Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Andhra Pradesh

No GST Ruling Issued for Tobacco Commission Agent Due to Panel Disagreement

The Andhra Pradesh tax panel issued no ruling for Jayalakshmi Tobacco Company after its members disagreed on GST for tobacco commission agents.

Ruling
Order No. 03 /AAR/AP/GST/2018 dated 08.06.2018
Dated
08 Jun 2018
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Jayalakshmi Tobacco Company asked if GST applies to tobacco commission agents
  2. State and Central tax members expressed completely opposite views on GST exemption
  3. No official ruling was issued because the panel failed to reach a consensus
  4. The case was referred to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for decision

In short

A tobacco commission agent in Andhra Pradesh asked the tax department whether Goods and Services Tax (GST) applies to auctioning tobacco leaves for farmers and traders, and whether agents with turnover under Rs. 20 lakh must register. The panel at the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) could not answer because the State tax officer and Central tax officer strongly disagreed with each other.

What has changed

How it worked before

Before this case, commission agents selling agricultural goods like tobacco leaves had conflicting assumptions about whether their services were fully exempt from GST or required mandatory registration.

What has changed

Nothing changed regarding tax liabilities because the authority failed to issue a verdict under order AAR/AP/03(GST)/2018. The State tax officer felt sales for traders attract GST, while the Central tax officer felt agricultural commission agents are fully exempt. Because of this deadlock, the matter was forwarded to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) without setting any tax rule.

Who this affects

Commission agents and auctioneers dealing in tobacco leaves and other agricultural produce for farmers or traders.

An example

A trader in Guntur operates as a commission agent selling tobacco leaves for local farmers, earning Rs. 15 lakh annually. They look up order AAR/AP/03(GST)/2018 to decide if they can stop collecting GST. They discover that the tax officers on the panel disagreed, leaving the case unresolved, so they cannot use this document to claim a GST exemption.

What you should do

Do not rely on the individual opinions expressed in a split decision, as they carry no legal authority. An advance ruling applies only to the business that requested it, and since no ruling was issued here, businesses must consult a tax advisor or file a fresh application for their own operations.

If you do nothing

If a business relies on the favorable opinion of one member in a split decision, tax officers during an audit can reject it. The business could face demands for unpaid GST, interest, and penalties because a split decision creates no legal protection.

The terms explained

commission agent
A person who buys or sells goods on behalf of another person for a fee or percentage.
reverse charge mechanism
A situation where the buyer pays GST directly to the government instead of paying it to the seller.
advance ruling
An official decision by tax authorities answering a specific business's question about how GST applies to them.
appellate authority for advance ruling
A higher tax body that decides appeals or resolves split decisions from the advance ruling authority.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s JAYALAKSHMI TOBACCO COMPANY

Order No. 03 /AAR/AP/GST/2018 dated 08.06.2018 · Andhra Pradesh

Questions before the authority

  • Will GST be applicable on sale of tobacco leaves received from farmers made by Commission Agent in an auction and his turnover is less than Rs.20 Lakh?
  • In case, there is GST in the above situation, who has to pay the tax?
  • Will reverse charge provisions applicable for tobacco leaves or not?
  • Who has to pay GST when commission agent sell the tobacco leaves received from trader in an auction? Can commission agent collect GST from buyers and pay or not?
  • The Commission Agent receives tobacco from farmers and sell them within the state. He takes commission from farmers for his services and it is less than Rs. 20 Lakh in a year. Will the Commission Agent is liable to collect GST in this situation?

Facts

The applicant is a commission agent dealing with tobacco leaves, procuring them from farmers as well as traders to sell in auctions. The applicant receives commission for its services and sought an advance ruling on GST applicability, reverse charge applicability, tax payment liability, and registration requirements.

Ruling

The two-member Authority expressed **different views** on the questions raised and found no consensus to pronounce a ruling. Consequently, as per Section 98(5) of the CGST/APGST Act, 2017, the application was treated as **ruling not issued** and referred to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for further action.

Reasoning

The State Tax Member held that sales on behalf of traders require mandatory registration under Section 24 and attract GST, while commission received from farmers is exempt if turnover thresholds are met. Conversely, the Central Tax Member viewed services by commission agents for sale or purchase of agricultural produce (tobacco leaves) as fully exempt with NIL rate under Sl. No. 24 of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate). Due to this irreconcilable difference of opinion between the members, no consensus could be reached under Section 98(5) of the CGST/APGST Act, 2017, requiring referral to the Appellate Authority.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 98(5) of CGST / APGST Act, 2017
  • Section 2(5) of CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 2(6) of CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 7(1) of CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 15 of CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 23 of CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 24 of CGST Act, 2017
  • Schedule I of CGST Act, 2017
  • Notification No. 04/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017
  • Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017

For the practitioner

This order highlights the procedural outcome when AAR members disagree, resulting in **no ruling being issued** and an automatic referral to the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling under Section 98(5). Practitioners cannot rely on individual member findings attached to a split decision as binding precedent. The substantive taxability of tobacco commission agents remained unresolved at this forum level.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/ap_03-2018_08.06.18_jayalakshmi_tobacco_co.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 19-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Can I use this ruling to claim GST exemption on tobacco commission?

No. The panel members disagreed, so no official ruling was passed. You cannot quote this order to claim any tax benefit.

What happens when two AAR panel members disagree?

Under Section 98(5) of the GST law, if the members cannot reach a consensus, no ruling is issued. The issue is automatically referred to the higher appellate authority for a decision.

Is an advance ruling binding on all businesses in India?

No. An advance ruling binds only the specific business that asked the question and its immediate tax officer.

Do commission agents with under 20 lakh turnover need GST registration?

Registration depends on whether you buy and sell in your own name or strictly act as an agent. Because this case was left undecided, you should seek legal advice based on your contract terms.

Can I cite the Central tax member's opinion to my tax officer?

No. An individual member's opinion in a split order holds no legal weight and cannot be used as a binding precedent.