Ind AS 10 Events after the Reporting Period: A Practitioner Guide for FY 2026-27
Ind AS 10 (Events after the Reporting Period) is the Indian Accounting Standard that governs how companies treat events occurring between the end of the reporting period and the date of authorisation of financial statements.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs notified Ind AS 10 via the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015. It became mandatory from 1 April 2016 for Phase I companies. Ind AS 10 replaced AS 4 for all Ind AS-applicable entities and is converged with IAS 10 issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
For FY 2026-27, listed companies must coordinate Ind AS 10 disclosures with Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) material event requirements. Stock exchange filings on significant post-year-end events directly impact what must be disclosed under Ind AS 10.
Ind AS 10 at a Glance
Ind AS 10 establishes how entities report and disclose events that occur after the reporting period but before financial statements are authorised for issue. Its core principle is to distinguish between adjusting and non-adjusting events. The standard primarily serves preparers and auditors of financial statements in companies following Indian Accounting Standards.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Standard Number | Ind AS 10 |
| Full Name | Events after the Reporting Period |
| Issuing Body | ICAI (Accounting Standards Board) |
| Notified By | MCA, Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, dated 16 February 2015 |
| Effective Date | 1 April 2015 (voluntary), 1 April 2016 (mandatory Phase I) |
| Supersedes | AS 4 (Contingencies and Events Occurring After the Balance Sheet Date) for Ind AS-applicable entities |
| Equivalent Standard | AS 4 ↔ Ind AS 10 ↔ IAS 10 |
| Applies To | All companies required to follow Indian Accounting Standards. Ind AS 10 prescribes when an entity should adjust its financial statements for events after the reporting period and the disclosures it should give about the date when the financial statements are authorised for issue. |
What is Ind AS 10: Events after the Reporting Period?
Ind AS 10 sets out how an entity should account for significant events that happen between its balance sheet date and when its financial statements are formally authorised. These events can either require adjustment to amounts reported or only disclosure in notes if they are material but do not affect conditions at year-end.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India introduced this standard as part of India's convergence with International Financial Reporting Standards. It replaced earlier guidance in Accounting Standard (AS) 4 and aligns closely with IAS 10 issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
This standard is most relevant to finance teams preparing annual accounts under Ind AS, statutory auditors forming audit opinions under SA 700, and company secretaries ensuring compliance with disclosure requirements.
Objective of Ind AS 10
The objectives of Ind AS 10 are:
- Prescribe when an entity should adjust its financial statements for events after the reporting period (adjusting events).
- Specify the disclosures an entity should give about the date when financial statements are authorised for issue and about events after the reporting period (non-adjusting events).
- Require disclosure of dividends declared after the reporting period as non-adjusting events in the notes.
These objectives ensure users receive a true and fair view as required by Section 129 of the Companies Act, 2013. Timely recognition or disclosure of significant post-year-end developments upholds transparency and comparability in corporate reporting.
Who Must Apply Ind AS 10?
Entities covered, applicability table
Ind AS 10 applies to all companies mandated to prepare financial statements under Indian Accounting Standards as notified by Ministry of Corporate Affairs. This includes:
| Roadmap Phase | Entities Covered |
|---|---|
| Phase I | Listed companies or those having net worth ≥ Rs 500 crore (from FY 2016-17) |
| Phase II | Unlisted companies with net worth ≥ Rs 250 crore but < Rs 500 crore (from FY 2017-18) |
| NBFCs/Other Entities | As per phased roadmap notified by MCA |
All subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures or holding companies of these entities must also comply.
Scope exclusions
Ind AS 10 does not apply to:
- Events relating solely to going concern status where specific guidance requires disclosure rather than adjustment.
When the standard does not apply
If post-balance-sheet events relate exclusively to going concern uncertainty arising after year-end but before authorisation, specific guidance applies, typically requiring disclosure only unless going concern is no longer appropriate. Other areas such as contingencies fall under Ind AS 37.
Key Definitions under Ind AS 10
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Events after the reporting period | Favourable or unfavourable events occurring between year-end and authorisation date. |
| Adjusting events | Evidence about conditions existing at year-end; require adjustment in accounts. |
| Non-adjusting events | Conditions arising only after year-end; disclosed if material but not adjusted. |
| Date of authorisation for issue | Date board approves accounts for issue. |
| Going concern | Entity expected to continue operations; special rules if post-year-end events threaten this assumption. |
Recognition and Measurement under Ind AS 10
When to recognise
Under Para 8 of Ind AS 10, an entity must adjust its financial statements for adjusting events, those providing evidence about conditions that existed at year-end but became known only before accounts were authorised for issue. Non-adjusting events, arising from new conditions post year-end, are not recognised in figures but require note disclosure if material (Para 21).
Dividends declared by directors after year-end do not create a liability at balance sheet date; these are disclosed in notes per Para 12 rather than recognised as liabilities.
The going concern assessment is critical, if post-year-end developments make it inappropriate to prepare accounts on a going concern basis, figures must be adjusted accordingly (Para 14).
