Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Gujarat

Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling Rejects Kandla Port Trust GST Query

Ruling
GUJ/GAAR/ADM/2018/30 dated 30.07.2018
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

In short

The Kandla Port Trust asked the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) if it must pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) on disputed lease amounts and how to claim a refund later. The authority refused to answer these questions because they fall outside the specific legal topics it is allowed to decide.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often assumed that the AAR could provide guidance on any tax-related uncertainty, including procedural questions about refunds or ongoing litigation. Many entities believed that if they were unsure about a tax liability arising from a legal dispute, the authority would offer a definitive path forward.

What has changed

The authority clarified that it only has the power to rule on specific issues like tax classification, valuation, and the determination of tax liability under Section 97(2) of the GST Act. This means that if your question is about general litigation strategy or the mechanics of claiming a refund, the AAR will reject your application without looking at the merits of your case.

Who this affects

This ruling is relevant for any business owner or entity involved in long-term commercial disputes, such as lease disagreements or contract litigation, where tax payments are being contested.

What you should do

You should not assume that an Advance Ruling can resolve your specific procedural or refund-related disputes, as the authority has strictly limited jurisdiction. Remember that an AAR decision is only binding on the specific business that asked the question and its own tax officer, so it does not automatically apply to your business or change the law for everyone else.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

Kandla Port Trust (Deendayal Port Trust)

GUJ/GAAR/ADM/2018/30 dated 30.07.2018 · Gujarat

Questions before the authority

  • Whether DPT shall continue to pay GST on disputed claim?
  • How is it possible for DPT to claim refund for GST paid out of pocket, if the matter / dispute concluded in favour of party / lease holder, considering the fact that it may conclude after period of 2 or more years?

Facts

The applicant, a major port trust, revised its land lease rates as per the directions of the Tariff Authority of Major Ports. Several lessees challenged these revised rates, leading to ongoing litigation and non-payment of the disputed lease rent and associated GST by the lessees. The applicant has been paying the GST on these disputed amounts out of its own pocket and sought guidance on its continued liability and the mechanism for claiming refunds if the disputes are eventually decided against it.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Liability to pay GST on disputed claims and refund mechanismRejected
The Authority lacked jurisdiction to decide these issues under Section 97(2).

The Authority rejected the application at the admission stage without addressing the merits of the questions. It held that the issues raised do not fall within the scope of matters that can be decided under the Advance Ruling mechanism.

Reasoning

The Authority examined its jurisdiction under Section 97(2) of the CGST and GGST Acts, which limits its power to specific issues such as classification, valuation, and tax liability. It concluded that the questions regarding the obligation to pay tax on disputed claims and the procedure for claiming refunds for such payments do not fall under any of the categories enumerated in Section 97(2). Consequently, the Authority determined it was **lacking jurisdiction** to entertain the application and rejected it under Section 98(2) of the Acts.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 96 of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
  • Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 97(2) of the GGST Act, 2017
  • Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 98(2) of the GGST Act, 2017

For the practitioner

This ruling serves as a reminder that the Advance Ruling Authority is a creature of statute with **strictly limited jurisdiction**. It does not provide a forum for resolving general commercial disputes, litigation strategy, or procedural refund queries that fall outside the specific list of issues defined in Section 97(2). Practitioners should avoid approaching the AAR for guidance on tax administration or refund mechanics arising from ongoing civil or commercial litigation.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/guj.30-2018-19_dt_30.07.18_kpt.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 21-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this mean I can use this ruling to support my own refund claim?

No, you cannot use this ruling to support your claim because the authority rejected the application without deciding on the merits. It serves only as a reminder that the AAR is not the correct forum for these types of procedural questions.

Is this decision binding on my local tax office?

No, an Advance Ruling is only binding on the specific applicant who filed the request and the tax officer assigned to that business. It does not set a legal precedent that your local tax officer is required to follow.

What should I do if my tax officer disagrees with my interpretation of a tax law?

If you have a disagreement with your tax officer, you should consult with a tax professional to review your specific facts and the relevant sections of the GST Act. The AAR is not a court of law and cannot be used to settle disputes between you and your local tax department.

Can I ask the AAR for help with my ongoing court case?

The AAR will not provide guidance on matters that are already the subject of litigation or that fall outside the specific categories listed in Section 97(2) of the GST Act. You should rely on your legal counsel to manage your strategy for ongoing court cases.