Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu GST Advance Ruling TN/26/AAR/2023: Application Withdrawn

The Authority for Advance Ruling closed this case without a decision because the business withdrew its request.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No. 26/AAR/2023, Dated: 24.08.2023
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Foster Wheeler (G.B.) Ltd. asked about tax on shared legal costs.
  2. The company requested to withdraw their application before a decision.
  3. The Authority closed the case without ruling on the tax issue.

In short

The company asked the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Tamil Nadu whether sharing legal costs with their Indian office counts as a taxable supply under Goods and Services Tax (GST). They also asked if they needed to pay tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM).

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses often look to advance rulings to understand if cost-sharing between a foreign head office and an Indian project office is taxable.

What has changed

Nothing changed because the authority did not issue a decision. The case was closed purely for procedural reasons, meaning there is no new guidance on how to treat these shared costs.

Who this affects

Project offices or Indian branches of foreign companies that share expenses with their head office.

An example

Imagine a software company in Bangalore that shares legal fees with its parent company in the UK. They might hope this ruling tells them if they owe GST on those shared costs. Since this ruling was withdrawn, it offers no help, and the company must still determine its tax liability based on current GST laws.

What you should do

Do not use this ruling to support any tax position. Because the authority did not decide the merits of the case, this document provides no legal guidance for your business. You must consult your own tax advisor to determine how to handle cost-sharing arrangements.

If you do nothing

If you assume this ruling sets a precedent, you risk miscalculating your tax liability. A tax officer is not bound by a withdrawn application and may still demand tax, interest, and penalties if they disagree with your interpretation of the law.

The terms explained

Advance Ruling
A written decision from tax authorities that clarifies how GST laws apply to a specific business transaction.
Reverse Charge Mechanism
A system where the person receiving a service pays the tax directly to the government instead of the person providing the service.
Supply
Any form of sale, transfer, or exchange of goods or services made for a price that triggers a tax liability.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

Foster Wheeler (G.B.) Limited, Project Office

Advance Ruling No. 26/AAR/2023, Dated: 24.08.2023 · Tamil Nadu

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the legal cost apportionment by FWEL to the Applicant amounts to the supply under GST?
  • If so, whether the Applicant is required to pay tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM)?

Facts

The applicant is a Project Office in India established by Foster Wheeler (G.B.) Limited (FWEL) to execute consultancy services for a project. Following arbitration proceedings with a client, FWEL incurred legal expenses and subsequently recharged these costs to the applicant on a cost-to-cost basis without any mark-up. The applicant sought a ruling on whether this cost apportionment constitutes a taxable supply under GST and if it attracts RCM.

Ruling

The authority did not address the merits of the questions raised. The applicant requested to withdraw their application for an advance ruling, and the authority disposed of the application as withdrawn.

Reasoning

The applicant submitted a request to withdraw their application via email dated 26.07.2023. Consequently, the Authority for Advance Ruling treated the application as withdrawn without examining the merits or detailed facts of the case. No specific provisions were interpreted as the ruling was purely procedural.

For the practitioner

This order provides no guidance on the taxability of cost apportionment or the applicability of RCM in this context. It serves only as a record of the applicant's decision to withdraw their request for an advance ruling. Practitioners cannot rely on this document for any legal precedent regarding the subject matter.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/26_foster_wheeler.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 16-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I don't have to pay GST on shared costs?

No. This ruling does not say anything about whether shared costs are taxable. It only records that the applicant decided not to proceed with their question.

Can I use this document to defend my tax filing?

No. Because the authority did not rule on the merits of the case, this document has no legal weight and cannot be used as a precedent.

Is this ruling binding on my tax officer?

No. An advance ruling is only binding on the specific business that asked the question and their local tax office. Since this case was withdrawn, it is not binding on anyone.