to the company that asked the question. While it shows how the Gujarat authority interprets the law, it does not serve as a universal rule for every business in India.

Is this decision binding on my local tax officer in a different state?

No, an Advance Ruling is only legally binding on the applicant and the tax authorities in that specific jurisdiction. Your local tax officer may consider the logic used here, but they are not required to follow it.

What happens if my tax officer disagrees with this interpretation?

If your tax officer takes a different view, you may face a dispute regarding your tax classification. You should consult with a tax professional to document your position based on the specific facts of your contracts.

Does this ruling tell me which GST rate to apply to my blasting services?

No, this ruling only clarifies that the activity is a composite supply rather than a pure service. It does not provide specific guidance on the tax rate, which depends on the nature of the principal supply.