Talk to an Expert
Talk to an Expert ✆ +91 945 945 6700
Advance rulings (AAR) Keralam

GST Advance Ruling KER/08/2025 on Input Tax Refunds and Exemptions

Ruling
ADVANCE RULING No.KER/08/2025 Dated 16.04.2025
Authority
Authority for Advance Ruling

This page was written by Patron Accounting’s AI from the official release and reviewed before publishing. It explains the document in plain language. It is not the document itself. Where this page and the original differ, the original governs.

In short

The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Kerala examined whether a research foundation could claim Goods and Services Tax (GST) refunds on construction costs and tax exemptions on future ticket sales. The foundation asked if they could recover input tax paid on building materials and works contracts, and if their nursery ticket sales would be tax-free.

What has changed

How it worked before

Many businesses often assume that non-profit or research-oriented entities might automatically qualify for tax relief or refunds on infrastructure spending. Before this ruling, there was uncertainty regarding whether such foundations could treat construction expenses as refundable input tax under Section 54(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act.

What has changed

The Authority ruled that the foundation is not eligible for these refunds or exemptions because they failed to prove they met the specific legal criteria. In practice, this means you cannot claim a refund for construction-related GST unless you can clearly demonstrate that your business model falls under specific categories like zero-rated supplies or an inverted duty structure.

Who this affects

This ruling is relevant to research foundations, non-profit organizations, and any business planning significant construction projects who are hoping to recover GST paid on building materials or contractor services.

What you should do

You should not assume this ruling applies to your specific business, as an advance ruling is only binding on the applicant and their local tax office. If you are considering a similar claim, consult with a tax professional to identify the exact legal notifications that apply to your situation rather than relying on general arguments for relief.

The ruling in detail

Authority for Advance Ruling

M/s. M.S.SWAMINATHAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION

ADVANCE RULING No.KER/08/2025 Dated 16.04.2025 · Keralam

Questions before the authority

  • Whether the Foundation is eligible to get refunds of input tax paid on its purchases of building materials under section 54(3) of the GST Act?
  • Whether the Foundation is eligible to get refund of tax paid to the works contractor under section 54(3) of the GST Act?
  • Whether the Foundation will be eligible for exemption on sale of tickets when the nursery becomes functional in a full-fledged manner?

Facts

The applicant is a research foundation initiating a project for the conservation of endangered plant species and the development of plant nurseries. They intend to construct buildings and hire contractors for this purpose. The applicant sought an advance ruling on the eligibility for input tax refunds on construction-related expenses and potential GST exemptions for future ticket sales.

Held

The Authority ruled against the applicant on all three questions. It held that there are no grounds to grant refunds of input tax paid on building materials or works contracts under section 54(3). Furthermore, it denied the request for an exemption on the sale of tickets for the nursery.

Reasoning

The Authority noted that refunds under section 54(3) of the CGST Act are strictly limited to cases of zero-rated supplies or inverted duty structures, neither of which was substantiated by the applicant. Regarding the exemption request, the applicant failed to cite any specific notification or serial number under which the exemption could be claimed. The Authority emphasized that it cannot entertain general pleas for exemption that do not reference specific legal provisions. Consequently, the application was rejected for lack of evidence and failure to meet the statutory requirements for the relief sought.

Provisions relied on

  • Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 97(2) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017

For the practitioner

This ruling serves as a reminder that applicants must provide specific evidence and legal grounding when seeking refunds or exemptions. It confirms that the Authority will not grant relief based on **general assertions** of being on par with the government. Practitioners should note that the ruling does not establish a precedent for the substantive merits of such claims, but rather highlights the **procedural failure** to substantiate the application.

Source

This is a summary prepared from the published order, which is a scanned document. It is a reading aid and not the authority: where the two differ, the order governs. Verify every provision against the original before relying on it.

Original order: https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/AAR/6-ar_order_m.s.swaminathan_research_foundation.pdf

Legibility of the scan, as read: high.

Prepared 05-09-2026.

About Patron Accounting LLP

Patron Accounting LLP is a CA and CS-led accounting and compliance firm that has been working with businesses across India since 2019. We handle the work that keeps a company correct with every department it answers to: day-to-day bookkeeping and accounting, GST registration and returns, income tax filing and assessments, TDS, payroll and PF/ESI, company and LLP incorporation, ROC and MCA compliance, statutory and internal audit, physical stock and inventory audits, trademark and other registrations, and the certificates and reports that banks, buyers and regulators ask for.

Our clients range from a first proprietorship registering for GST to established companies running operations across several states. Much of our work is exactly this: reading what a department has published and telling a business, in plain terms, whether it changes anything for them.

We operate from five offices and serve clients across the rest of India remotely:

  • Pune (HQ): RTC Silver, B4-708, Sai Satyam Park, Wagholi, Pune, Maharashtra 412207
  • Mumbai: 104, Rajshila Building, 597 J.S.S. Road, Marine Lines, Mumbai 400002
  • Delhi: 3rd Floor, B-6/154-155, Sector 5, Rohini, Delhi 110085
  • Gurugram: Pioneer Urban Square, B109, Golf Course Ext Road, Sector 62, Gurugram 122098
  • Ahmedabad: Phoenix Tower, 1107, near Commerce Six Road, Drive In Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380009

If anything on this page affects you and you would like somebody to look at your own position, we are glad to help. Call +91 94594 56700, write to sales@patronaccounting.com, or visit patronaccounting.com. The first conversation costs nothing.

Does this ruling mean I can never get a refund on construction GST?

No, this ruling does not create a blanket ban on all refunds. It simply highlights that you must strictly follow the conditions set out in Section 54(3) of the CGST Act, which are generally limited to specific scenarios like inverted duty structures.

Is this Kerala AAR decision binding on my business in another state?

No, an advance ruling is only legally binding on the specific applicant and the tax authorities in that state. While it provides insight into how officials interpret the law, it does not set a national precedent that you can automatically apply to your own tax filings.

What happens if my local tax officer disagrees with my interpretation of GST exemptions?

If your local officer disagrees, you must be prepared to provide specific legal notifications or statutory provisions that support your claim. General assertions about the nature of your work are not enough to secure an exemption if they are not backed by clear documentation.

Why was the request for a ticket sales exemption denied?

The request was denied because the applicant failed to cite any specific notification or legal serial number that grants an exemption for their particular activity. The Authority clarified that they cannot grant exemptions based on general requests without a clear legal basis.