Initial measurement
When an adjusting event occurs, assets or liabilities reported at year-end must be revised based on new evidence received before authorisation date. For example:
Revised Carrying Amount = Original Carrying Amount ± Adjustment from Post-Year-End Evidence
Examples include settlement amounts decided by courts post-year-end relating to disputes existing at year-end; discovery that inventory was impaired as at balance sheet date; or confirmation that a customer was insolvent at year-end even if bankruptcy was filed later.
Subsequent measurement
For non-adjusting events, such as business combinations signed after year-end or natural disasters occurring subsequently, the entity does not alter balances as at reporting date. However, if these are material, Para 21 requires disclosure describing their nature and estimated financial effect or stating that such estimate cannot be made reliably.
Entities must also disclose any deterioration in operating results or position arising from such non-adjusting events where relevant for understanding users’ decisions.
Adjusting vs Non-Adjusting, The Crucial Distinction
The distinction turns on whether evidence relates to conditions already present at balance sheet date or new circumstances arising later. For instance:
A customer’s bankruptcy filed soon after year-end is typically an adjusting event if their deteriorating condition existed at year-end, even if formal insolvency proceedings began later.
A fire destroying inventory post-year-end is usually a non-adjusting event since it reflects a new condition entirely unrelated to prior circumstances.
Dividends proposed or declared by directors after balance sheet date are always non-adjusting under Para 12, a departure from legacy treatment under earlier standards like AS 4 which permitted liability recognition for proposed dividends.
If post-balance-sheet developments cast doubt on going concern status such that it becomes inappropriate, figures must be adjusted even if this fact emerges only before accounts are authorised (Para 14). In our audit practice we frequently observe management judgement being tested most acutely around these borderline cases, especially during economic downturns or sectoral stress periods.
Worked Examples on Ind AS 10
Example 1: Adjusting event, court settlement post-year-end
Sundaram Engineering Pvt Ltd was sued by a supplier for Rs 3 crore alleging breach of contract; case pending at March 31, 2026. On May 15, 2026, ahead of authorisation, the court orders settlement at Rs 1.80 crore.
Computation Table
| Item | Amount | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Original provision/contingent liability | Rs 3 crore | Case pending; provision/contingent liability considered |
| Court settlement amount decided | Rs 1.80 crore | Provides evidence about condition existing at year end |
| Revised provision recognised | Rs 1.80 crore | Adjusted in FY 2025-26 accounts |
Journal Entry
Dr Litigation Expense (P&L) Rs 1.80 crore
Cr Provision for Litigation Rs 1.80 crore
Disclose judgement applied in significant accounting policies section.
Example 2: Non-adjusting event, proposed dividend
Krishna Steel Industries’ board declares a final dividend of Rs 5 crore on May 18, 2026 relating to FY 2025-26 profits; accounts are authorised June 30, 2026.
Computation Table
| Item | Amount | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend declared by board | Rs 5 crore | Declared post-year end |
| Liability recognised in FY 2025-26 | Nil | No liability recognised per Para 12 |
| Disclosure required | Rs 5 crore | Disclose board recommendation & amount in notes; recognise liability only upon AGM approval |
Journal Entry
No entry required in FY 2025-26
Disclosure note example:
“The Board has recommended a final dividend of Rs 5 crore for FY 2025-26 subject to shareholder approval at AGM.”
Disclosure Requirements under Ind AS 10
Disclosures under Ind AS 10 are critical for compliance with Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013. They ensure transparency about significant post-year-end events and the timing of financial statement authorisation. Proper disclosure enables users, including auditors and investors, to assess the impact of subsequent events on the entity’s financial position.
| Item | Requirement | Para Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Date of authorisation for issue | Disclose the date when financial statements were authorised for issue and who gave that authorisation | Para 17 |
| Power to amend after issue | If owners or others can amend the financial statements after issue, disclose that fact | Para 17 |
| Adjusting events | Updated information about conditions at reporting date receives adjustment, with disclosure if material | Para 19 |
| Non-adjusting events of material nature | Nature of the event and an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such estimate cannot be made | Para 21 |
| Dividends declared after reporting period | Amount per share and total amount | Para 13 |
| Going concern indicators arising after reporting period | Disclose deterioration of operating results and financial position; adjust if going concern is no longer appropriate | Para 14-16 |
Auditors must verify these disclosures as part of their reporting responsibilities under SA 700.
Common Mistakes & Industry-Specific Considerations
Common errors auditors flag
- Recognising dividends declared after the reporting period as a liability at year-end (this was AS 4 treatment; Ind AS 10 prohibits).
- Treating a customer bankruptcy filed after year-end as a non-adjusting event (typically adjusting if conditions existed at year-end).
- Failing to disclose date of authorisation for issue (mandatory under Para 17).
- Adjusting financial statements for events that clearly relate to new conditions (e.g., natural disasters after year-end).
- Inadequate disclosure of financial effect of material non-adjusting events.
- Missing the going concern assessment when events after reporting period materially deteriorate the entity's position.
Industry application notes
Listed companies must coordinate Ind AS 10 disclosures with Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR). Material post-year-end events disclosed to stock exchanges often require parallel disclosure in annual accounts.
