Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Appellate orders (AAAR) Gujarat

GST Input Tax Credit on Mandatory Canteen Services for Employees

Companies can claim GST input tax credit on mandatory canteen services, but only for the portion of costs they pay themselves.

Ruling
GUJ/GAAAR/APPEAL/2022/23 dated 22.12.2022
Authority
Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

The short version

  1. Tata Motors asked if they could claim GST credit on canteen services.
  2. The authority ruled credit is allowed because the canteen is legally mandatory.
  3. Credit is restricted to the cost the employer pays, not the employee's share.

In short

The company asked if they could claim input tax credit (ITC) on the GST paid to canteen service providers for their employees. Because the law requires factories to provide these facilities, the authority had to decide if this service counts as a business expense eligible for tax relief.

What has changed

How it worked before

Businesses were often unsure if canteen services were blocked under GST rules, leading to inconsistent claims for input tax credit.

What has changed

The authority confirmed that when a canteen is mandatory under the Factories Act, the employer can claim GST credit. However, you must calculate this credit only on the portion of the bill the company pays, excluding any amount recovered from employees.

Who this affects

Manufacturing businesses that are legally required to provide canteen facilities to their employees.

An example

A textile factory is required by law to run a canteen. They pay the caterer 100 rupees plus 5 rupees GST, and recover 20 rupees from employees. Under this ruling, the factory can claim GST credit only on the 80 rupees they effectively paid, not the full 100 rupees.

What you should do

Review your canteen service contracts and the portion of costs you recover from employees. Remember that this ruling only binds the company that asked; your local tax officer may still have a different view, so consult your tax advisor before changing your filing strategy.

If you do nothing

If you claim full credit without excluding the employee-recovered portion, you risk a tax audit and potential penalties. Tax officers may view this as an incorrect claim of input tax credit, leading to interest charges and recovery proceedings.

The terms explained

Input Tax Credit
The tax a business pays on its purchases that it can use to reduce the tax it owes on its own sales.
Advance Ruling
A formal decision from tax authorities on how GST laws apply to a specific business situation.
Statutorily Mandatory
Services or actions that a business is legally required to provide under government regulations.

The ruling in detail

Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s Tata Motors Limited

GUJ/GAAAR/APPEAL/2022/23 dated 22.12.2022 · Gujarat

Questions before the authority

  • Whether input tax credit (ITC) available to applicant on GST charged by service provider on canteen facility provided to employees working in factory?
  • Whether GST is applicable on nominal amount recovered by Applicant from employees for usage of canteen facility?
  • If ITC is available as per question no. (1) above, whether it will be restricted to the extent of cost borne by the Applicant (employer)?

Facts

The appellant is a manufacturing unit that maintains canteen facilities for its employees to comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948. The appellant recovers a nominal amount from its employees for the usage of these canteen facilities, while the remaining expenditure is borne by the company. The appellant sought a ruling on the admissibility of Input Tax Credit on the GST charged by the canteen service provider.

Ruling

QuestionWhat the authority ruled
ITC on canteen facilityAvailable
Restricted to direct employees and subject to the cost borne by the employer
GST on nominal recoveryNot addressed in the final ruling
The final ruling focused on the ITC eligibility and restriction
Restriction of ITC to cost borneYes
Proportionate credit to the extent of cost recovered from employees is disallowed

The Appellate Authority held that the appellant is eligible to claim Input Tax Credit on the GST charged by the canteen service provider for facilities provided to its direct employees, as such provision is mandatory under the Factories Act. However, this credit is restricted to the extent of the cost borne by the appellant and is not available for the portion of the cost recovered from employees. The ruling modifies the original Advance Ruling to allow this credit.

Reasoning

The authority relied on the amendment to Section 17(5)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017, effective from 01.02.2019, which allows ITC for goods or services that are obligatory for an employer to provide under any law. Citing CBIC Circular No. 172/04/2022-GST, the authority clarified that the proviso to Section 17(5)(b) applies to the entire clause, thereby enabling ITC for mandatory canteen services. Furthermore, applying the principle from the Bombay High Court in Ultratech Cement Ltd., the authority determined that ITC must be restricted to the cost borne by the employer, as the portion recovered from employees represents a cost borne by the consumer.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 17(5)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948
  • CBIC Circular No. 172/04/2022-GST dated 06.07.2022
  • Gujarat Factory Rules, 1963

For the practitioner

This ruling provides **significant relief** to manufacturing entities by confirming that ITC is available on canteen services that are statutorily mandatory under the Factories Act. Practitioners should note that the credit is **strictly limited** to the portion of the cost borne by the employer and excludes services provided to contract workers or visitors. It settles the interpretation that the proviso to Section 17(5)(b) is not restricted to travel benefits but applies to the entire clause.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/2024-02/23_tata_motors_limited.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 13-10-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling apply to all businesses in India?

No. An advance ruling is only legally binding on the business that requested it and their specific tax office. It serves as a guide for how authorities might view similar cases, but it is not a universal law.

Can I claim credit for canteen services provided to contract workers?

This ruling specifically addresses direct employees. You should consult with a tax professional before applying this logic to contract workers or visitors, as the rules may differ.

What if my local tax officer disagrees with this ruling?

Since this ruling is not a law that applies to everyone, a tax officer can take a different position. You should document your reasoning and consult with an expert to assess your specific risk.