Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Appellate orders (AAAR) West Bengal

GST on Unadjusted Pre-GST Mobilization Advances

The Appellate Authority ruled that mobilization advances remaining unadjusted on July 1, 2017, are subject to GST.

Ruling
Appeal Case No. 11/WBAAAR/APPEAL/2019 dated 17.09.2019; Order dated 16.12.2019
Authority
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Siemens Limited asked if GST applies to unadjusted pre-GST mobilization advances.
  2. The authority ruled the entire unadjusted balance is taxable under GST.
  3. The ruling denies pre-GST tax treatment for these outstanding amounts.

In short

The company asked whether they must pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) on the full invoice amount or only on the net amount after subtracting old mobilization advances received before GST began. The authority decided that any advance money still sitting on the books on July 1, 2017, is treated as a new taxable supply under the GST law.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses generally assumed that advances received under the old service tax regime would not be subject to GST if the work was completed or adjusted later.

What has changed

The authority ruled that unadjusted advances do not count as 'deposits' and are taxable immediately upon the transition to GST. This means businesses must pay GST on the full value of these outstanding balances, effectively increasing the tax cost for long-term contracts.

Who this affects

Construction and infrastructure companies with long-term contracts that received mobilization advances before July 2017.

An example

Imagine a construction firm that received a 10 lakh rupee mobilization advance in 2015 for a project. By July 2017, only 6 lakhs were adjusted against work done, leaving 4 lakhs unadjusted. Based on this ruling, the firm would be required to pay GST on that remaining 4 lakh balance as if it were a new payment received on July 1, 2017.

What you should do

If you have similar unadjusted advances, review your contracts and tax filings. Remember that an advance ruling only binds the company that asked and its specific tax office; it is not a law that automatically applies to your business.

If you do nothing

If you assume this ruling does not apply and fail to pay GST on such advances, your local tax officer may issue a demand notice for the unpaid tax plus interest and penalties. Relying on a ruling that does not cover your specific case can lead to costly litigation and unexpected financial liabilities.

The terms explained

Mobilization advance
An upfront payment made by a client to a contractor to help them start a project, such as buying materials or hiring staff.
Advance ruling
A formal decision from tax authorities on how GST applies to a specific business transaction.
Consideration
The payment or value given in exchange for goods or services provided.

The ruling in detail

Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s Siemens Ltd

Appeal Case No. 11/WBAAAR/APPEAL/2019 dated 17.09.2019; Order dated 16.12.2019 · West Bengal

Questions before the authority

  • Whether GST shall be charged on the gross amount of the invoice raised under GST regime or net amount of invoice after adjustment of lump-sum amount outstanding as on 30.06.2017.

Facts

The appellant entered into a contract with Kolkata Metro Rail Corporation Limited (KMRCL) for design, supply, and installation services before the inception of GST. They received a mobilization advance in 2011, a portion of which remained unadjusted as of 01.07.2017. The appellant sought a ruling on whether GST applies to the gross invoice amount or the net amount after adjusting the pre-GST outstanding advance.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
Taxability of unadjusted mobilization advanceThe entire unadjusted amount of Rs. 13,80,74,549/- is taxable on 01.07.2017.
The amount is treated as an advance paid on 01.07.2017.

The Appellate Authority upheld the original ruling, determining that the unadjusted mobilization advance as of 01.07.2017 is taxable under the GST regime. It concluded that the entire unadjusted amount must be treated as if it were credited on 01.07.2017, thereby attracting GST on that date.

Reasoning

The authority reasoned that upon the introduction of GST, the erstwhile Finance Act, 1994 ceased to exist, and the transaction must be governed by the GST Act. It held that the unadjusted advance does not qualify as a deposit under the proviso to section 2(31) of the GST Act because it was not applied as consideration for a supply prior to the GST regime. Consequently, the time of supply is determined by section 13(2) of the GST Act, making the outstanding balance taxable immediately upon the transition to GST.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 100(1) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
  • Section 97 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
  • Section 2(31) of the GST Act
  • Section 13(2) of the GST Act

For the practitioner

This ruling clarifies that **unadjusted mobilization advances** received in the pre-GST era are subject to GST upon the transition to the new regime. It serves as a warning that such balances will be treated as taxable advances on the appointed day, effectively **denying the benefit of pre-GST tax treatment** for unadjusted amounts. Practitioners should note that the authority strictly interpreted the definition of 'deposit' to exclude these advances.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/2024-02/wb_aaar_11_2019_17.09.2019.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 13-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I must pay GST on all old advances?

This ruling specifically addresses unadjusted mobilization advances as of July 1, 2017. It does not necessarily apply to every type of old payment, so you should consult your tax advisor regarding your specific contract terms.

Is this ruling binding on my business in a different state?

No. An advance ruling is only legally binding on the company that requested it and the tax authorities overseeing that specific case. It serves as a guide for how authorities might view similar issues, but it is not a universal law.

What if my local tax officer disagrees with this interpretation?

Tax officers have the authority to interpret the law based on your specific facts. If they disagree with your position, you may face a dispute, which is why it is important to document your reasoning and seek professional advice before filing.