In real estate, contracts signed after year-end are usually non-adjusting unless they provide evidence about pricing or impairment at year-end. Sales post-year-end may inform net realisable value (NRV) assessment for unsold inventory.
Banks and NBFCs treat loan defaults occurring after year-end as adjusting if they provide evidence about customer condition at balance sheet date. The expected credit loss (ECL) model under Ind AS 109 incorporates such subsequent evidence in measuring credit risk.
Ind AS 10 vs AS 4 vs IFRS: Key Differences
The table below summarises major differences between Ind AS 10, AS 4, and IAS/IFRS requirements:
| Aspect | AS 4 | Ind AS 10 | IFRS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed dividend recognition | Recognised as liability at reporting date | Not recognised; disclosed only | Not recognised; disclosed only |
| Adjusting vs non-adjusting framework | Same framework | Same framework | Same framework |
| Date of authorisation disclosure | Implicit | Mandatory (Para 17) | Mandatory |
| Going concern | Disclosure-focused | Adjustment if no longer appropriate (Para 14) | Same as Ind AS |
| Scope | Includes contingencies | Contingencies covered separately by Ind AS 37 | Same as Ind AS |
India’s approach under Ind AS aligns closely with IFRS except on proposed dividend recognition. Under legacy AS 4, companies recognised proposed dividends as liabilities at year-end; this is now prohibited under both Ind AS 10 and IFRS. Contingencies are covered by Ind AS 37 rather than within Ind AS 10.
Latest Amendments to Ind AS 10 (FY 2026-27)
No amendments have been notified to Ind AS 10 for FY 2026-27 as of 2026-05-02. The standard continues to apply in its existing form.
Related Standards You Should Know
- [Ind AS 1](/ind-as-1-presentation-of-financial-statements/), Going concern assumption disclosed under Ind AS 1; Ind AS 10 events affect that assessment.
- [Ind AS 37](/ind-as-37-provisions-contingencies/), Contingent liabilities and provisions affected by post-reporting evidence.
- [Ind AS 36](/ind-as-36-impairment-of-assets/), Impairment indicators identified after reporting date may be adjusting events.
- [AS 4](/as-4-contingencies-events-after-bs/), Equivalent standard for non-Ind AS companies; differs on proposed dividend treatment.
Need Help with Ind AS 10 Compliance?
Patron Accounting LLP supports CFOs, finance teams, and statutory auditors in achieving full compliance with Ind AS 10 Events after the Reporting Period. Our team applies deep technical expertise to ensure your disclosures align with Schedule III, SEBI LODR, and audit requirements.
Our services include:
- Statutory Audit
- Ind AS Advisory
- Financial Reporting & Schedule III
- Disclosure Review
Schedule a 30-minute consultation with our Ind AS team, Pune · Mumbai · Delhi · Gurugram.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
All companies required to prepare financial statements under Indian Accounting Standards must comply with Ind AS 10. This includes listed entities, large unlisted companies meeting net worth criteria, and their subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures, or holding companies in India.
Adjusting events provide evidence about conditions existing at the reporting date; entities must adjust their accounts accordingly. Non-adjusting events relate to new conditions arising only after year-end; these are not adjusted but require disclosure in notes if material.
Under Ind AS 10 (Para 12), dividends declared by directors after the reporting period are not recognised as liabilities at balance sheet date. Instead, they must be disclosed in notes until approved by shareholders at the annual general meeting.
The “date of authorisation for issue” is when an entity’s board or relevant authority formally approves the financial statements for release. This date must be disclosed in accordance with Para 17 of Ind AS 10.
The main difference is on proposed dividend treatment, AS 4 allowed recognition as liability at year-end; Ind AS 10 prohibits this. Also, disclosure requirements around authorisation dates are stricter under Ind AS 10 compared to implicit guidance in AS 4.
If post-year-end developments make it inappropriate to prepare accounts on a going concern basis before authorisation date, figures must be adjusted accordingly. The entity must also disclose reasons per Para 14-16 of Ind AS 10 and related requirements in Ind AS 1.
Court settlements finalised after balance sheet date are adjusting events only if they provide evidence about conditions existing at year-end, such as pending litigation where outcome clarifies pre-existing obligations per Para 8-9 of Ind AS 10.
For material non-adjusting events occurring between balance sheet date and authorisation date, entities must disclose their nature and an estimate of their financial effect, or state if estimation is impracticable, as required by Para 21 of Ind AS 10.
Yes. Listed companies making SEBI LODR filings about significant post-year-end transactions should ensure corresponding disclosures appear in annual accounts per Ind AS 10. Coordination avoids inconsistencies between regulatory filings and statutory disclosures.
If fraud discovered post-year-end provides evidence that it existed before balance sheet date, it is an adjusting event requiring correction in accounts. If it relates solely to periods after year-end, only note disclosure may be necessary depending on materiality.
About This Article
Reviewed by CA & CS Team · Patron Accounting LLP
Technical reviewer: CA Sundram Gupta, FCA
Last reviewed: 2026-05-02
Sources: ICAI Compendium of Accounting Standards · MCA Notification (Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015, dated 16 February 2015) · IFRS Foundation