Talk to an expert

Tell us what you need and we will call you back the same day.

🇮🇳 +91

    Net Worth & Solvency Glossary · NBFC & RBI

    Capital to Risk-weighted Assets Ratio (CRAR) for NBFCs

    noun · abbreviated "CRAR"; also called the capital adequacy ratio; a percentage, not a rupee figure
    Definition

    The capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CRAR) measures a lender's regulatory capital against its assets after each asset has been weighted for its risk. It is expressed as a percentage.

    For a non-banking financial company (NBFC), it shows whether the capital held is adequate for the risk in the lending book, not just for the book's size.

    • Written by Subham Jhunjhunwala
    • Reviewed by CA Sundram Gupta
    • Reviewed on · Updated

    See related terms

    The shape of the ratio

    Tier I capitalthe core capital
    Tier II capitalthe supplementary capital
    divided by
    Risk-weighted assets
    • each asset multiplied by a weight for its risk
    • a low-risk asset counts for little; an unsecured loan counts in full
    • off-balance-sheet exposures converted and included

    = CRAR a percentage, read against the minimum the Reserve Bank of India sets for the NBFC's category

    How it is built

    01How CRAR weighs capital against risk-weighted exposure

    CRAR is a fraction. What goes on each line decides everything the ratio says.

    The top line

    Capital as the regulator defines it

    Counted in tiers: Tier I, the core capital, and Tier II, the supplementary capital.

    The bottom line

    Risk-weighted assets, not the balance sheet total

    Each asset is multiplied by a weight that reflects its risk, so a low-risk asset counts for little and an unsecured loan counts in full. Off-balance-sheet exposures are converted and included.

    Weighting is the whole idea

    Dividing one line by the other gives the ratio. Two NBFCs with the same capital and balance sheets of the same size can report very different ratios.

     
    Lends against strong security
    Lends unsecured
    Capital held
    Same
    Same
    Balance sheet size
    Same
    Same
    Risk-weighted assets
    Lower
    Higher
    CRAR
    Higher
    Lower

    Same capital, same size, different ratio: the weights did that, not the lending volume.

    It also moves
    Lending grows, so risk-weighted assets grow
    CRAR falls, unless capital grows too

    When people search for CRAR for NBFC or CRAR ratio, they mean this measure as the Reserve Bank of India applies it to NBFCs.

    Two tests, not one

    02Where CRAR reporting and net owned fund certification part ways

    CRAR and net owned fund (NOF) share some inputs, but they are separate tests, and confusing them causes real errors.

    Net owned fund NOF

    Measured as
    An absolute rupee figure.
    Starts from
    Owned funds, with the prescribed deductions applied.
    Measured against
    A minimum amount.
    Who and when
    A CA certifies it at a date.

    Capital to risk-weighted assets ratio CRAR

    Measured as
    A percentage.
    Starts from
    Capital in tiers, weighed against the whole risk-weighted book.
    Measured against
    A minimum ratio.
    Who and when
    Reported periodically.

    An NBFC can clear its NOF minimum comfortably while sitting close to its CRAR floor, or the reverse. A net owned fund certificate for an NBFC speaks to the NOF test. It should not be read as confirming capital adequacy. A worked guide shows how net owned fund is calculated, and Net Owned Fund vs Paid-Up Capital: Where They Differ separates it from share capital.

    A different measure, not a smaller version of the same one. A reader given one when they asked for the other has been given a different measure. An NOF certificate answers "is the owned base above the minimum amount?"; CRAR answers "is the capital enough for the risk in the book?"

    Detail and source

    03The minimum CRAR and Tier II ceiling RBI applies to NBFCs

    The Reserve Bank of India sets capital adequacy minimums in its capital adequacy directions for the NBFCs those directions cover, with separate requirements for the Tier I and Tier II layers.

    What the current direction sets

    Under the Reserve Bank of India (Non-Banking Financial Companies - Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy) Directions, 2025, an NBFC in the Middle Layer and above keeps a CRAR of at least 15 per cent and Tier I capital of at least 10 per cent of its risk-weighted assets. An NBFC lending mainly against gold jewellery keeps CRAR at 15 per cent and Tier I at 12 per cent. Tier II capital may never exceed Tier I capital, and an Upper Layer NBFC also keeps Common Equity Tier I capital of at least 9 per cent.

    Read it from the current direction. The figure that applies to a particular company is read from the current RBI direction for its category, not from memory or from an older circular.

    Written by Subham Jhunjhunwala · Reviewed by CA Sundram Gupta

    Reviewed on: Last updated: Applies to: non-banking financial companies regulated by the Reserve Bank of India

    Sources: the Reserve Bank of India's capital adequacy directions for NBFCs (Reserve Bank of India). This entry describes Indian practice in general terms. The current RBI direction governs each NBFC.

    Need help with a certificate that uses capital to risk-weighted assets ratio? See our Net Owned Fund Certificate for NBFCs.