Overview
📌 TL;DR - Service Exports Services at a Glance
GST refund on service exports is allowed under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act 2017 read with Rule 89 of the CGST Rules 2017 when 5 conditions are met simultaneously - supplier in India, recipient outside India, place of supply outside India, payment in convertible foreign exchange (or INR where RBI permits), and supplier and recipient not merely establishments of a distinct person under Explanation 1 to Section 8.
| Quick Reference | Details |
|---|---|
| Governing Provision | Section 2(6) and Section 16 of IGST Act 2017 read with Rule 89 of CGST Rules 2017 |
| Applicable To | IT services, SaaS, software development, consulting, BPO, KPO, Global In-house Centres (GICs), professional services exporters |
| Filing Form | Form GST RFD-01 under LUT route (Statement 3) or IGST-paid route (Statement 2) |
| Key Documentary Proof | FIRC, FIRA, or eBRC; CA Certificate per Gujarat HC Dec 2025 and Karnataka HC Mavenir 2025 |
| Time Limit | 2 years from receipt of foreign exchange or invoice date, whichever later (Section 54(1) Explanation 2(c)) |
| Refund Formula (LUT) | Rule 89(4) - (Turnover of Zero-Rated Supply x Net ITC) / Adjusted Total Turnover |
| Provisional Refund | 90 percent under CGST Instruction 6/2025 dated 03 October 2025 for low-risk filings |
Service exports are India's third-largest forex earner after IT-BPM and remittances, with the IT services sector alone exporting over USD 200 billion annually. Yet service-export GST refund is structurally harder than goods-export refund because there is no shipping bill - so the Rule 96 auto-refund path (which uses the shipping bill as deemed application) does not exist for services. Service exporters must always file Form GST RFD-01 manually, irrespective of whether they took the IGST-paid route or the LUT route under Rule 89.
The substantive qualification gate is Section 2(6) of the IGST Act 2017 - all 5 conditions must be satisfied simultaneously. The most litigated of these is condition (v) - the supplier and recipient must not be merely establishments of a distinct person under Explanation 1 to Section 8. CBIC Circular 161/17/2021-GST dated 20 September 2021 clarified that an Indian subsidiary supplying to its foreign parent qualifies (separate legal persons), but an Indian branch supplying to a foreign head office does not (same legal entity, distinct establishments). Patron Accounting LLP files, defends, and recovers service-export GST refunds for 200+ Indian IT, SaaS, software development, consulting, BPO, KPO, and Global In-house Centre exporters with 15+ years of cross-border tax and GST compliance experience.
Content is reviewed quarterly for accuracy.