GST Advance Ruling Application Rejected Due to Pending Investigation
The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling rejected an application because an investigation into the same matter was already underway.
- Ruling
- 26/WBAAR/2018-19 dated 21.12.2018
- Authority
- Authority for Advance Ruling
This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.
The short version
- Ashok Rubber Industries asked for a GST classification for rice polishers.
- The authority found an active investigation under Section 71 against the company.
- The law prohibits advance rulings if proceedings on the same issue are pending.
- The application was rejected without deciding the classification of the goods.
In short
Ashok Rubber Industries asked the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) to classify their rubber rice polishers for GST purposes. However, the authority discovered that tax officials had already started an investigation into the company's affairs before the application was filed. Because the law forbids the AAR from answering questions that are already being examined in other proceedings, they refused to hear the case.
What has changed
How it worked before
Businesses often assumed that they could seek an advance ruling to clarify tax positions even if routine departmental inquiries were ongoing.
What has changed
The authority confirmed that any active investigation under Section 71 of the GST Act acts as a total bar to filing for an advance ruling. This means if your business is already under scrutiny for a specific tax issue, you cannot use the advance ruling process to get a separate opinion on that same issue.
Who this affects
Any business owner currently facing a GST investigation or audit who is considering applying for an advance ruling on the same topic.
An example
Imagine a manufacturer of industrial belts is under investigation by GST officers regarding their tax classification. They decide to file for an advance ruling to get a favorable opinion on the same classification. Because the investigation is already active, the authority will reject their application immediately, just as they did with Ashok Rubber Industries.
What you should do
Check if your business is currently subject to any investigation or audit proceedings before applying for an advance ruling. Remember that an advance ruling is only binding on the specific business that requested it and its own tax officer; it does not set a general law for all businesses.
If you do nothing
If you file for an advance ruling while an investigation is pending, your application will be rejected, and you will lose the filing fees. Furthermore, it signals to the tax department that you are actively seeking a way to bypass ongoing scrutiny, which may complicate your existing case.
The terms explained
- Advance Ruling
- A formal decision provided by tax authorities to a business to clarify how GST applies to their specific goods or services.
- Section 71
- A part of the GST law that gives tax officers the power to access a business's premises to inspect records and accounts.
- Proceedings
- Any formal action, investigation, or inquiry initiated by tax authorities against a business under the GST Act.
The ruling in detail
Authority for Advance Ruling
Ashok Rubber Industries
26/WBAAR/2018-19 dated 21.12.2018 · West Bengal
Questions before the authority
- Classification of rice polisher made of flexible and elastic rubber
Facts
The applicant is a manufacturer of rice polishers made of flexible and elastic rubber. They sought an advance ruling regarding the classification of these goods under the GST Act. However, the authority was informed that investigation proceedings under section 71 had already been initiated against the applicant prior to the filing of the application.
Ruling
| Question | What the authority ruled |
|---|---|
| Classification of rice polisher | Rejected Application not admitted due to pending proceedings |
The authority rejected the application for advance ruling. It held that because proceedings concerning the same question were already pending against the applicant, the application could not be admitted.
Reasoning
The authority relied on the first proviso to section 98(2) of the GST Act, which prohibits the admission of an application if the question raised is already pending in any proceedings. The authority noted that investigation proceedings under section 71 were initiated on 31/07/2018, which predated the online filing of the application on 22/11/2018. It clarified that the law does not distinguish between the stages or nature of proceedings, and any lawful action under the Act constitutes proceedings. Consequently, the authority concluded it lacked the jurisdiction to entertain the request.
Provisions relied on
- Section 71 of the GST Act
- Section 97(2)(a) of the CGST/WBGST Acts, 2017
- Section 98(2) of the GST Act
For the practitioner
This ruling serves as a procedural reminder that an **advance ruling application is barred** if any investigation or proceedings under the GST Act are already pending regarding the same subject matter. Practitioners should verify the status of any ongoing departmental investigations before filing, as the **proviso to section 98(2)** is strictly applied regardless of whether a show cause notice has been issued. It does not provide any guidance on the actual classification of the goods in question.
Source
This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.
Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/wb_26_2018-19_dt_21.12.2018-ashok_rubber_ind.pdf
Legibility of the scan, as read: high.
Prepared 20-10-2026.
About Patron Accounting LLP
Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.
Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.
We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:
- Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
- Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
- Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
- Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
- Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009
If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.