Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Tamil Nadu

GST on Software Sub-licensing and Market Support Fees: TN/24/AAR/2023

The Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling clarified that software sub-licensing is a supply of goods and affects how inter-company fees are taxed.

Ruling
Advance Ruling No. 24 /AAR/2023 Dated: 20.06.2023
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Software sub-licensing to end-users is classified as a supply of goods.
  2. Market Support fees are treated as additional taxable consideration for the supply.
  3. Payments to related entities must follow Rule 28 for valuation purposes.

In short

The company asked the Tamil Nadu Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) how to tax software sub-licensing and payments made to its global parent company. The authority decided that because the software is pre-developed and delivered via keys, it is a supply of goods. Furthermore, any extra fees received to guarantee profit margins are part of the taxable value of that supply.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses were often uncertain whether software distribution should be classified as a supply of goods or a service, leading to inconsistent tax treatment.

What has changed

The ruling confirms that pre-developed software is a supply of goods. It also mandates that performance-based payments from a parent company must be included in the taxable value of the software supply, and payments to related entities must follow specific valuation rules.

Who this affects

Software distributors and subsidiaries of multinational companies that pay or receive fees for distribution rights or market support.

An example

Imagine a local subsidiary of a foreign software firm that receives 'incentive payments' from its parent to maintain a specific profit margin. Under this ruling, the subsidiary must include those incentive payments in the total value of the software they sell to Indian customers. They cannot treat these payments as separate, non-taxable income. They must also ensure their inter-company fee calculations strictly follow Rule 28 of the CGST Rules.

What you should do

This ruling only applies to the company that asked the question. If your business has a similar arrangement, you should consult a tax professional to see if these principles apply to your specific contracts, as your local tax officer is not legally bound by this decision.

If you do nothing

If you assume this ruling applies to you and calculate your taxes incorrectly, you risk a tax audit and penalties. A tax officer may disagree with your interpretation, leading to demands for unpaid tax, interest, and potential fines for under-reporting.

The terms explained

Supply of goods
The transfer of ownership or rights to use physical or digital products, which is taxed differently than providing a service.
Additional consideration
Any extra money or benefit received by a seller in connection with a sale, which must be added to the price when calculating GST.
Related persons
Entities that are connected through ownership or management, such as a parent company and its subsidiary, which triggers stricter tax valuation rules.
Rule 28
A specific regulation under the GST law that dictates how to determine the value of a transaction between related parties.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

AVEVA Software Private Limited

Advance Ruling No. 24 /AAR/2023 Dated: 20.06.2023 · Tamil Nadu

Questions before the authority

  • Whether GST is applicable on sub-licensing of the software by the applicant to end-users in India? If yes, then what shall be the value of supply?
  • Whether GST is applicable on the 'Market Support fees' received by the applicant from Central Hub?
  • Whether the taxable value for the operating fees paid to Central Hub by the applicant pursuant to the said arrangement shall be determined as per Rule 28 of the Tax Valuation Rules prescribed in CGST Rules 2017?

Facts

The applicant is a subsidiary of AVEVA Group Plc and acts as a non-exclusive distributor for software products in the territory of India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Maldives. Under an Operating Agreement, the applicant sub-licenses software to end-users and receives 'Market Support fees' from the Central Hub if their profit margin falls below a guaranteed level. The applicant also pays an 'Operating fee' to the Central Hub for the distribution rights granted.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
GST applicability on sub-licensingTaxable as a supply of goods
Value is the actual transaction value charged to the end-user
GST on Market Support feesTaxable as additional consideration
Forms part of the value of supply under Section 15 of the GST Act
Valuation of operating fees paid to Central HubDetermined as per Rule 28 of the CGST Rules
Applicable as the parties are related persons

The authority ruled that the sub-licensing of software to end-users in India constitutes a supply of goods subject to GST based on the actual transaction value. Market Support fees received from the Central Hub are considered additional consideration for the supply and form part of the taxable value. The taxable value for the operating fees paid to the Central Hub must be determined in accordance with Rule 28 of the CGST Rules.

Reasoning

The authority determined that the software supplied is pre-developed and made available via encryption keys, qualifying it as a supply of goods under the CGST Act. Market Support fees were deemed to be **additional consideration** for the supply, as they are received in relation to the applicant's obligations under the agreement. Regarding the operating fees paid to the Central Hub, the authority held that the parties are **related persons**, necessitating valuation under Rule 28 of the CGST Rules rather than Section 15(1).

Provisions relied on

  • Section 7 of the CGST Act
  • Section 9 of the CGST Act
  • Section 15 of the CGST Act
  • Section 2(11) of the IGST Act
  • Rule 28 of the CGST Rules 2017
  • Notification No. 1/2017-IT (Rate)
  • Notification No. 13/2017-CT (Rate)

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that sub-licensing of pre-developed software is treated as a **supply of goods** rather than services. It provides a precedent for treating performance-based compensation (Market Support fees) as part of the taxable value of supply. Practitioners should note that the valuation of inter-company payments between related entities for distribution rights must strictly adhere to **Rule 28 of the CGST Rules**.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/24_aar_2023aveva.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 17-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Is this ruling binding on my business?

No. An Advance Ruling is only binding on the company that requested it and the tax authorities dealing with that specific case.

Does this mean all software sales are now goods?

This ruling specifically addresses pre-developed software delivered via encryption keys. Other types of software development or custom services may still be treated differently.

What if my tax officer disagrees with this ruling?

Since this ruling is not a law that applies to everyone, your tax officer is free to form their own view based on your specific contracts and the law. You should rely on your own professional advice rather than assuming this ruling protects you.

How do I know if I am a 'related person'?

Generally, if one company controls the other, or if they share common ownership or management, they are considered related. You should check your specific corporate structure against the definitions in the GST Act.